Textbook Notes (368,566)
Canada (161,966)
POLI 244 (71)

Constructing international politics by Alexander Wendt NOTES.txt

3 Pages
Unlock Document

Political Science
POLI 244
Fernando Nunez- Mietz

Constructing international politics by Alexander Wendt NOTES Breakdown: What unites critical theorists is a concern with how world politics is "socially constructed," which involves two basic claims: that the fundamental structures of international politics are social rather than strictly material (a claim that opposes materialism), and that these structures shape actors' identities and interests, rather than just their behavior (a claim that opposes rationalism). Wendt addresses four issues: assumptions, objective knowledge, explaining war and peace, and policymakers' responsibilities. 1) Assumptions Indeed, one of his main objections to neorealism is that it is not structural enough: that adopting the individualistic metaphors of micro-economics restricts the effects of structures to state behavior, ignoring how they might also constitute state identities and interest. Constructivists think that state interests are in important part constructed by systemic structures, not exogenous to them; this leads to a sociological rather than micro-economic structuralism. Where neorealist and constructivist structuralisms really differ, however, is in their assumptions about what structure is made of. Neorealists think it is made only of a distribution of material capabilities, whereas constructivists think it is also made of social relationships. Social structures have three elements: shared knowledge, material resources, and practice. a) Social Structures are defined, in part, by shared understandings, expectations, or knowledge. A security dilemma, for example, is a social structure composed of intersubjective understandings in which states are so distrustful that they make worst-case assumptions about each others' intentions, and as a result define their interests in self-help terms. b) Social structures include material resources like gold and tanks. In contrast to neorealists' desocialized view of such capabilities, constructivists argue that material resources only acquire meaning for human action through the structure of shared knowledge in which they are embedded.9 For example, 500 British nuclear weapons are less threatening to the United States than 5 North Korean nuclear weapons, because the British are friends of the United States and the North Koreans are not, and amity or enmity is a function of shared understandings. Constructivism is therefore compatible with changes in material power affecting social relations. c) Social structures exist, not in actors' heads nor in material capabilities, but in practices. The Cold War was a structure of shared knowledge that governed great power relations for forty years, but once they stopped acting on this basis, it was "over." Asking "when do ideas, as opposed to power and interest, matter?" is to ask the wrong question. Ideas always matter, since power and interest do not have effects apart from the shared knowledge that constitutes them as such. The real question, as Mearsheimer notes (p. 42), is why does one social structure exist, like self-help (in which power and self-interest determine behavior), rather than another, like collective security (in which they do not). 2) Objectivity Mearsheimer suggests that critical theorists do not believe that there is an objective world out there about which we can have knowledge. This is not the case. There are two issues here, ontological and epistemological. The ontological issue is whether social structures have an objective existence, Social structures are collective phenomena that con- front individuals as externally existing social facts. The Cold War was just as real for me as it was for Mearsheimer. The epistemological issue is whether we can have objective knowledge of these structures. Constructivists, however, are modernists who fully endorse the scientific project of falsifying theories against evidence. In an article cited by Mearsheimer, I advocated a scientific-realist approach to social inquiry, wh
More Less

Related notes for POLI 244

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.