VicWeek2.docx

6 Pages
97 Views
Unlock Document

Department
General Education Studies
Course
ATS2469
Professor
James Roffee
Semester
Spring

Description
Theories of Victimology Definitions - Binary: o Victim blamers – victims might share the responsibility with offender if facilitation, precipitation or provocation of the event occurred.  E.g. if you’re on the phone in a well-known place and say you’re about to withdraw $5000 and then go to McDonalds. o Victim defenders – it is not fair to hold a wounded party accountable to some degree for losses or injuries that occurred.  E.g. they would say that anyone should be able to wave around $5000 and not expect to become a victim. - Shared responsibility: o Facilitation – victims unknowingly, carelessly, negligently and inadvertently make it easier for offender to commit a theft.  E.g. you told them you were going to McDonalds with $5000 cash. o Precipitation – victim significantly contributes to the event.  E.g. shouting into the phone that you’re about to walk to your unlocked car with $5000 cash. o Provocation – more responsible than perpetrator for the fight that ensued. Goaded, challenged or incited a generally law-abiding citizen into taking defensive action.  E.g. assault and robbery because you loudly said you were walking to your unlocked car with $5000 cash. Frameworks  Positivist criminology: o Finding the causal conditions for criminal behaviour and thus assumes that the presence of these conditions makes the criminal ‘different’ in some way from the law-abiding members of society.  Victimology – deals with measurement of the amount of victimisation, the development of typologies of victimisation, explanations of why some people are more prone to it than others, and the relationship between criminal and victim which may indicate the ways in which victims may precipitate crime.  Conservative criminology: o Crime attributed to choice/pathology rather than the structural inequalities of society.  Radical criminology/Marxist: o Focus on the importance of the intuition of the state and it’s representatives in defining and sanctioning certain forms of behaviour at certain points in time,  Left-realist criminology – reflect the reality of crime (origins, nature and impact).  Feminist criminology: o Develops a critique of the institution of patriarchy (male power over women).  Critical criminology: o Concerned to document victims’ lived realities. Theorists - Von Hentig (40s): o Theory of victimisation. o Identified victims by examining various risk factors. - Mendelsohn (50s): o The Penal-Couple. o Interpersonal relationship between the offender and the victim. - Schafer (60s): o Classified victims according to their responsibility instead of risk factors. o Moved towards victim blaming. - Karmen (00s): o Discusses the development of Victimology and points out that victimologists view the dynamics of the victim’s role in society from a multidisciplinary perspective. Victim precipitation theory - First identified by Wolfgang – looked at homicide (and aggravated assault that led to homicide). o Primary study of the nature of homicide. o Victim precipitation. o Studied victims and offenders as separate entities but also as “mutual participants in the homicide”. - The victim was usually the first to slap, punch or stab. - The prevalence of victim precipitation in murder and assault is contrary to the popular image that victims are totally innocent. - Interpersonal dispute is a dominant characteristic of many homicides. o They were engaging in some way before (insults, etc) and somehow the victim had precipitated it and the victim status was then imposed on them. - Five stages of escalation (typical homicide): o Victim makes a direct offensive verbal attack against the offender (suggestion that 40% of victims initiate the homicide by verbal threat). o The offender interprets the victim’s words and deeds as offensive. o The offender makes creates situation to get even with the victim for the previous insult. o The eventual victim responds to the offender’s opening with increased hostility. o Commitment to battles ensues, the victim is left dead or dying (some 35% of offenders carry gun or knives, and nearly 65% leave the crime scene to obtain weapons). Amir: on rape - Analysis of police records on rape incidents in Philadelphia. - Findings: some 19% of all forcible rapes were victim-precipitated. - Factors included: o Alcohol. o Seductive actions. o Wearing revealing clothing. o Using risqué language. o Reputation. - Offender’s interpretation of actions is what was important – not what victim actually did. - Victim behavior and the situation which surrounds the encounter will determine the course of events leasing to the crime. - Victim behaviour. - Act of commission. o She agreed a drink or ride. - Omission. o She failed to react strongly enough to sexual suggestions. Passive precipitation versus situated transaction Passive precipitation. Situated transaction. - Occurs
More Less

Related notes for ATS2469

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit