Textbook Notes (280,000)
CA (170,000)
Brock U (1,000)
SOCI (100)
Chapter 8

Chapter 8.docx


Department
Sociology
Course Code
SOCI 2P00
Professor
Montazer
Chapter
8

This preview shows half of the first page. to view the full 2 pages of the document.
Chapter 8: How Good is the Evidence: Personal Observation, Research
Studies, and Analogies
How good is the evidence: personal observation, research studies, and analogies?
Scientific method
o Publicly verifiable data data obtained under conditions such that other qualified
people can make similar observations and et the same results
o Control use of special procedures to reduce error in observations and in the
interpretation of research findings
o Precision in language precise and consistent in language
Problems with research findings
o Varies in quality
o Often contradict one another
o Don’t prove conclusions
o Researchers have expectations, attitudes, values, and needs that bias the questions they
ask
o Speakers/writers often distort or simplify research conclusions
o Research “facts” change over time
o Varies in how artificial it is
o The need for financial gain, status, security, and other factors can affects research
outcomes
Pros
Cons
Scientific research is subject to public
verifiability
Research uses control to minimize
extraneous factors
Scientific research is precise and
consistent in the use of language
Research varies greatly in quality and
artificiality
Research findings often contradict one
another and facts can change over time
Research findings can only support
conclusions
Scientific research is a human activity; it
can be distorted and is not free of
subjectivity
Impossibly certainty fallacy assuming that a research conclusion should be rejected if it is not
absolutely certain
Clues for evaluating research studies
o What is the quality of the source of the report?
o Does the report detail any special strengths of the research?
o How recently was the research conducted, and are there any reasons to believe that the
findings might be changed over time?
o Have the study’s findings been replicated by other studies?
o How selective has the communicator been in choosing studies
o Is there any evidence of strong-sense critical thinking?
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version