Textbook Notes (367,974)
Canada (161,538)
Economics (326)
ECON 110 (199)
Chapter 33

Chapter 33.docx

8 Pages
79 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Economics
Course
ECON 110
Professor
Ian James Cromb
Semester
Winter

Description
Chapter 33 (842-855) The Gains from International Trade Gains from Trade: • Form the basis for all consumption beyond subsistence level • At the individual level if we did not specialize and trade (the division of labour) we would each have to be economically self-sufficient • Produce everything we consume -development of markets within economies • Arise spontaneously due to the gains from specialization and trade • Same logic holds at other levels -inter-regional level -international level An Individual Level Example Autarky (no trade): • Crusoe and Friday are each alone at opposite ends of an island. • Crusoe can produce either 10 coconuts or 5 fish a day (or any linear combination). Crusoe’s PPB: Crusoe’s PPB: C=10-2F (opportunity cost of 1 fish is 2 coconuts) therefore the slope of the PPB is 2. • Friday can produce either 5 coconuts or 10 fish a day (or any linear combination). Friday’s PPB: Friday’s PPB: C= 5 – ½ F (opportunity cost of 1 fish is a ½ coconut) the slope is therefore ½ • In autarky (with no trade) each person’s PPB is also his Consumption Possibilities Boundary (CPB) • Suppose in autarky, Crusoe chooses 2 fish and 6 coconuts, Friday chooses 8 fish and 1 coconut • Shown above at the point’s A-total output in autarky is 10 fish and 7 coconuts • In autarky, we’re left inside the economy wide PPB • Inefficiency in the allocation of resources • What if these two were brought into the same economy? Economy-wide PPB: Economy-Wide PPB • It is clear that the overall autarky production is inefficient since it leaves this “economy” operating inside its PPB. • Voluntary trade brings the two into the same economy. • The gains from trade allow the two to reach the economy-wide PPB. Gains from Specialization and Trade • -This change moves them closer to the economy wide PPB and the additional output is a measure of the gains from trade. • Would arise spontaneously due to the difference in opportunity costs for the two: • Any “trade price” for fish: Would cause Friday to produce more fish and trade for coconuts and would cause Crusoe to produce more coconuts and trade for fish • Both would be better off • They are sharing the gains from trade • In this way, trade allows for the division of labour and generates gains for the economy • We can also see how non-linear PPBs come about (imagine an economy with many people each of whom has a slightly different individual linear PPB). Absolute and Comparative Advantage • In our example above that Crusoe was better at producing coconuts and Friday was better at producing fish. • Crusoe could produce a coconut in 1/10 of a day while Friday took 1/5 of a day. • Friday could produce a fish in 1/10 of a day; Crusoe took 1/5 of a day. • Crusoe had an absolute advantage in the production of coconuts and Friday had an absolute advantage in the production of fish. Absolute Advantage • Aproducer has an absolute advantage when it has a lower resource cost of production (as above) or, equivalently higher productivity (more output per unit of input) • It turns out that this is not really important to the generation of the gains from trade • What is important is comparative advantage – having a lower opportunity cost • What generated the gains above was the fact that Crusoe had a lower opportunity cost of coconuts and Friday had a lower opportunity cost of fish Comparative Advantage • Aproducer a comparative advantage in the production of a good when it has a lower opportunity cost of producing that good compared to another producer • Given the reciprocal nature of opportunity cost, this implies that the other producer has a comparative advantage in the production of the other good. It is comparative advantage that leads to the gains from trade. • Shown in the following international level example International Level Example (see also example in Tables 33-1, 33-2, and 33-3) • Suppose that per unit of resources France can produce 4 cases of Red wine or 2 cases of White wine • And that per unit of resources Germany can produce 1 case of Red wine or 1 case of White w
More Less

Related notes for ECON 110

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit