CRJU375 Study Guide - Midterm Guide: Eyewitness Identification, Police Misconduct, Perjury
29 Jul 2017
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
Furthermore, does this violate the due process clause of the fifth and fourteenth. If the 6th amendment right to counsel does not apply, one may still challenge the identification of another, if the identification was so unnecessarily suggestive and conducive to irreparable mistaken identification, that the defendant was denied due. It does not; for a due process violation, there must be police misconduct, and since there was none here, there can be no deterrence effect. If the documents in question originally belong to a 3rd party, and are given to an attorney by a client seeking legal advice, providing them to the government in accordance with their request is not considered to be. It does not, a person may be required to produce specific documents even though they contain incriminating assertions of fact or belief because the creation of those documents was not.
