Study Guides (238,613)
United States (119,856)
PS 280 (21)
All (9)

International Relations EXAM 1 [REVIEW NOTES] -- 4.0ed this exam!

4 Pages
Unlock Document

University of Illinois
Political Science
PS 280

PS 280 Exam I Format -1 Long Essay(30 Points) -5 ShortAnswers(On potential Essay questions, about a paragraph each) -10 Fill in the Blank: 2 pts each Explain and evaluate realism, neoliberalism, and constructivism. Which theory seems most compelling and why? Realism is the idea that the world is competitive and conflict-based. Originating as early as the Greek philosopher Thucydides, who wrote that fear and power govern international relations, realism was made famous by Niccolo Machiavelli in the 16th century with his book “The Prince”, a guide to gaining and keeping power through any means necessary. Realism is an ammoral concept built upon the idea that humans are inherently selfish, and that each state acts as a rational, unitary actor working to gain power, and is oftentimes characterized by a willingness to use force. Neoliberalism is another theory often used while evaluating approaches to international relations. Neoliberalism is an expansion upon liberalism, or idealism, which believed that there were morals and values in the world worth striving for. It claimed that democratic states were more peaceful, that free trade promotes peace, that military power was not quite as salient as realists might argue, and introduced the idea of human rights. Neoliberalism grew from liberalism to accept that there were more actors involved international relations than just states; there were now international organizations and multinational corporations, as well as new transnational issues that resulted in a complex global interdependence. Neoliberalism also advocated the idea of absolute gains-- that relationships between states should result in a gain between all states involved, compared to realism, which was focused upon relative gains, or gaining more than the other states involved. Constructivism is a more recent concept of international relations, and one that claims society is shaped by ideas and culture. This would imply that there are no inherent truths in the world, because culture is subject to change. It also would mean that anybody can shape international relations, because anybody can shape culture, from individuals to media to non-governmental organizations. In constructivism, actors behave in ways that resonate with their socially constructed identity. All three theories have been criticized on various levels. Realism fails to account for the decreasing cases of international conflict, and does not offer a definition of the power or self- interest that it promotes. Criticism of neoliberalism (and liberalism in general) mostly center around the limitations of international organizations, a key facet in the cooperation between states strived for by neoliberalists. Constructivism has been criticized as a difficult field to study. While studying culture, what unit of analysis does one use? Who does one study? Considering the criticisms of the three theories, liberalism stands out as the most compelling.As our society grows to be more globally-oriented, the idea that states must cooperate and compromise to solve complex transnational issues becomes more and more important.As military technology advances and wars can become more and more devastating, the ability to avoid war becomes more important, and is something laid out in one of liberalism’s key achievements: the formation of the UN, which states in its charter its hope to “end the scourge of war.” The longer international organizations like the UN and NATO and the SCO are active, the more sway and influence they will have over international relations. Discuss the causes and systemic consequences of World War I. How does it impact IR today? Causes: o Assassination of AustriaArchduke Franz Ferdinand o Multipolarity(Many centers of power) > no hegemon(World Leader: Waiing hegemon(World power that has world strength, military anf financial power and can generate power) was Great Briatain) o Alliances: Central Powers(Austiran, Ottomon Empire, Germany)/Triple Entene(France, U.K, Russia) o Nationalism: Belief in the superioty of your country. Militarism: Belief that it is good to use force because it brings out the greatness of your country. Systemic Consequences: o Europe’s Self Determination: Europe redrawn -Woodrow Wilson pushing the idea that everyone in Euorpe -Self Determination did not apply to Asia orAfrica because he did not believe they were civilized enough o League of Nations created -Wilson’s organization that promotes peace, collective security, a forum in which all countries can express their opinions(precursor to the UN) o Punishment of Germany/reparations -Germany must admit fault for the war, pay for the war -This helps Hitler build a case for German nationalism and give Hitler cause for World War 2 o Marxism in Russia -Marxist thoughts developed a little before the end of WWI in Russia; has big consequences as the next few decades come Impact on IR today -Europe was redrawn in to separate countries and those are still the boundaries and countries we are currently dealing with -The creation of the League of Nations even though it was a failure was still a systemic consequence because it was a precursor to the United Nations which still exists today and plays a large part within world politics. -The punishment of Germany
More Less

Related notes for PS 280

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.