Cummins

4 Pages
56 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Curriculum and Instruction
Course
EDEC 248
Professor
Lerona Dana Lewis
Semester
Fall

Description
EDEC 248 - Multicultural Education – L. Lewis Fall 2012 CUMMINS READING  education everywhere reveals systematic & intentional process whereby dominant groups organize structure of educational provision that construct human differences as deficits invoked as explanation of children’s poor academic performance  school failure of marginalized students attributed to intrinsic characteristics or social/educational programs intended to serve interests of group  “regime of truth” attributes underachievement of low income bilingual children to deficits children bring to school & failure of school to respond adequately  major problem: when attribute deficits to psychological/linguistic functioning, expel culture, language, identity, intellect, imagination  focus on student & community deficits deflect scrutiny from social conditions  little push for equality of access to funding to raising achievement in underfunded schools o easier to focus on deficits of students that highlight inequities of economic distribution Evolution of the Bilingual Education Debate  some say bilingual education is illadvised & threatens social/political stability of nation  roots of bilingual paranoia seen in evolution of policy debate through 4 phases  phase 1: 1967 – 1974 o bilingual education instituted in late 1960s with relatively little hard evidence o many didn’t like the idea but willing to give it a chance o some concerned would have opposite effect preventing other language speaking students from entering mainstream English speaking America & might give rise to divisiveness associated with bilingualism in Canada o first phase marked by tolerance for potential o rationale not disputed  phase II: 1974 – 1986 o Supreme Court acknowledged civil rights of non-English-speaking students violated when school took no step to help them acquire language of instruction o didn’t mandate bilingual education, mandated schools take effective measures to overcome educational disadvantages from home/school language mismatch o office of civil rights thought it meant effectively mandating transitional bilingual education  sparked outrage among those totally unprepared to offer bilingual instruction o argument saying children can’t learn in language they don’t understanding no longer self- evident o Epstein  evidence showed Anglophone children taught initially in French to develop fluent bilingual skills didn’t suffer academically from home/school language switch o results suggested English immersion programs plausible alternative to bilingual programs o appeared more logical children deficient in English need to maximize instruction in that language, not native one  if not, won’t participate in society  phase 3: 1987 – 1998 o linguistic mismatch hypothesis & maximum exposure hypothesis still prominent o US English organization made English the official language in 19 states through referenda o urgency enhanced during late 1980s by publications warning of cultural diversity dangers o wanted America to reach monoliteracy before multiliteracy  multilingualism increases cultural fragmentation, civil antagonisms, illiteracy & economic technological ineffectualness EDEC 248 - Multicultural Education – L. Lewis Fall 2012 o arguments: promotes segregation, shits doors, nourishes self-ghettoization which nourishes racial antagonism, dooms people to second class citizenship o argument bilingualism shits doors & monolingual education opens doors not true if viewed in isolation o if diversity increases dramatically during next 30 years = extreme urgency to curtail the infiltration of diversity & bilingual education  phase 4: 1998 – 2002 o California Proposition 227 (June 1998) & Arizona Proposition 203 (November 2000) aimed to eliminate use of bilingual children’s first language for instructional purposes o transitional program of structured English immersion for one year implemented o any teachers who refused to implement it could be sued in court o opponents argued LEP being denied access to English & academic achievement o proponents argued L1 instruction in early grades necessary; transfer of academic skills/knowledge across languages evidenced; L1 proficiency could be promoted at no cost to children’s academic development in English; teachers increasing language of students increased likelihood of parental involvement o Proposition 227 hasn’t fully eliminated bilingual education from California  parents can sign a waiver requesting their child be educated bilingually o to legitimately analyze opposition to bilingual education as form of coercive relations of power, empirical evidence from both sides must be examined The Applied Linguistics Research Consensus  bilingual programs for minority and majority language students have been successfully implemented in countries around the world  bilingual education by itself is not a panacea for students’ underachievement o underachievement from many sources o simply providing L1 instruction won’t transform
More Less

Related notes for EDEC 248

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit