PHIL 160 Final: PHIL 160 final review

81 views26 pages
5 Sep 2018
School
Department
Course

Document Summary

Jim is a friend (bad) turn in jim. Jews embraces conflict of b/c property morality; acts but no awareness. No action but morally s&m hell arbitrarily (but deserve to go to evil? all deserve to go hell but only some to hell) go arbitrarily. Act only in maxim if it is universally applicable: whenever you act, your act under a maxim. Need help to advance own interests (parents) Duties: towards, respect, develop talents ourselves ourselves (no and gain suicide) knowledge, towards, respect others, charity others (no lies) *hume vs. kant: hume believes need reason and emotion to act, kant believes need reason with no regard to emotion to act. Epictetus (stoicism: = no hedonism, what is un our power. Rational faculty: examines itself & other faculties: [reason] should be only possession. But by all means we can, defend ourselves: second law of nature; we can renounce rights. (rights are not.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers

Related Documents