Textbook Notes (280,000)
CA (160,000)
U of A (2,000)
PSYCO (500)
Chapter 2

PSYCO104 Chapter Notes - Chapter 2: Gregorian Calendar, Operational Definition, Scientific Method


Department
Psychology
Course Code
PSYCO104
Professor
Geoff Hollis
Chapter
2

This preview shows pages 1-2. to view the full 8 pages of the document.
The Hypothetico-Deductive Model
Its the main framework for inquiry within the scientific method
Steps:
-Form a theory
-Deduce hypothesis from theory
-Test predictions
-Evaluate theory in light of tests
___________________________________________________________________________
Scientific Method
-The concept of “proof”
--> “If I open my TV and find a colony of hamsters, have I proven my theory that TV’s are
powered by hamsters?”
-Falsification
--> When testing a hypothesis made by a theory, we are actually trying to to disprove the theory,
not confirm it. The scientific method cannot prove that things are true, because it is impossible to
rule out all alternative theories that may better account for details of our observations. The
scientific method is a tool for eliminating theories that sound plausible but are, in fact, wrong.
-Affirming the consequent
--> This is a logical error that is often made when trying to do empirical work
__________________________________________________________________________
Critical Thinking
-The Scientific Method
-Scientific Skepticism (How scientists are trained to think about the world, these ways are very
effective in figuring things out)

Only pages 1-2 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

--> It is the practice of not taking the world at face-value but, instead, considering it in close
detail before drawing conclusions.
__________________________________________________________________________
Scientists are trained to follow a few rules, called critical thinking, when being skeptical:
Handling extravagant claims
-The more a claim contradicts what we already believe, the more persuasive the evidence
for the claim must be before we accept it.
Focus on falsifiable ideas or theories
- We only deal with theories that, if they were incorrect, we would have a way to
demonstrate this. We are using a process of elimination. An example would be
creationism, and it is believed that this theory cannot be falsified, because we have no
way of observing it. We cannot prove or disprove this divine being, we can only measure
physical things. It does not mean it does or does not exist, but we don’t have the tools to
approach this question because we have nothing tangible.
Apply Occam’s Razor
-If two theories explain a phenomenon equally well, we should generally prefer to work
with the one that makes the fewest assumptions. ex: we have two theories: the first says
that clocks work through a series of interlocking gears, and the second says the same
except that they’re pushed by invisible pink unicorns. One makes fewer assumptions; we
would prefer to work with the simpler of the two, which does not mean that the pink
unicorn theory is wrong. Often what happens in scientific research is not that we
immediately falsify a theory but, rather, we devise an alternative theory that is more
succinct. Another wording: do not multiply entities beyond necessity. Positing the
existence of invisible pink unicorns does not add anything extra to our understanding of
how clocks work.
Replicate Observations
- Findings must be capable of being duplicated by independent researches following the
same “recipe”.
Rule out rival theories
-How could we rule out the dog suicide theory? (Scotland bridge)
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Only pages 1-2 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

_____________________________________________________________________________
_
September 19, 2013
A NEW WAY OF UNDERSTANDING
-For most of recorded history, people simply looked to their leaders for understanding.
(ex: egyptian Pharaoh's were considered God-men, and Medieval Kings were The Hands of God)
MEASUREMENT TOOLS
-Accurate measurement devices are, historically, quite new (ex: Gregorian Calendar (1582) and
Modern Balance Scales (1700s)
-It was difficult to measure the passage of time and seasons in a reliable way
-Once we could weigh things accurately this helped out in commerce and the economy, because
it was hard to compare weights.
MEASUREMENT TERMS
-If we want to understand the world by measurement our measurement tools need to be accurate:
Operational Definition. These four:
1. Validity
It wouldn’t be useful to define aggression as “the distance you can shoot milk out of your nose
while laughing”, we say this definition lacks validity, which is: the characteristic of an
observation that allows one to draw accurate inferences about it.
Operational definitions are not “valid” or “invalid”. There is a spectrum from “completely
irrelevant” to “exactly what I want to measure”. It’s not one or the other, there are statements or
operations that are more or less valid than others. Ex: SAT scores only account for 16% of the
variability in college students’ performance, but they are still used as an operational definition
of “preparedness for university”. We should be able to take your score on your SAT, and
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version