COMPLETE The Policymaking Process Article Notes - Part 4 (4.0ed this course!)

3 Pages
Unlock Document

Boston University
Political Science
CAS PO 331

"Party Polarization In American Politics: Characteristics, Causes, and Consequences" Tuesday, February 18, 2014 10:41 PM I. Historical, Theoretical, and Recent Perspectives on Party Polarization ○ "Conflictdisplacement" : New crosscuttingissue emerges and parties become polarized on it, makingthe previous issue converge  Parties are polarized on one majority policy agenda at a time ○ First set of issues associated with partisan change were civil rights and racial equality ○ Second set of issues were cultural and moral concerns that includes abortion,homosexual rights and school prayer ○ The two parties are growing increasingly more "polarized" ○ "Conflictextension" - Current parties have grown increasingly divided on all the major policy II. Conflict Extension, Not Conflict Displacement ○ Welfare issues have emerged as the new center of the polarization  Should the gov't take an active role in fosteringsocial and economic equality? ○ Party polarization has grown on domestic concerns, defense and foreign policy ○ New partisan conflicts have not displaced old ones; party conflict has extended from older to newer issues III. The Parties in Government ○ Measure of growth of partisanshipand polarization in Congress  Percentage of party votes  Party unity scores  Interest group rating of members' voting records  NOMINATE scores of member ideology ○ Growing party polarizationon congressionalcommittees and member's support for presidential initiatives ○ Party conflict in Congress is shaped around liberal-conservative cleavage IV. Causes of Party Polarization in Congress 1. Social changes gives different socio-economicdemographicprofiles for the parties' constituents  Rates of Hispanicimmigration  Increasing income inequality  Growing residential segregation along racial/class lines  Increasing residential mobility and self-selection 2. Party strategies within Congress and power of party leaders  Members have policy goals, but reelection is proximateconcern  Electoral environment decides how willing members are to give up authority □ When party interests are broad, they are less willing to follow a leader so they can better represent their constituents □ Authority gives power to leaders to coerce moderates to vote with the party  Individual members are moving more towards extreme ideologies due to pressure V. The Parties in The Electorate ○ Polarization between the parties has grown but the extent of it is severely exaggerated  Data shows different location of the graph on the conservatism scale, but similar pattern VI. Theoretical Perspectives on Mass Party Polarization ○ Nature of the mass response 1. "Conflictdisplacement" View □ When party leaders take distinct stands on a new set of issues, individuals change their party ties in response to the new issues, RATHER THAN, changing their issue attitudes based on their party ties  Issues at the center of partisanship are the ones which people are least likely to change their minds on 2. "Ideological realignment" View □ Makes 3 assumptionsor basic findings Makes 3 assumptionsor basic findings □ 1) Parties in the electorate have grown more polarized along ideological lines 2) Parties have become structured along the same single liberal-conservative dimension that defines "elite-level party conflict" ◊ Uses one-dimensional indicators of mass ideology 3) There has been an "ideological realignment": Individuals are increasingly choosing a party affiliation based on heir ideological orientations ◊ Does not rule out "partisan persuasion": Individuals changing their ideologies and policy attitudes to make them consistent with their party ties 3. "Conflictextension" View (More accurate view of the 3) □ Attitudes towards welfare, social, racial and cultural issues are distinct but crosscutting  Due to crosscutting, as individuals increasingly choose party identifications based on the new issues, the level of party polarization of the old issues should decline ◊ Example: Conservative on welfare but liberal on cultural  Welfare and abortion can be conflicting ○ Electorate's response to "elite-level party polarization" has been limited 1. Party identifiers
More Less

Related notes for CAS PO 331

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.