ANTH 111 EXAM 2 Study Guide

8 Pages
508 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Anthropology
Course
ANTH 111
Professor
Sebastien Lacombe
Semester
Fall

Description
EXAM 2 Intro to Anthropology Archaeology Professor Lacombe Introduction History  First Excavations o Pompeii (1743) o Troy (1872-1873) o Valley of the Kings (1922) Discipline  Excavating the Past o Chronology o Stratigraphy  Depth o Matrix Concept Understanding the Past  Must put aside personal opinions o Look at the facts  Artifacts only make sense in their context  Try to replicate what is found Reconstructing the Past  This is the ultimate responsibility of archaeologists  Archaeology is not about buildings or artifacts o It is about PEOPLE, in SOCIETIES Material Culture  A recurring assemblage of artifacts from a specific time and place Transformation of Material Culture  Transformation to something more “organized,” more standardized o Diversity o Complexity  Examples: o Stone tools evolving  Being able to do finer and finer work o Sewing needles  Bone  Steel  Going beyond the strictly functional aspect o SYMBOLIC  It is harder and harder to distinguish between functional and symbolic  What’s important is the people behind it Why is Context Important?  Need to understand the purpose of things o Understand how each artifact was used in everyday life  There are MANY artifacts, and each was made for a specific purpose  It’s not HOW, but WHY people did something  Example: o Scythian Culture  Very poorly understood  Known exclusively for its burials  Beautifully created jewelry  Setting can be also be important o Example:  Soldiers buried with their horses *Things are preserved when they are frozen in the ground* Conclusion  Material Culture by itself will not tell you anything o You need the people behind it  For this reason, archaeology isn’t that easy Subsistence  Why is it interesting? o It is well-documented in archaeological record Multiple Techniques of Recovery  Faunal Analysis o Studying what they ate o Use bones at the site  These are identified in the lab  Can see food evidence on teeth sometimes o Looks at traces on the bones  How people cut up the animals  Archaeology of Tools o Looking at (mostly stone) tools o Looking at traces  Shape, Marks  Can infer different uses o Looking at residue  On tools and in pottery  Examples: o Spears engraved with animals o Grinding stones o Sickle blades o Fish hooks  Paleoethnobotany o Study of plant remains  Analysis of Coprolites & Stomach Contents o Content of stomach = last meal  Not necessary accurate of everyday meals o Looks at isotopes of carbon  Indicative of certain types of plants  Other Sources? o Cave Art Subsistence Strategies Reflect Social Practices  There is very often a ritual component o Burials, cave paintings  Subsistence = food + everything else about it o The ritual component  All choices were made by the people War and Conflicts Origin of Interpersonal Violence  There is some ambiguity amongst anthropologists o Continuation of biological instinct?  biological o Outcome of competition  cultural o CONFLICT  archaeological Recognizing Violence  (INDIVIDUAL) skeletal evidence is ambiguous o MULTIPLE bodies help  Injury  Force beyond necessary  Location & nature of wounds  Maybe absence of grave goods o COMPLETE CONTEXT IS NECESSARY! Evidence of Interpersonal Violence  No true evidence before the Mesolithic o Accidents? o Isolated examples of violence are not compelling  Increasing & compelling evidence during & after the Neolithic  Enormous regional variation  Examples: o Jebel Sahaba, Sudan  13,000 years ago  24 projectiles embedded in bodies (out of 59 total bodies)  Most compelling evidence of systematic violence Mesolithic Evidence  Ofnet Cave, Germany o 8,500 BP o Mostly women and children  Denmark sites  Very shady because it is spread out  *Beginning to become convincing* Neolithic Evidence  It is difficult to NOT see the evidence  Examples: o Passy-Veron, Bucheres, France  Piles of bones  Arrowheads embedded (in backs especially)  ALL show signs of violent death o Talheim, Germany  34 skeletons  3 groups  Locals – men & children only  Cattle herders  1 Family  Domestic tools used o Herxheim, Germany  2 Trenches  Filled with human & animal (mostly dog) remains  Estimated 1,000 individuals o Bones have been crushed and cut  NOT the dogs, though  Evidence of defleshing & gnawing o Tongliao, China  Entire population killed  ALL show signs of violence  Can also look at settlements o Examples:  Fortifications, gates  These settlements show signs that something has changed Bronze Age & Iron Age  Example: o Biskupin, Poland  Peat did not deplete as quickly  Resulted in preservation o Roads, buildings, and plows o Over 100 houses  Evidence of weapons, not domestic tools o Professional tools Cultural Aspect  This began with the emergence of “states”
More Less

Related notes for ANTH 111

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit