10/25
categorize our thoughts
desired/functional
• im on track
• i can do this
• i worked really hard
• i cant wiat
• yeah i look good
• it will be okay
or
undesirable/problematic->problematic overt behavior
• im going to embarass myself
• im fat
im going to fail
•
• i suck
• im not prepared
• im an idiot
• i cant believe i did that
• what was i thinking
• im not good/smart/pretty enough
paranoid thoughts
•
• ^thoughts can be antecedents, encourage you to do something relevant
• cognitive restructuring
• discriminant stimulus is an antecedent? (SD)
• can also function as a MO bc can be a reinforcer/change the value of reinforcers
• covert behavior very powerful, sign if impact on over behavior
what is cognitive behavior
thinking, covert behavior
how do you identify your cognitions
(write them down, self talk, become aware, look at your actions, looking at what oyu do & thoughts associated with it,
interviews of you by therapist, rating scales and questionnaires people can fill out, similar process to identify as
behavior assessment
keep a log-self monitor or self record, therapist interviews, o)ert anchors,
-interview
-self recording
-direct self report inventory,
-think aloud procedures
step 2: look at connection btwn covert and overt behavior
treatment approaches
• direct-change covert behavior • indirect-change overt behavior
• combo
•
• cognitive restructuring
• thought stopping
• rational emotive behavior therapy
• cognitive therapy
• acceptance based therapy
• benefits: clients learn self control skills that can be applied in other and future
situations
treating cognitive behavior-cognitive restructuring
• utilize throughout stopping
• interrupt disturbing thout “stop!”
• focus on competing adaptive thought
• reinterpret and re-imagine situation
• to treat excessive maladaptive thoughts
Rational emotive behavior therapy
• albert ellis
• emotioanly & maladaptive behavioral problems due to way people interpret them
• uses cognitive restructuring to change irrational thoughts associated with such
problems as anxiety, depression, anger, guilt
• “i think therefore i feel”
Self Management Procedures
• self monitoring
• self reinforcement
self graphing
•
• makes you independent, makes you AWARE-> REACTIVITY
• becomes reinforcing
issues enlisting others’ involvement
• they could be positive and motivating or negative towards goals
• could impact relationship with that person
• more hours, less consistent,
why does it work
• act of self monitoring functions as a cue/SD.reminder to engage in desired behavior-
reactivity-
• acts as reinforcer
• tangible
• person is invested, has control, part of it
Habit
• repetitive manipulative behavior that diminishes nervous tension and may be
automatically reinforcing • occurs most often when the person experiences heightened tension or stress- nail
biting hair pulling,
• problematic when occuring at a high frequency, SIB causing self harm distracting,
interfering with normal functioning, soically stigmatizing
• usually escaping stress or tension
habit reversal components
• awareness training- cant work to change something unless youre aware of all aspects
of it- aware youre engaging in it, & (when, why, who, consequenses) the URGE- if
youre aware you want to do it & about to do it,
pause in the urge
•
• competing response training
• Differental Reinforcement of Incompatible Behavior
• competing response is incompatible with the habit- do something different with
the part of your body that you have the habit as a problem with
• social support
• need people to help you (verbally) with especially with social activities, makes you
more accountable
• motivation procedure
• help someone find something motivating to get them going
group questions
• explain motor/vocal tics and give ex’s (including tourettes)
• repetitive jerking movements of a particular muscle group
• vocal tic- repetitive vocal sounds that are not purposeful
• facial twitching, shoulder raising
• tourettes- motor & vocal tic, neurological/ genetic
• describe treatment options
• awareness training (urge & actual emission of behavior)
• competing response- tensing muscles
• social support- reminders, reinforcement
Ch 23
• CONTRACTS
• document that specifies a contingent relationship btwn the completion of a specified
behavior and access to or delivery of a specified reward or activity
• a written doc btwn 2 parties in which 1 or more parties agree to change their behavior
• components: measurement system, timeframe, task record (chart to collect data on
contract),
• why task record included directly on contract?
• place to record progress: 1) serves as reminder to view contract regularly; 2) can
be used as checklist of tasks completed/data collection
• clearly defined target behaviors
• task: includes who, what, when, how well (may be used as a checklist for specific
tasks to be completed)
• objective measurement of the behavior
• product (ie task completion)- completed hw, 9 pages of dissertation per week • direct observation
• timeframe for engaging in behavior
• clear statement of reinforcement or punishment contingency
• who will implement the behavior
• behavioral/contingency contract
• in and of itself is an antecedent control procedure that includes a reinforcement
component
• relies on rule governed behavior
•specified behavior will produce a specified consequence
such delayed reinforcement may not work with the behavior if a rule was not
•
established
•the contract itself serves as a cue to perform the behavior and a reminder of
reinforcement to come (can be the interim reinforcer-checkmark, or delayed
final consequence- outing)
writing the contract
hold a meeting- all parties involved
•
• identify tasks to be performed correctly
• identify tasks to be performed or improved
• identify potential rewards
• write contracts
typically involves negotiations & compromise
•
why do contracts work?
• public commintment and accountability
• clearly defined behaviors and contingencies
• compromise
• reasonable goals
• social support (cues, praise)
• ADVANTAGES
• positive
• individualized
• facilitates consistency esp btwn home & school
• involvement of more individuals such as parents
encourages self-determination and self-management
•
• facilitates independence
• easy to implement
• socially valid method
(articles-> get notes)
rule governed behaviors: you behave bc of contingency shapes?
youre going to go speed limit not bc you get a ticket, but ticket would be
contingency for people who break the rule token economy
• generalized because it can be exchanged for a lot of different things
• conditioned bc token is paired w other different items in past, gains value, in itself has
no reinforcing value
• is phased out
• immediate reinforcement so that youre not always giving away bigger reinforcers
• level systems (big token economies)- good for MIC? choose what chores? backup
reinforces, points or stickers for doing things, after certain number of points earn
things, maybe lose things with punishment contingency
• fade by make exchange less frequent when behaviors you want are established
what is a behavior chain
• a series of individual stimulus-response components that occur together in a
sequence
• SD-> blah blah blah -> FINAL REINFORCER
• forward (teaching each step, order) or backwards chaining (everything til the end)->
• task analysis-> break down skills into a bunch of little parts
what are the advantages to using behavior chains to teach adaptive skills?
• teach ADL’s (activities of daily living),
what must you do to develop a chaining procedure
• conduct task analysis
• assess mastery of each step (single or multiple opportunity method)
• determine changing procedures (backward/forward/total task presentation)
how do you determine the steps in a task analysis?
• observe
• test the chain
• consult experts
• perform the behaviors
forward chaining
• steps taught in temporal order, reinforcement is provided for cumulative steps
performed in the correct order
• teach long complex chains as a series of smaller skill clusters. final response of one
cluster sets the occasion for the first response in the next cluster (ie premeal, meal,
postmeal)
how do you teach each step?
• model/demonstrate
• put something together
• pictures, words, (written instructions)
• hand over hand- manual guidance
backward chaining- when you need to complete the task itself to complete chaining,
immediate reinforcement
• trainer completes all steps except the final step
• advantage: leads to immediate reinforcement for completion of entire chain
disadvantage: takes longer bc it limits the number of responses in any given session
• total task presentation
• variation of forward chaining
• each step is trained during every session or one step is taught but assistance is .....
how can inappropriate behavior also be a chain? how do you break the chain to
eliminate the behavior?
• SD causes start of chain
• break an inappropriate chain right at the beginning
break chain by changing initial SD to override other SD that occasioned the chain ie
•
smoking nail biting, obscenity
interval methods
• time sample is divided into consecutive time intervals (10s, 20s)
• estimate of responding
• occurrence of nonoccurence or response is recorded in each interval
• auditory cue
• use when beginning and end of behavior is hard to discern and/or very high rate
behavior
• percentage of intervals
whole interval recording
• record response if occurs throughout interval
• observe during the interval, record immediately following interval
• use w continuous high rate behaviors, such as stereotypy, motor tics
partial interval
• behavior only has to occur one time
momentary-time-sampling
observations occur at end of interval
•
• allows you to do something else at same time
• gives you an estimate
• good for teachers, supervisors etc
• allows you to collect data on multiple individuals, multiple behaviors,
• longer intervals (10, 30 minutes)
• record behaviors that are occurring at time of observations-
• playcheck
• tally how many behaviors, how many individuals, find percentage (systematic way
of doing this)sampling method of a group of individuals
• group is observed at end of interval
# of individuals engaged in behavior is tallied and compared to total # of individuals in
groups
appropriate behaviors: play skills, on task, cooperation
Percent occurrence
• # of responses/total opportunities to respond x 100
• use when opportunities to respond are not constant- restricted operants
• ex 1: correct responses to greetings
• ex 2 correct responses to flashcards or math problems how do you determine which response measure is most appropriate for the
situation?
how many ppl, number of behaviors, rates of behaviors, behavior have a clear onset or
offset, define behavior and its characteristics, intensity, latency, restricted/free behavior,
behavioral dimension (cognitive ability, temporal extent?)
interobserver agreement
2 ppl observing same behavior at same time
•
• not doing it together- independent
• to assess reliability and validity
• 30-40% of the time reliability checks- someone comes and observes with you (35 % of
the time)
• more ioa and more often is more complex observational systems or individual or
severe behavior or individual
mean ioa- you want 85% or higher (with 2+ observers)->leads to more believability in
•
the data, more confidence in the data
• low ioa is a problem
• ioa does not assess accuracy, only agreement
• agreement- correspondence of data from different observers
• accuracy- extent that data reflects actual performance
• computing agreement
• frequency ratio
• frequency counts
• smaller total responses/larger total responses x 100
• % agreement
• no agreement on actual instance of behavior, just of overall totals
• why is ioa coming out bad?
bad definition
•
• familiarity of environment
• hard to stay focused (experimenter)
• self-fulfilling
• if you know someone too well
• if youre angry
• data collection system itself may not be good
factors affecting accuracy and reliability of observers
• reactivity
• solution: have an adaptation period where everyone gets used to each other and it
dissipates
• observer drift
• unknowingly modify operational definition
• (concentual drift exists as well)
• go back, do training, look at everything, talk about it, observe observer, • observer expectations
• experimenter feedback
• complexity of observations
Treatment integrity
• degree to which the ind variable (treatment) is implemented as intended
• threat to internal/external validity of study
• cannot attribute changes to trtmnt
• replication is hard
purpose of lit review?
• 1980-1990
• children under 19 yrs
• JABA articles
• was the independent variable operationally defined
• provided enough info for replication
• specified all required parameters (verbal, physical, temporal, spatial)
was treatment integrity assessed?
•
• reported as %
• monitored as Monitored but not reported as %
• findings
• 15 studies
• 16% studies measured and reported integrity
• 34% provided operational def of ind variable but not monitor integrity
• 9% monitored integrity but didnt not provide data
• 2/3 didnt provide op def of ind def
EXAMPLE
james, teaching 2nd grade, trouble staying in seat, paying attention, & participating
(sarah)- gets out of seat and talks to/teases other students, when out of seat doesnt pay
attention participate and disrupts other kids, james believes if she stays in seat all would
be solved
target behavior: staying in seat
1st: behavioral assessment- define behavior (op def, problem behaviors,
function, escape/avoidance- times, people, curriculum, learning disability,
frequency-> scatter plot)
how to collect data (sitting in seat, par
More
Less