Quiz 3.docx

4 Pages
Unlock Document

International Affairs

Middle East Quiz 3 Q1. What were the causes of the Iran-Iraq War? How did these factors contribute to the Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait? Please explain. (25 points) The Iran-Iraq War, which lasted from 1980 through 1988, was prompted by ideological fears and some strategically based interests. An analysis of the war’s causes can begin with land-based interests. Iraq, because of its shared borders with Kuwait and Iran, has a very limited access to waterways. Hussein believed that an attack on what he believed to be a newly weakened Iran could lead to significant land gains which might expand Iraq’s access to the Gulf. Hussein was particularly interested in the Shatt al-Arab waterway. Iran’s recent revolution also inspired some fears that the ideals of the revolution could expand to neighboring nations – including Iraq. Hussein attacked partly in an effort to suppress the ideas of the revolution and keep himself in power. An easy victory would have also been a way of consolidating Hussein’s power and legitimizing his government. Furthermore, the United States backed Iraq’s efforts for fear that the overthrow of American allies in the Middle East could lead to the spread of communism. This would have had significant impacts on American oil interests so the United States attempted to compensate by supporting Hussein with weapons and resources. Much of Iraq’s efforts during the war were funded by neighboring Kuwait. By the end of the war, Iraq had borrowed almost $80 billion to finance the war effort. Relations between Iraq and Kuwait turned sour because of Iraq’s inability to repay its debts. Saddam Hussein then proceeded to accuse Kuwait of slant drilling into Iraq’s petroleum and stealing oil reserves. This was the excuse he used to launch the invasion in 1990. Hussein also sought to garner political support after the embarrassing defeat in the Iraq-Iran war. He believed that a war with Kuwait would be quick, decisive, and successful. Q2. What is the impact of rentierism on democratization and industrialization in the Middle East? What kind of difference does the nature of resources (e.g. oil versus poppy) make on democratization in particular? Please explain. (25 points) Rentierism, in which developed nations paid “rents” to Middle Eastern countries for rights to natural resources such as oil, has significant impacts on democratization and industrialization in Middle Eastern states. Rentierism brings revenues to the state renting out its natural resources, however, these revenues do not come with industrial development. Rentierism historically slows economic growth and hampers efforts to promote industry. This economic model also creates sharp social disparities in which those who own the resources make all the profits but the general population is left in poverty. In the area of democratization, the resource being “rented” is critical. In oil-states, the disparities created by the model being implemented can create civil unrest. However, the power of the social and political elite is backed by enormous wealth – enough wealth, in fact, to pay for the suppression of any civil unrest. Iran is a perfect example. For a time, the country’s elites controlled the oil wealth and were able to keep themselves in power. Democratization in the country suffered. Non-oil rentierism-practicing states have experienced different effects on democratization in their respective countries. Morocco, for example, benefits from certain resources which are not completely legal. The drug trade has long been a staple of the Moroccan economy. This has created a combination of conflict and cooperation between the government and those running the drug trade. The drug trade in Morocco has created jobs for youth and created massive fortunes. With this in mind, the government has only really stepped in when there is a possible risk of a power shift. Other countries have begun to practice a more modern form of rentierism. Many non-oil states have to rely on such resources as tourism to bolster their economies. This type of rentierism has promoted economic growth and political change. An analysis of the Middle East currently reveals the differences in rentierism and their effects on democratization. The most powerful oil-states in the Middle East (Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq) did
More Less

Related notes for INTA 2XXX

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.