Textbook Notes (373,219)
CA (164,572)
McGill (4,560)
SOCI (234)
SOCI 210 (61)
Chapter 15

Chapter 15: Families

8 Pages
121 Views

Department
Sociology (Arts)
Course Code
SOCI 210
Professor
Yasmin Bayer

This preview shows pages 1-2 and half of page 3. Sign up to view the full 8 pages of the document.
Description
CHAPTER 15: FAMILIES  Is the family in decline? o Socio-structural arrangements are “tight” in that they demand conformity to norms (ex. everything looking alike and everyone acting alike in a suburban neighbourhood). But over the course of a generation, the world of Canadian families went from being structurally tight to structurally loose- it went from impositions that must be conformed with to suggestions that could be interpreted. o Sociological research about the family focuses on whether or not the family is in decline, and what we should do about it. People sound the alarm whenever something in the family changes—like divorce rates going up. o People are concerned about the decline of the nuclear family, which consists of a cohabiting man and women who maintain a socially approved sexual relationship and have at least one child. Some people are also referring to the traditional nuclear family, which is a nuclear family where the husband works outside the home for money and the wife works without pay in the home. By 2006, fewer than 39% of families were nuclear. o Many sociologists- primarily functionalist—think the decline of the family will result in rising crime rates, illegal drugs use, poverty, etc. as a result of less 2 parent households with stay-at-home moms. They want to make it harder divorce. In contrast, conflict and feminist sociologists think it is incorrect to believe that there is only one correct family form, and they believe changing family forms do not represent deterioration— they can improve the way people lives. o The nuclear family was ideal under a certain set of historical conditions, but these conditions have changed. Family forms vary across class, ethnic, religious, sexual orientation, etc.  Functionalism and the nuclear ideal: o Functionalists think the nuclear family is ideally suited to create emotional stability and create people who will operate as productive adults. o They believe the nuclear family serves 5 functions:  It provides a basis for regular sexual activity  Economic cooperation  Reproduction  Socialization  Emotional support o Functionalists recognize other family types as well, just don’t think they are as suited to perform these functions. o Ex. Polygamy expands the nuclear family “horizontally” by adding one or more spouses (usually women) to the household. o The extended family expands the nuclear family “vertically” by adding another generation—one or more of the spouse’s parents—to the household. o Still, functionalists note the basic building block of the other types of families is the nuclear family. o George Murdock (1940s) did a study of 250 foraging (hunter-gatherer) societies and found that the nuclear family is still the basis of family in every society. He said the nuclear family is based on marriage. o Marriage is a socially approved, presumably long-term sexual and economic union between a man and a woman. It involves reciprocal rights and obligations between spouses and between parents and children. o Foraging Societies are nomadic groups of 100 or less people. In some foraging societies, women hunt and men can tend to babies and children. Gender differences do not create large differences in power because women collect 80% of the family’s food. They also travel in bands, and when they hunt they distribute the food to the whole band, not just their own children. This suggests that Murdock’s findings are incorrect and the basis of efficient social organization among these societies is the band, not the nuclear family. Band members try to keep the ratio of children to productive adults low for economic security. The band, not the nuclear family, is responsible for socializing children in foraging societies. This calls into question many of functionalist’s generalizations.  The Canadian Middle Class in the 1950s: functionalism does explain family patterns in the 15 years after WWII. People postponed marriage during the Depression and the Wars and after this period many people married, settled down and had children in an era of prosperity and optimism. Women who joined the labour force during the war resumed housewife roles. The result was a “marriage boom” in Canada, and the second result was a baby boom. Not all women could afford to stay out of the workforce though, but many engaged in an “orgy of domesticity” where they gave increased attention to child rearing and housework.  Trends in divorce, marriage and child bearing show a gradual weakening of the th nuclear family from the early 20 century until WWII. The resumption of a weakening trend began in the 1960s. The marriage rate (the number of marriages that occur in a year for every 1000 people in the population) peaked in 1942 and 1946 and then started to fall. The divorce rate (the number of divorces that occur in a year for every 1000 people in the population) started to increase in the 1960s.  Functionalists missed the big picture because they ignored the fact that the traditional nuclear family is based on gender inequalities and because the ignored the degree to which changes in power relations between men and women restructured the family in recent decades.  Conflict and Feminist theories: o Friedrich Engels suggested that that power differences between genders explain the prevalence of different family forms. Men had economic control, which allowed him to pass wealth on to his sons, and sexual control over his wife in the form on enforced female monogamy ensured his wealth/property would be transmitted only to his offspring. Engels thought that private property should be eliminated and economic equality enforced in order to bring an end to gender inequality and the traditional nuclear family. o Engels was wrong about economic equality eliminating gender inequality—gender inequality exists in both communist and capitalist societies. For this reason most feminists believe that something other than or in addition to capitalism account for gender inequality. They think it is patriarchy’s root in society, not just capitalism.  Power and Families: o Love and mate selection: historically, love had little to do with marriage— it was arranged by third parties and based on economic and political calculations. The link between love and marriage we have today originated in the early 20 century when Hollywood and ads began to promote self-gratification. Love has become the essential basis for marriage. o Social influences on mate selection: although the appearance of online dating increased the number and range of potential mattered to which people have access, social forces continue to influence mate selection. Three sets of social boundaries influence you:  Resources: potential spouses bring resources to the marriage market they use to attract mates and compete against rivals. These include financial assets, status, values, tastes, and knowledge.  Third parties: families, neighbourhoods, and religious institutions raise people to identify with groups they are members of and think of themselves as different from members of other groups. They apply sanctions to people who threaten to marry from outside the group (ex. ethnic intermarriage).  Demographic variables: if you are a member of a small group or a group that is dispersed geographically, you are more likely to have to marry outside the group. People usually meet spouses in “local marriage markets” – universities and colleges, places of work, bars, neighbourhoods—these settings are socially segregated and influence mate selection. o Marital satisfaction: it has come to be about having a happy marriage rather than a useful marriage. Women are freer than ever to leave marriages when they are unhappy. This female autonomy was a result of birth control (able to delay having kids, have fewer kids) and having their own sources of income. During the late 1960s, divorce laws were changing and making it easier. o Main factors underlying marital satisfaction:  Economic factors: the lower the social class and the lower the income level, the more likely financial pressures will make them unhappy and the marriage unstable. Marital satisfaction generally increased when wives enter the paid labour force.  Divorce laws: when people are free to end unhappy marriages and remarry, the level of satisfaction increases among married people.  The family life cycle: divorce rates peak at year five of a marriage, and martial satisfaction reaches a low point after about 15-20 years. Marital satisfaction starts high, falls when children are born, reached a low point when children are in their teenage years, and rise again when children reach adulthood.  Division of household labour: couples that share household and are equal are happier than those who don’t. Equitable sharing tends to increase with education.  Sexual relations: people with good sexual relations have happier marriages. Marital happiness could lead to good sex, or good sex could lead to a happy marriage. The relationship between marital satisfaction and sexual compatibility is probably reciprocal.  Religion: religion doesn’t influence martial satisfaction, but does affect divorce rates. States with a high percentage of churchgoers have a lower divorce rate. o Divorce: the Divorce act of 1968 expanded the ground for granting a divorce to include mental or physical cruelty, rape, addiction, sodomy, bestiality, and homosexual acts.  The 1985 amendment specified only one ground for divorce— marital breakdown—defined in three ways: a. The spouses lived apart for one year, b. One of the spouses committed adultery, c. One spouse treated the other with mental or physical cruelty.  Today, a marriage can be legally dissolved in the relationship is “irretrievably
More Less
Unlock Document
Subscribers Only

Only pages 1-2 and half of page 3 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
Subscribers Only
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document
Subscribers Only

Log In


OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit