LAWS 3904 Chapter Notes - Chapter 5: Judicial Activism, Machismo

• School: Carleton University
• Department: Law
• Course: LAWS 3904
• Professor: Collin Fletcher

Document Summary

Richard sauv sauv v. canada [chief electoral officer] Debra parkes: majority of scc decided that denying vote to prisoners violates charter, court reje(cid:272)ted (cid:374)otio(cid:374) that priso(cid:374)ers are (cid:862)te(cid:373)porar(cid:455) out(cid:272)asts fro(cid:373) our s(cid:455)ste(cid:373) of rights a(cid:374)d de(cid:373)o(cid:272)ra(cid:272)(cid:455)(cid:863, 20 yrs of litigation, au(cid:448) (cid:859)s (cid:272)ri(cid:373)e = (cid:1005)st degree murder. Idea that (cid:862)priso(cid:374) (cid:449)orks(cid:863) reso(cid:374)ates (cid:449)/ ca(cid:374)adia(cid:374) pu(cid:271)li(cid:272: per(cid:272)eptio(cid:374) that, (cid:862)priso(cid:374)ers are (cid:374)either people i(cid:374) (cid:374)eed (cid:374)or produ(cid:272)ts of disadvantaged social and economic circumstances. They are rational, responsible, dangerous, and undeserving of our (cid:272)olle(cid:272)ti(cid:448)e (cid:272)o(cid:374)(cid:272)er(cid:374)(cid:863) (cid:894)(cid:1006)(cid:1008)(cid:1004)(cid:895: but, america still has harsher crime control culture criminal code still requires judges to consider all sanctions other than imprisonment first. Sauv v. canada: rejecting prisoner disenfranchisement: fed. Law disqualified all prisoners and jail inmates from voting until 1993: s. 3 of charter = right to vote, sauv successfully challenged the law. Reaction to sauv : prisoners and public opinion: media reported decision as historic and significant for priso(cid:374)ers(cid:859) rights, criti(cid:272)is(cid:373) fro(cid:373) (cid:862)(cid:448)i(cid:272)ti(cid:373)s(cid:859) rights(cid:863) groups.