Textbook Notes (381,163)
CA (168,383)
Ryerson (11,724)
LAW (916)
LAW 122 (626)
Chapter 4

Chapter 4 Notes

3 Pages
220 Views

Department
Law and Business
Course Code
LAW 122
Professor
Kernaghan Webb

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full 3 pages of the document.
Chapter 4: Intentional Torts
A number of torts require proof of the defendants intention. Torts that traditionally been labeled
intentionally torts include;
Assault
Battery
Invasion of privacy
False imprisonment
Trespass to land
Interference with chattel
oIntentional Torts: involves intentional, rather than merely careless, conduct. E.g. Defendant
may be held liable for battery if he deliberately punches the plaintiff.
ASSAULT AND BATTERY
oAssault: occurs when the defendant intentionally causes the plaintiff to reasonably believe that
offensive bodily contact is imminent. There are several important points to this definition.
i.The tort is not based on physical contact. It is based on a reasonable belief that such
contact will occur. But, if you punch me from behind, you do not commit the tort of
assault if I didnt know that the blow came from you.
ii. It is enough if the plaintiff reasonably believed that bodily contact would occur. As a
result, you may commit an assault by pointing a gun in my direction, even if the gun is
not loaded.
iii.The plaintiff must have believed the bodily contact was imminent. E.g. you probably
would not commit an assault if you threaten to kick me two weeks from now, something
more immediate is necessary.
iv.An assault can occur even if the plaintiff was not frightened. It is enough that the
defendant threatened some form of offensive contact. E.g. you may commit an assault by
swinging your fist at me, even if I know that you are too small to do any harm.
oBattery: consists of offensive bodily contact. There are several points to note about this
definition.
i.The requirement of “bodily contact is not strictly applied. It is enough if the defendant
causes something, such as a knife or a bullet, to touch the plaintiff.
ii.Not every form of contact is offensive. Normal social interaction is allowed.
Understanding the tort of battery is especially important for businesses that control
crowds or remove rowdy customer. E.g. Night Clubs. The concept of reason force is
important in other situations as well.
INVASION OF PRIVACY
As new technologies continue to emerge, ppl are becoming more concerned with their
privacy interest. Tort law has not yet caught up with those technological advances. There
is no general tort of invasion of privacy.
There are several reasons why the courts traditionally have been reluctant to recognize a
tort of invasion of privacy. They want to support freedom of expression and freedom of
information.
Privacy is indirectly protected by several torts.
A photographer who sneaks onto someones property to obtain candid pictures commits
the tort of trespass to land.
Employees who publish embarrassing details about their employers private life may be
held liable for breach of confidence.
1 of 3
www.notesolution.com

Loved by over 2.2 million students

Over 90% improved by at least one letter grade.

Leah — University of Toronto

OneClass has been such a huge help in my studies at UofT especially since I am a transfer student. OneClass is the study buddy I never had before and definitely gives me the extra push to get from a B to an A!

Leah — University of Toronto
Saarim — University of Michigan

Balancing social life With academics can be difficult, that is why I'm so glad that OneClass is out there where I can find the top notes for all of my classes. Now I can be the all-star student I want to be.

Saarim — University of Michigan
Jenna — University of Wisconsin

As a college student living on a college budget, I love how easy it is to earn gift cards just by submitting my notes.

Jenna — University of Wisconsin
Anne — University of California

OneClass has allowed me to catch up with my most difficult course! #lifesaver

Anne — University of California
Description
Chapter 4: Intentional Torts A number of torts require proof of the defendant’s intention. Torts that traditionally been labeled “intentionally torts” include; Assault False imprisonment Battery Trespass to land Invasion of privacy Interference with chattel o Intentional Torts: involves intentional, rather than merely careless, conduct. E.g. Defendant may be held liable for battery if he deliberately punches the plaintiff. A SSAULT AND B ATTERY o Assault: occurs when the defendant intentionally causes the plaintiff to reasonably believe that offensive bodily contact is imminent. There are several important points to this definition. i. The tort is not based on physical contact. It is based on a reasonable belief that such contact will occur. But, if you punch me from behind, you do not commit the tort of assault if I didn’t know that the blow came from you. ii. It is enough if the plaintiff reasonably believed that bodily contact would occur. As a result, you may commit an assault by pointing a gun in my direction, even if the gun is not loaded. iii. The plaintiff must have believed the bodily contact was imminent. E.g. you probably would not commit an assault if you threaten to kick me two weeks from now, something more immediate is necessary. iv. An assault can occur even if the plaintiff was not frightened. It is enough that the defendant threatened some form of offensive contact. E.g. you may commit an assault by swinging your fist at me, even if I know that you are too small to do any harm. o Battery: consists of offensive bodily contact. There are several points to note about this definition. i. The requirement of “bodily contact” is not strictly applied. It is enough if the defendant causes something, such as a knife or a bullet, to touch the plaintiff. ii. Not every form of contact is offensive. Normal social interaction is allowed. Understanding the tort of battery is especially important for businesses that control crowds or remove rowdy customer. E.g. Night Clubs. The concept of reason force is important in other situations as well. INVASION OF P RIVACY As new technologies continue to emerge, ppl are becoming more concerned with their privacy interest. Tort law has not yet caught up with those technological advances. There is no general tort of invasion of privacy. There are several reasons why the courts traditionally have been reluctant to recognize a tort of invasion of privacy. They want to support freedom of expression and freedom of information. Privacy is indirectly protected by several torts. A photographer who sneaks onto someone’s property to obtain candid pictures commits the tort of trespass to land. Employees who publish embarrassing details about their employer’s private life may be held liable for breach of confidence. 1 of 3 www.notesolution.com Chapter 4: Intentional Torts English courts have recognized a tort of abuse of private information. E.g. Naomi Campbell was able to sue a newspaper that published a photograph of her coming out of a Narcotics Anonymous meeting. A company that makes unauthorized use of celebrity’s images to sell its own products may commit the tort of misappropriation of personality. A news paper that ignores a judge’s instruction & publishes that name of a police officer who had been sexually assaulted during an undercover investigation may commit the tort of negligence. While those torts provide some protection, many ppl still believe that there is room for a separate tort of invasion of privacy. Parliament was considering Bill C-2 which would create a crime of “voyeurism” in order to punish ppl who make or sell images that violate the subjects’ “reasonably expectation of privacy.” F ALSE IMPRISONMENT o False Imprisonment: occurs when a person is confined with a fixed area without justification. An actual prison is not necessary. The tort can be committed if a person was trapped in a car, locked room, or set adrift in a boat. Physical force is not necessary. The detention may be psychological. E.g. if a shopper accompanies a security guard to a back room in order to avoid public embarrassment. Confronted by a person in uniform who is making a serious demand, many people feel that they have no choice but to do as they are told. B/c a police officer has a wider power of arrest than a private citizen; a business person may reduce the risk of liability by calling a police officer, instead of directly arresting a suspect. This tactic will not eliminate the risk. Even if the bus. didn’t direct a police to make an arrest (therefore cannot be held liable for false imprisonment), it may
More Less
Unlock Document


Only page 1 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit