CRS 446 Study Guide - Midterm Guide: Planned Parenthood, Reproductive Health, Intermediate Scrutiny

• School: Syracuse University
• Department: Communication and Rhet Studies
• Course: CRS 446
• Professor: Professor Greenky

Document Summary

Exam study notes: planned parenthood vs. american coalition of life activists, appellant, planned parenthood, appellee, acla, year decided, 2002, relevant facts, the statute being disputed is the freedom of access to clinics entrances. The district court ruled, in favor of planned parenthood, that although the posters do not include a threat on their face the posters were not protected speech due to their threatening nature (ross 6. 10). Acla then appealed their case to the court of appeals for the 9th circuit: issue before the court, the issue before the court is whether or not face unconstitutionally infringed on the acla"s first amendment rights. Additionally, if this speech is protected, the particulars of the case examine whether or not face was an infringement on acla"s first. Amendment rights: who wrote the majority opinion, justice rhymer, court decision, the majority opinion decided that the lower court"s enjoinment of the.