Textbook Notes (270,000)
CA (160,000)
U of G (10,000)
PHIL (100)
Chapter 7-23

PHIL 2170 Chapter Notes - Chapter 7-23: Tragic Hero, Jephthah


Department
Philosophy
Course Code
PHIL 2170
Professor
Donald A Burke
Chapter
7-23

This preview shows half of the first page. to view the full 2 pages of the document.
Summary – Problema I
The first of the three problemata asks the question, "Is there a teleological suspension of the
ethical?" Johannes defines the ethical as universal, as applying to all at all times. The ethical is
the telos, or end goal, of everything outside itself, and there is no telos beyond the ethical. The
telos of the single individual is to become a part of the universal by annulling his singularity.
Johannes notes that if the ethical is the highest we can aspire to, then Hegel is right in calling the
single individual a "moral form of evil," but he is wrong not to condemn Abraham as a murderer.
Faith is the paradox that the single individual can rise above the universal. If this is not the case,
then Abraham is lost and faith has never existed, "precisely because it has always existed." Faith
is a category that is impervious to thought, because it cannot be mediated: mediation takes place
by virtue of the universal and faith is above the universal. Abraham's ethical relationship with
Isaac is that the father should love the son more than himself. Because he does not follow this
ethical principle, he is not a tragic hero: he is either a murderer or a knight of faith.
Johannes presents three examples of fathers sacrificing children without moving beyond the
ethical. Agamemnon sacrificed his daughter Iphigenia so that the Greeks could win the Trojan
War; Jephthah sacrificed his daughter because he promised God a sacrifice if he should defeat
the Ammonites; and Junius Brutus put his sons to death for plotting against the state. In each
case, though, these fathers kill their children for the good of their people as a whole, and can thus
be understood and wept for as tragic heroes.
Abraham, on the other hand, is not at all related to the universal: his is a private matter between
himself and God. He acts only for God's sake (God demands a proof of faith) and for his own
sake (to prove his faith), which are ultimately one and the same. Abraham experiences
temptation, but this temptation is the ethical itself, that which might hold him back from his duty
to God. Hence, the need for the category of the religious. Because speech expresses the
universal, Abraham cannot speak about his ordeal, nor can he be understood or wept for like a
tragic hero might. He might arouse our admiration, but he also appalls us, since what he does is a
sin according to the ethical. The paradox is that he places himself, as a single individual, in an
absolute relation to the absolute: he is not justified by anything universal, but precisely by being
a single individual.
A deed is made heroic, not by its results, but by its origins, by the motives that shaped it.
Abraham cannot be justified by the result--that he got Isaac back--and so he cannot be
understood as a hero. To judge greatness in terms of results is to pass over all the anxiety,
distress, and paradox involved in the deed itself. Mary was similarly great, since her suffering
was personal. She had to give birth to God and yet she could not speak about it to anyone. While
we may not understand faith, we are not excluded from it. Faith is a passion, and passion unites
all human lives.
Comments: Each of the problemata follow a pattern: first, Johannes defines the ethical as the
universal and then he shows that if Hegel is right in this definition, Abraham is a murderer. This
method is typical of the irony that is so pervasive in Kierkegaard's writing. Rather than assert
outright that he thinks that Hegel is wrong, Kierkegaard assumes an alternative persona (in this
case, Johannes de Silentio) who seems at least somewhat convinced by Hegelianism. He then
follows the logical consequences of Hegelian ethics until he runs up against an absurdity--in this
case, that Abraham is a murderer. Johannes never directly asserts that there must be a flaw in
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version