Textbook Notes (270,000)
CA (160,000)
U of A (2,000)
POL S (60)
Chapter 11


Political Science
Course Code
POL S101
Satish Joshi

This preview shows pages 1-3. to view the full 10 pages of the document.
CHAPTER 11 11/05/2013
2009, Iran, Ahmedinejad was declared President once again, but Iranians took to the streets in protest,
demanding a recount (assumed electoral fraud), however, Ahmedinejad ended up being re-elected.
Iran puts precedence of political power on religious leaders over representative democracy
Honduras, challenged own democracy when soldiers exiled President Manuel Zelaya in 2009; held a
coup d’etat and Honduras constitutionally designated successor was immediately given place  Zelaya
returned but never restored to power; Honduras chose Pofirio Lobo of the Nationalist Party
2009, PRC of China sentenced Liu Xaiobo to eleven years of prison to “inciting subversion of state
Sentenced to draft a petition (called Charter 08) intended to bring his country freedom of speech, free
& fair elections, and respect for the rule of law
Sentenced b/c he wanted to move PRC towards democracy, although he struggled for fundamental human
Canada has democratic deficit; citizens have little control over the workings of government voting
turnout falls, trust declines in both politicians and politics, people increasingly believe democracy has
nothing to do with them
We must acknowledge that challenges do exist and that is our democratic responsibility as citizens to face
up to them.
Why Democracy?
Democracy is rule of, by, and for the people.
All adults citizens must have equal & effective voice in decisions of their political community
Democracy was second in history; only lasted 300 years people favoured rulers
Democracy returned to the world after the French + American revolutions
Why is democracy rare?
1. Focusses on capability, asserts that only few are fit to have a say n governing. Ordinary people
should not have a say in the state. However, if nobility had not produced so many disasters in the past,
this point would be more legitimate.
2. If ordinary people govern, they will abuse the power and establish a tyranny of the majority that
will persecute the wealthy and other minorities they find offensive and debase cultural and social
Produces a leveling effect that destroys finest achievements of human endeavor
However, arguments support democracy:
Stops monopolies and one person from having excess power

Only pages 1-3 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Made education universal and provide environments where arts have flourished
3. Democracy is impractical; all right when times are good but when tough decisions have to be made
rapidly a dictatorship is usually the answer.
Achieving consensus is a waste of time
Encourages those to hold out until they get what they want
Disguises the realities of power by letting the weak participate even when strong will win.
Inconvenient if you are running a government; democracy makes jobs harder  demands citizens to
participate, govt has to listen to more people (lobbyist, supporters); democracy makes govt transparent (so
people know what’s going on) and accountable (people can judge performance); also voters can put
politicians out of office by voting
Elections help hold politicians accountable to people and serve interests of the pop as a whole
Citizens can vote corrupt, ineffective, or unresponsive politicians and political parties out of office
Liberal democracy; combines liberalism (high level of individual freedom) with a democratic system
of electoral representatives
Built from idea that not everyone can participate (especially in a large community)
Govt should observe rule of law & rights of people protected  if under a higher set of laws =
constitutional democracy;
Liberal democracy should be pluralist, with many competitors for power
Implies civil society
Citizens are free to discuss, criticize, choose, and act freely.
Democracy and the World Today
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the UN in 1948, brought forward a measure of
how free citizens around the world are:
Free, partly free, not free
Describes extent to which freedoms are protected by state and its enforcement of constitutional rights
Free countries tend to be democratic; India, France, Chile, South Africa, South Korea
Not free don't have democracies (Afghanistan, Belarus, China, Libya)
Partly free (Nicaragua, Singapore); classification of democratic or undemocratic are unclear

Only pages 1-3 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Electoral Democracies: countries in which representatives to the national legislature are chosen in
competitive multiparty and multi-candidate elections, all adult citzens have the right to vote in
reasonably free and fair elections
Parties appeal to voters via election campaigns
Opposition can take power over leading parties
Citizens have right to choose how to run govt
Liberal Democratic Government
Churchill declared democracy as one of the worst governments imaginable; but it is better than other
governments; offers more services to more people
Political Pluralism
Must have centers of power independent of government
Business, unions, educational institutions, interest groups, social movements, media, civil society
Only few of these powers actually aspire to govern, but all compete to exert influence on government
Open competition for power and government actions freely contested in polyarchy (many rule)  not
identical to democracy but is a prerequisite for democracy; if power rests within state, whoever
controls the state, governor controls everything.
People cannot rule if one person in power.
Rule of Law
Building a govt of laws and not men has been a central objective of liberal democrats
Believe that a community governed according to laws are known by all (equal) and applied to everyone
(equity)  offers best opportunity
Rule of law places limits on government as it is too is subject to law. Thus the rule of law is the
keystone of a system to protect the people of the community against arbitrary and abusive use of
government power.
Although rule of law is not by itself capable of assuring democratic government after lost government
society may be undemocratic
There is no universal prescription for what is needed to secure the rule of law having an independent
judiciary is essential. The court system is free from political pressure judges make their decisions
without regard for the government might want
John Adam states that a government of law and not of man means that government should be based
on law.
first there is one law and it is known or at least knowable to all
second, law applies equally to all
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version