Textbook Notes (368,531)
Canada (161,958)
Psychology (1,418)
PSYC 215 (296)
John Lydon (79)
Chapter 4

Chapter 4 - Social cognition

6 Pages
109 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PSYC 215
Professor
John Lydon
Semester
Fall

Description
Chapter 4 Studying Social Cognition - Understand how people think about the social world and arrive at judgments that: o Helps them interpret the past o Understand the present o Predict the future - Understand how people think about other individuals and make assumptions about them - Show that our judgment isn’t flawless o E.g. we trust people we shouldn’t Information Available - Information can be misleading - Some methods of acquiring information can affect our thinking disproportionately Inferring Personality from Physical Appearance - When you have minimal information - Snap judgment: how quickly do we make impressions? - How trustworthy, competent, likable, aggressive or attractive does someone look? - Two facial expressions stand out: o Positive-Negative dimension when judging whether the person should be approached or not  Trustworthy or untrustworthy? Aggressive or not? o Power dimension when judging whether the person is likely to stand in a status  Confident or bashful? Dominant or submissive? - Baby faces look more trustworthy and nondominant o Appear harmless/helpless - Inferring personality from physical appearance holds a certain degree of truth, yet it is small - Snap judgment predicts more what other people in general think Pluralistic Ignorance - Misleading firsthand information - Misperception of a group norm that results from observing people who are acting differently from their private beliefs out of a concern for the social consequences o E.g. ethnic groups do not initiate conversation with other ethnic groups out of fear of being rejected o E.g. acting “tougher” when “toughness” is valued - Thus, firsthand experiences can be: o Accurate as they have not been filtered by someone else, but generally; o Inaccurate as we are inattentive to information, we misinterpret the event, we judge from one incident Misleading Second-hand Information - Ideological distortions o Accentuate some elements and suppress others o “Innocent” intent or purpose of misleading - Overemphasis on bad news o Media wants to entertain and attract an audience o Negative, violent and sensational events are more newsworthy o Increase in coverage of crimes ≠ increase in crime rate o Effects:  People are more afraid  Correlation between watching television and the fear of victimization o Purpose:  People are more receptive to negative news  E.g. you receive 5 compliments and 1 insult. You only focus on the insult for the rest of the day Presentation of Information - Consider marketing and advertising of products to understand the powerful impact Order Effects - Primary effect: disproportionate influence on judgment by information presented first in a body of evidence o Initial judgment is formed o E.g. someone who is intelligent, industrious, impulsive, critical and stubborn will seem favourable - Recency effect: disproportionate influence on judgment by information presented last in a body of evidence o Last items are easier to recall Framing Effects - The influence on judgment resulting from the way information is presented (order or wording) - Spin framing: o Varying the content of what is presented o Highlighting some aspects of the relevant information and not others o E.g. saying “enhanced interrogation” instead of “torture” - Positive and Negative framing: o Mixed nature of things can be framed in ways that emphasize a certain side. o E.g. ice cream is good, but it has a lot of saturated fat o E.g. you are more likely to use a condom with a 90% rate of success that a condom with a 10% rate of failure o Information framed in negative terms have a stronger response Temporal framing - Construal level theory: temporal perspective from which people view events has important and predictable implications for how we construe them. - Explains why we have inconsistence preferences - Distant events: abstract terms o Next week, I will be dining out with a friend - Close events: concrete terms o Right now, I’m chewing gum - Things sound great in the abstract, yet less thrilling when fleshed out in concrete details Seeking Information Confirmation bias - The tendency to test a proposition by searching for evidence that would support it - People do not seek out all the necessary information o They seek information that confirms their proposition o E.g. you want to know if someone is an introvert and you only ask them questions on social withdrawal; they will only answer things that will make them seem relatively introverted Motivated confirmation Bias - People deliberately search for evidence that confirms their preferences - Information that contradicts what a person would like to believe is rejected Top-Down Processing - Top-down processing: filter and interpret new information in light of pre-existing knowledge and expectations - Bottom-up processes: Forming conclusions based on relevant stimuli from the outside world (text on page, gesture, sound, etc.) Influence of Schemas on: - Attention o Selective o Direct our attention to the most important elements o E.g. you do
More Less

Related notes for PSYC 215

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit