Textbook Notes (362,882)
Canada (158,081)
LWSO 2000 (3)

Hart LWSO 2000 Notes.docx

4 Pages
Unlock Document

Memorial University
Law and Society
LWSO 2000
Robynn Arnold

Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals: Hart, H.L.A Dan Kalbhenn LWSO 2000 April/15/13 Grade: 88 % [The following is a compendium of read material, class lecture and personal opinion. Those who use these notes should do so with caution, as the following might stray from core course discussion and concepts.] Positivism, Moral Law and Jurisprudence When discussing what law is and what law ought to be there suggests the distinction between natural law and that of legislation i.e. function of a law that needs to be accomplished for the good of the people but not popular and that of one that is above all or constitutionally valid. Morality is subjective to the individual and proceeds to the state via the social contract reason does not stop because laws are created in within the moral framework, the moral framework of what is good for the people suggests that all laws are derived to the befinit for the social contract of the people as they wish to enlighten laws via there comblined social good/justice. There is existance in which the state does not serve the peoples intrests but lies in the realm of the combined legitimacy to the system and not to the social framework, the social framework therefore while rigid is maleable and bends to moral forces along many pathways. A statement of a cleavage between what is and what ought to be law (moral law). Hart argues that there remained an essential connection between law and morality. Stated that he would "widen his point of view" in order to determine "not whether every particular rule of law must satisfy a moral minimum in order to be a law, but whether a system of rules which altogether failed to do this could be a legal system. Throughout his paper Mr. Hart analyses jurisprudence and the philosophy of legal positivism through social theory and philosophical rationalism. Austin and Bentham as notable authors on the subject of jurisprudence. Austin, Bentham looked at particular laws in refuting the argument of separation .Hart works to refute them by expressing that they might have "obscured" the separation of an essential contact between the two. The Austaunian command structure: i. the concept of a command the law is command issued by the uncommanded commander—the sovereign; ii. such commands are backed by threats of sanctions; and iii. a sovereign is one who is habitually obeyed Hart holds a belief that the monarchy is only capable of creating such long held habits that form into the Austaunian command law. Kelson theory’s on the conference of rights in regards to the social contract: Till now it has been the assumption that the social contract obeyed the function of criminal law; however in a state if we choose not to f
More Less

Related notes for LWSO 2000

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.