PHIL 240 Chapter Notes -Atheism

59 views3 pages
IV: The Place of Liberty
How much power should the state have?
Anarchist says: no justified power
Thoreau
Absolutist says: any power necessary
Hobbes
Mill says: enough to protect liberty
Liberty Principle (Harm Principle): one may justifiably limit a person's freedom
of action only if they threaten harm to another
Condition: applicable to “any member of a civilized community”.
This excludes children and “barbarians.”
Argument: liberty is only valuable under certain conditions, otherwise liberty can
do great harm.
Freedom of Thought
Unpopularity is no justification for silencing a particular point of view.
1) If the view was true or partly true, then the chance for truth or partial
truth is lost
2) If the view was false, then we lose the opportunity to
challenge/reaffirm the true view
Difference between having certainty in a view and for the view to be certain.
What about the objection that certain thoughts can be harmful to society?
(Atheism, etc.)
Mill's rebuttal: the usefulness of an opinion is itself an opinion -> infinite regress
But accepting that, one would have no more reason to permit freedom of
thought than one would have to ban it
Mill: Generally better to have expression of ideas both true and false,
for true beliefs, untested, become dead dogma. “We go to sleep at
[the] post as soon as there is no enemy in the field”
Unlock document

This preview shows page 1 of the document.
Unlock all 3 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

Liberty principle (harm principle): one may justifiably limit a person"s freedom of action only if they threaten harm to another. Condition: applicable to any member of a civilized community . Argument: liberty is only valuable under certain conditions, otherwise liberty can do great harm. Difference between having certainty in a view and for the view to be certain. What about the objection that certain thoughts can be harmful to society? (atheism, etc. ) Mill"s rebuttal: the usefulness of an opinion is itself an opinion -> infinite regress. But accepting that, one would have no more reason to permit freedom of thought than one would have to ban it. Mill: generally better to have expression of ideas both true and false, untested, become dead dogma. We go to sleep at for true beliefs, [the] post as soon as there is no enemy in the field .

Get access

Grade+
$10 USD/m
Billed $120 USD annually
Homework Help
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
40 Verified Answers
Study Guides
Booster Classes
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Homework Help
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
30 Verified Answers
Study Guides
Booster Classes