PHIL 1050 Chapter Notes - Chapter 6: Montgomery Bus Boycott, African-American Civil Rights Movement (1954–1968), Indian Independence Movement

22 views2 pages
Published on 14 Apr 2013
Chapter 6: The Social Contract Theory
P. 91-97
6.4. The Problem of Civil Disobedience:
- Modern example of civil disobedience taken from the Indian independence
movement lead by Mohandas K. Gandhi (1869-1948)
- Another example is the American civil rights movement led by Martin Luther
King Jr. (1929-1968)
- Both were characterized by the public, conscientious, non-violent refusal to
comply with the law.
- 1930 Gandhi and his followers marched to the coastal village of Dandi, where
they defied British law by distilling salt from saltwater.
- British has been controlling salt production so they could force the Indian
peasants to buy it at high prices
- Dr. King led the Montgomery Bus Boycott, which began after Rosa Parks was
arrested on December 1st, 1955, for refusing to give her bus seat up to a
white man.
- Parks was defying one of the “Jim Crow” laws designed to enforce racial
segregation in the South.
- Both King and Gandhi were murdered by gun fire, but are seen as the two
greatest proponents of nonviolence in the 20th Century.
- Gandhi’s Goal: replace British power rule with an entirely different system.
- King’s Goal: objected the laws and social policies that they felt were unjust,
therefore they refused to comply with them. Wanted to change them (no
more racial segregation)
- Social Contract Theory: we are obligates to obey the law because we each
participate in a social system that promises more benefits than burdens.
6.5. Difficulties for the Theory:
- Two Objections against the social contract theory:
- 1) Said to be based on historical fiction:
- Asked to imagine that people once lived in isolation from one another, that
they found this intolerable, and they eventually banded together, agreeing to
follow social rules of mutual benefit
- None of this ever happened
- Critic said: the Social Contract “isn’t worth the paper it’s not written on”
- We are actually bound by an “implicit” social contract
- It is implicit because we become a party to it not by explicitly making the
promise, but by accepting the benefits of social living
- It is not a description of historical events, but a useful analytic tool, based on
the idea that we may understand our moral obligations as if they had arisen
in this way.
Unlock document

This preview shows half of the first page of the document.
Unlock all 2 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Get OneClass Grade+

Unlimited access to all notes and study guides.

YearlyMost Popular
75% OFF
Single doc


You will be charged $119.76 upfront and auto renewed at the end of each cycle. You may cancel anytime under Payment Settings. For more information, see our Terms and Privacy.
Payments are encrypted using 256-bit SSL. Powered by Stripe.