Textbook Notes (367,759)
Canada (161,375)
Psychology (3,330)
PSYC 2650 (228)
Dan Meegan (47)
Chapter

Everyday Memory.docx

10 Pages
107 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PSYC 2650
Professor
Dan Meegan
Semester
Fall

Description
Everyday Memory 10/22/2012 7:08:00 PM Everyday Memory  If X is an interesting or socially significant aspect of memory, then psychologists have hardly ever studied X. – Neisser (1978, coined term cognitive psychology) o Ecological validity  how well phenomenon demonstrates real world mechanisms  Around this time, some psychologists start to look at applied research methods  Sometimes connections tie into similar episodes  Sometimes the connections tie an episode to certain ideas o Not separate file for each memory, rather, density of connections ties memories together o Can sometimes forget which bits of information where involved in which episode Understanding and Memory:  Intrusion errors: errors in which other knowledge intrudes into the remembered event o Participants read either prologue and story or just story o Those who read prologue as well as story made four times as many intrusion errors List of words (Deese-Roediger-McDermott Proceedure)  People incorrectly recall “sweet” when writing down words  People incorrectly recognize “sweet”  High confidence for incorrect as correct (that sweet appeared on list)  Same results with clear warnings (even with vague warnings, trick still works)  DRM published in time when there was a lot of outside demand for knowledge on memory, courts wanting to know about post event information and repressed memories o Adult spontaneously remembers, quite vividly remembers sexual abuse as child for example o Controversial  how can someone all of a sudden remember this? Can we put someone in jail for a crime that happened years ago and the only evidence we have is someone’s repressed memory?  Does memory work this way?  Cannot reproduce this experience (unethical)  Limits in time (takes time eg. child  adult, RI)  Skeptics believed that these memories are false  Didn’t actually occur, can I come up with examples when people recall vivid memories that never happened?  Why DRM paper was so important especially when it came out  Scientists were looking for examples of false memories Schematic Knowledge  Intrusion errors coming from background knowledge we bring to situation  Generic knowledge: knowledge about how things unfold in general and knowledge about what is typical in a particular sort of setting (schema)  Schema tells you how things are normally supposed to happen  Evidence: o If there are things that you don’t notice while viewing a situation, your schema will fill in the gaps with what normally happens o Make the past more regular than it might have been o Bartlett studied individuals’ recall on Native American stories  Often “cleaned up story”, making it more coherent, more sensible than it first seemed o Brewer and Treyens  Asked to wait in room prior to experiment start  35 seconds later were pulled out of room and asked to describe room they were just in  Participant’s recollections of the office were plainly influenced by their prior knowledge about what academic offices looked like  Recall was in line with expectations but not with accuracy o Eye Witness Testimony:  How post-event information (e.g. misleading questions) can influence memory for a witnessed event o Police interrogation o Nature of questions asked can bias memory for witnessed event  Shown a series of slides depicting an automobile collision (event people would to have witnessed)  Then asked one of two questions (both asked to share what they saw) o How fast were the cars going when they hit each other? (34 mph) o How fast were the cars going when they smashed into each other? (41 mph)  Both saw exact same thing and in theory, asked exact same thing, simple manipulations can influence how you remember the event o 1 week later, asked neutrally, if they had seen any broken glass in the slides (answer: no)  “smashed” participants  32% said glass was visible  “hit” participants  14% said glass was visibile  Reliable but counterintuitive findings o Confidence is not a good predictor of accuracy  Jury more likely to believe confident witness, doesn’t mean confident witness is recalling exactly what happened  When we actually know what happened (experimental studies), we see that confidence does not have a reliable relationship with accuracy o Testimony contains (1) what was seen, and (2) provided post-event information  Can’t separate out what you actually witnessed and what was told to you (amnesia patients and seeing pictures during period of time memory was impaired  then form memories for those events)  Incorporate false suggestions into their memory for the event  misinformation effect o Testimony can be affected by wording of questions  Mood congruent memory: not in same state of mind when crime happened, harder to recall o Long RI increases forgetting o Is eyewitness testimony enough evidence to prove guilty beyond reasonable doubt?  False memories can be just as upsetting and emotional as memories for real events  A feeling of remembering is more likely with correct memories than false memories  Ecological validity o Limits to how far we can go in studying o Ethical reasons, cannot introduce fear into the mix  Often done through video  Are our findings reflect what happens in real life? Rewriting Memory  Eye witness observes a workman go into an office, steal some money, pick up his hammer and leave  Later, witness reads a printed account in which the workman picks up his wrench before leaving o Asked to recall memory: witness remembers wrench  Picture person holding wrench in minds eye o Some kind of deception  wouldn’t know purpose of experiment  Memory incomplete and inaccurate, someone tells you exactly what happens, can be nice to admit / change memory trace so that it is more accurate than before o Downside being that it works both ways, memory can also become less accurate Jury Instructions  Can jurors disregard presented information?  Wrench study o Subjects told to disregard written account  Can you separate out what you actually saw vs. what written account told you? o No effect on memory accuracy  Wrench has become part of the story now, hammer is “gone” or replaced by wrench in memory trace  Also shows that memory is good, only problem when info is inaccurate or info we aren’t supposed to use Childhood Amnesia: (Infantile Amnesia)  Autobiographical memory: memory each of us has containing the full recollection of our lives, plays central role in shaping how each of us thinks about ourselves and how we behave  Almost total lack of memories from first 5 years of life o Not all or none phenomenon  Why? o Decay?
More Less

Related notes for PSYC 2650

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit