Textbook Notes (367,852)
Canada (161,454)
LAW 122 (618)
Chapter

LAW CH2

5 Pages
87 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Law and Business
Course
LAW 122
Professor
Joerg Wittenbrinck
Semester
Fall

Description
12/7/2013 11:43:00 AM CHAPTER 2 CASES & PROBLEMS Question 1  Salazar Construction Inc. (SCI) badly run company, generates remarkable level of ill will among workers  Antonio Salazar (AS) founder of company 30 years ago, sold it many years ago, bothers him that company has treated workers so poorly, decides enough is enough  AS wants to bring class action against SCI on behalf of current and former employees: he believes there are 3 sets of claims:  one group underpaid for past decade;  second group former employees forced into early retirement due to injuries suffered at work;  third group are a few female secretaries, 3 or 4, who have been subject of sexual harassment Question: Is AS entitled to bring class action against SCI on those bases? What benefits do class action proceedings generally create? Answer  1. The concept of a class action exists to a multitude of similar claims to be resolved in a single set of proceedings.  The benefits are largely those of expediency and expense. To the extent that many people are pursuing similar claims against the same defendant, it makes sense to save time and money by bringing the actions together into a single case.  Class actions also serve the interest of access to justice. Without the possibility of a class action, individuals who personally have little to gain—but cumulatively hold rights of considerable value—are unlikely to vindicate their claims.  By banding together, however, it becomes feasible for the individuals members of the class to receive the redress that they deserve.  The corollary of that proposition is equally important. To the extent that individual claimants are economically dissuaded from suing, a wrongdoer is able to escape liability.  In the absence of class action proceedings, a wrongdoer is likely to escape liability, despite injuring many people, as long as the individual claims are of relatively little value.  By changing the economics of the situation, class action proceedings consequently serve the societal interest in imposing responsibility for those who wrongfully injure.  Against that backdrop, it may seem that Antonio Salazar’s proposal makes sense. By means of a class action, he could bring together three categories of employees who otherwise might be unlikely to enforce their rights against SCI.  Salazar’s attempt to commence a class action nevertheless will fail. A court undoubtedly would deny certification and thereby prevent him from proceeding. That is true for several reasons. Cause of Action  Most significantly, Salazar himself has no interest in the litigation. A class action is available only to someone who is among the class of individuals with a right to sue. Salazar, however, has no cause of action against SCI.  Representative Plaintiff For the same reasons, Salazar obviously would not be suitable as a representative plaintiff.
  Common Issues A class action also presumes that the claims available to the various members of the class contain common issues. o A class action saves time and money because it allows a court, with a single determination, to resolve an issue that otherwise would have to be decided several times over. In this instance, however, it does not appear that there is any single issue of fact or law that would have to be settled for each of the claims. o (It may be, however, that a much small class action would be appropriate for the members of any given category of claimants—eg the employees who were systematically underpaid).  PreferableProcedure o For all of the preceding reasons, it would be preferable to use some other procedure for resolving the various claims against SCI. o The individual categories of claimants might support three different class actions. o Alternatively, each employee with a valid claim might individual sue the company. . 12/7/2013 11:43:00 AM Case and Problems Case 5  Glenn Brendel (GB)is classical musician who is now internationally famous; his career began by recording piano pieces by Bach and Beethoven – recordings sat unnoticed in basement of Vancouver studio where made for many years  Owner of studio, Trilby Svengali (TS) rediscovers recordings, realizes they have value, releases them as CDs, and go to top of charts  GB upset that recordings released without his knowledge, not paid for them either; TS responds that he signed contract in 1971 which she believes gives her ownership of recordings  GB sues TS in Federal Court for breach of copyright – at beginning of dispute GB offers to settle h
More Less

Related notes for LAW 122

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit