Textbook Notes (368,242)
Canada (161,733)
LING 320 (6)
Chapter 8

Soc. Chapter 8

7 Pages
Unlock Document

LING 320
Charles Boberg

Chapter 8 – The Process of Change Wolfram and Fasold, distinguished between speakers of Standard English (SE), white nonstandard English (WNS), and Vernacular Black English (VBE). Labov suggested that we should attempt to state what we know by writing variable rule— (a modified version of the kind of rule found in grammars modeled on Chomsky's ideas.) o It states the probabilities: do this or that at a certain frequency or frequencies according to the presence or absence of factors a,b,c...n. (these factors can be social class, level of formality, age, gender, and race) In practice it is quite difficult to try to write even a single variable rule. o One variable rule is supposed to cover all speakers; either that, or there are two variable rules which interact. Criticism—While the concept of probability is useful in life in explaining the chances of certain things happening, it offers no guide to conduct in specific instances. o Categorical rules ( if X then Y) do offer a guide to, and therefore an explanation of conduct but variable rules do not. o Variable rules just generalize general trends or probabilities found within groups. Variable rules are statistical generalizations based on surveys of language use and they indicate trends or norms in populations. Additionally, "variability" has been criticized as some kind of rule-governed behavior that can also be ascribed to individuals. Bailey and Bickerton have been particularly critical of such attempts to use variable rule. o Individual speech behavior is called an isolect and group behavior is a sociolect. o They propose that each individual controls an isolect of the language, an individual array of linguistic usages which others may or may not share. Each isolect is a lect. The lects of a language differ from one another along a continuum, which forms a polylectal or panlectal grid such that there is an implicated relationship among the various lects. According to the theory, this dynamic view of language structure is valid both synchronically (as a description of the structure of a language at any specific moment in its history, and diachronically (over an extended period of time)) Labov and others have argued that the kinds of grammars preferred by Chomsky must be modified to recognize variation and the competence-performance distinction made in such grammars must be reformulated, weakened, or abandoned. Variation is a linguistic fact and not haphazard and random. We are aware, sometimes consciously and sometimes not that certain variants have more or less prestige than others. We are also able to modify our speech to reflect changing circumstances, and do so systematically. We know the direction of change from experiments indicated above, but we can even guess as to its motivation. 8 –CHANGE Can linguistic change be observed while it is actually occurring? Most linguists have maintained that changed itself cannot be observed. The consequences of changes however may be observable. The Traditional View →Only changes that are important in a language are those that can be demonstrated to have structural consequences. →It also favors a “family tree” account of change and of the relationships among languages. Linguists tend to reconstruct the histories of related languages or varieties of a language in such a way that sharp differentiations are made btw those languages or varieties, so that at one point in time one thing (language itself) splits into two or more, or is lost. – The “family tree” view focuses on the consequences of change—more specially internal change. Internal changes →Internal change in a language is observed through its consequences. Distinction btw two distinctive sounds may be lost in a language. o E.g., In most varieties of English in the vowel of meet and meat or horse and hoarse. Variation is either controlled by circumstances (e.g., allophonic—as when the p in pin is aspired but the p in spin it not) or it is free (e.g., random). External changes →This is change brought about through borrowing from other dialects or languages—it is often quite clearly distinguishable. Some Changes in Progress Labov Variation and change (for not all variation is a sign of, or leads to, change) “Long-term stable variation”—e.g., the distribution of the (ng), (th), (dh) variables previously discussed and such alternatives as the ask-ask alternation, the latter as old as the language. The primary determinant of the stable sociolinguistics variables is social class—the higher the position of a speaker in the social scale, the smaller the frequency of the nonstandard forms. Labov points out that language change can be readily observed today. –The problem is one of identifying changes that are occurring and then trying to account for them. (what sets them in motion, how they spreads, and how they are maintained) Chambers and Trudgill (1998) What they consider to be changes in progress—the spread of uvular r in western and northern Europe. (the main importance in its spread is cities) The strong internal links in the uvular r area are those between cities, which form a kind of network. → These are instances of change diffusing through space. – the density of population and the influence of large population centers are important factors. E.g., City > Town > Village. – a physical barrier (such as a river or a range of hills) can prevent diffusion. Age as a Factor → Age differences are quite misleading. E.g., The use of Like (I’m like—give me a break!) –Result= the greatest use and range uses among adolescent girls but both men and women up to the age of 40 also provided instances. – Indeed like was adopted by people that were now in their 30s. o This is an instance of a language change in progress rather than just merely one of age- grading. The good methods to answer this question: 1) Survey the same younger people twenty to thirty years later when they become middle-aged to see if they maintain the innovations and really stay quite unlike the present older people. (real-time panel study) 2) Survey carefully chosen samples drawn from the same population at periods of twenty to thirty years to see if comparable groups have changed their behaviour. (real-time trend study) Labov’s study was able to make use of roughly comparable sets of data from two periods of time. – Martha’s Vineyard o He concentrated is attention on the way native Vineyarders pronounced the vowels in the two sets of words: out, house, trout and while, pie, night. o He called the variation in the 1 set the (aw) variable and the variable in the 2 set the (ay) variable. o The change was more advanced in people in their thirties and early forties who were fishermen living in the Up-island area. o Explanation: the change was merely an exaggeration of an existing tendency to centralize the first part of the diphthong. This exaggeration is particularly characteristics of those of identified most closely with the island. – Indeed we can clearly see the social motivation of a sound change; the change is one motivated by a desire to show loyalty to a particular place and solidarity with the people who live there. Trudgill (1972)—Norwich England He found that the distribution of the variants of the (ng) variable showed that there were very clear differences betwe
More Less

Related notes for LING 320

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.