Textbook Notes (368,330)
Canada (161,803)
Psychology (3,337)
PSYC 3020 (97)
c (2)
Chapter 4

PSYC*3020 Chapter 4.docx

19 Pages
146 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PSYC 3020
Professor
c
Semester
Winter

Description
Unit 4: Police Procedures Chapter # 3 p. 56 – 88 - Confession evidence is viewed as “a prosecutor’s most potent weapon” Police interrogation: a process whereby the police interview a suspect for the purpose of gathering evidence and obtaining a confession. - Overt acts of physical coercion have become less frequent and have been replaced with more subtle psychologically based interrogation techniques, such as lying about evidence, promising lenient treatment, and implying threats to loved ones. Mr. Big technique: involves undercover police officers who pose as members of a criminal organization and attempt to lure the suspect into the gang  has been used 350 times in Canada and has a 75% success rate and a 95% conviction rate - Police officers in England and Wales are trained to use interrogation techniques much less coercive than those used in North America. Reid model: a 9-step model of interrogation used frequently in North America to extract confessions from suspects: (1) Suspect is immediately confronted with their guilt. If the police don’t have evidence against them then they can pretend evidence exists. (2) Psychological themes develop that allow the suspect to justify, rationalize, or excuse the crime. (3) Interrogator interrupts any statement of denial by the suspect to ensure the suspect doesn’t get the upper hand in the interrogation. (4) The interrogator overcomes the suspect’s objections to the changes to a point at which the suspect becomes quiet and withdrawn. (5) Once the suspect has become withdrawn, the interrogator ensures that the suspect doesn’t tune out the interrogation by reducing the psychological distance between the interrogator and the suspect, such as by physically moving closer to the suspect. (6) The interrogator exhibits sympathy and understanding, and the suspect is urged to come clean. (7) The suspect is offered face-saving explanations for the crime, which males self- incrimination easier to achieve. (8) Once the suspect accepts responsibility for the crime, the interrogator develops this admission into a full confession. (9) The interrogator gets the suspect to write and sign a full confession. Μinimization techniques: soft sell tactics used by police interrogators that are designed to lull the suspect into a false sense of security (use of sympathy, excuses, justification). Maximization techniques: scare tactics used by police interrogators that are designed to intimidate a suspect believed to be guilty. - Problems with the Reid model: (1) Deception Detection: detecting when someone is being deceptive the issue of whether investigators are effective deception detectors because the actual interrogation of a suspect begins only after an initial interview has allowed the investigator to determine whether the suspect is guilty many individuals don’t understand their Miranda rights when they are presented to them. (2) Investigator Bias: bias that can result when police officers enter an interrogation setting already believing that the suspect is guilty biases led to coercive interrogations that caused suspects to appear more guilty even if they aren’t. - Police agencies in England and Wales use the PEACE method to guide interrogations (planning and preparation, engage and explain, account, closure, and evaluation) - Provides inquisitorial framework as opposed to accusatorial framework. False confession: a confession that is either intentionally fabricated or is not based on actual knowledge of the facts that form its content; “if it is elicited in response to a demand for a confession and is either intentionally fabricated or is not based on actual knowledge of the facts that form its consent” Retracted confession: a confession that the confessor later declares to be false (regardless of if it really is). Disputed confession: a confession that is later disputed at trial. – Arise because of legal technicalities, or because the suspect disputes the confession was ever made. Different types of false confessions : (a) Voluntary false confession: a false confession that is provided without any elicited from the police. – a morbid desire for notoriety; the person being unable to distinguish fact from fantasy; the need to make up for pathological feelings of guilt by receiving punishment; a desire to protect somebody else form harm. (b) Coerced-compliant false confession: a confession that results from a desire to escape a coercive interrogation environment or gain a benefit promised by the police even though they are innocent; most common type; may be given so the suspect can escape further interrogation, gain a promised benefit, avoid a threatened punishment; include making false evidence and threatening harm. (c) Coerced-internalization false confession: a confession that results from suggestive interrogation techniques, whereby the confessor actually comes to believe they committed the crime. – Individuals recall and confess to a crime they didn’t commit because they are exposed to highly suggestible questions, and end up believing they are responsible for the crime, associated with a history of substance abuse or some other interference with brain function; the inability of people to detect discrepancies between what they observed and what has been erroneously suggested to them; factors associated with mental state such as severe anxiety, confusion, or guilt. Compliance: a tendency to go along with demands made by people perceived to be in authority, even though the person may not agree with them Internalization: the acceptance of guilt for an act, even if the person did not actually commit the act. Confabulation: the reporting of events that never actually occurred - People more likely to confess when minimization tactics were used for both guilty and innocent subjects. Criminal profiling: an investigative technique for identifying the major personality and behavioural characteristics of an individual based upon an analysis the crimes they have committed – Used to help set traps to flush out an offender; to determine whether a threatening note should be taken seriously; to give advice on how best to interrogate a suspect; to tell prosecutors how to break down defendants in cross-examination. - Criminal profilers try to predict the offender’s age, sex, race, level of intelligence, educational history, hobbies, family background, residential location, criminal history, employment status, psychosexual development, and post-offense behaviour. - Predictions made by forensic psychologists and psychiatrists who have clinical or research experience with offenders. Origins of Criminal Profiling: Early Attempts - Attempts to reconstruct various crime scenes and describe the wounds of the victims for purpose of gaining a greater insight into the offender’s psychological make- up in ‘Jack the Ripper’ case. FBI - Development of criminal profiling program in the FBI in 1970s - First time that profiles were produced in a systematic way by a law enforcement agency and that training was provided in how to construct criminal profiles. - The development of the FBI’s Behavioural Sciences Unit in 1972, the National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime was opened for the purpose of conducting research in the area of criminal profiling and providing formal guidance to police agencies around the US that were investigating serial killer crimes. Investigative Psychology - Since the early 1990s, some of the most important advances in the area of criminal profiling have been made by David Canter, the founder of investigative psychology. - Canter and his colleagues spent 20 years developing the field of profiling into a scientific practice. VICLAS: the Violent Crime Linkage Analysis System, which was developed by the RCMP to collect and analyze information on serious crimes from across Canada. - One of the biggest problems the police encounter when they are faced with a possible crime series is linkage blindness (an inability on the part of the police to link geographically dispersed serial crimes committed by the same offender because of a lack of information sharing among police agencies) - Equation of profiling: WHAT (material that profilers collect at the start of an investigation) + WHY (motivation for the crime) = WHO (actual profile) Two Types of Profiling Methods (1) Deductive criminal profiling: profiling the background characteristics of an unknown offender based on evidence left at the crime scenes by that particular offender - Involves prediction of an offender’s background characteristics generated through evidence left behind, relies on logical reasoning, primary disadvantage is that the underlying logic of the argument can be faulty. (2) Inductive criminal profiling: profiling the background characteristics of an unknown offender based on what we know about other solved cases. – Involves the prediction of an offender’s background characteristics generated from a comparison, relies on a determination of how likely it is an offender will possess certain background characteristics given the prevalence of these characteristics among known offenders who have committed similar crimes, major problem is that it will never be possible to have a representative sample of serial offenders from which to draw profiling conclusions . (3) Organized-disorganized model: a profiling model used by the FBI that assumes the crime scenes and backgrounds of serial offenders can be categorized as organized or disorganized. – Organized: well-planned and controlled crime; disorganized: impulsive crime chaotic in nature. Organized Behaviours VS. Disorganized Behaviours Planned offence VS. Spontaneous offence Use of restraints on the victim VS. No restraints used on the victim Ante-mortem sexual acts committed VS. Post-mortem sexual acts committed Use of a vehicle in the crime VS. No use of a vehicle during crime. No post-mortem mutilation VS. Post-mortem mutilation Corpse not taken VS. Corpse body parts taken Little evidence left at the scene VS. Evidence left at the scene High intelligence VS. Low intelligence Skilled occupation VS. Unskilled occupation Sexual adequate VS. Sexually inadequate Lives with a partner VS. Lives alone Geographically mobile VS. Geographically stable Lives and works far away from crimes VS. Lives and works close to crimes Follows crimes in media VS. Little interest in media Maintains residence and vehicle VS. Doesn’t maintain residence and vehicle − Profiling criticized because: many forms of profiling are based on a theoretical model of personality that lacks strong empirical power; many profiles contain information that is so vague and ambiguous they can potentially fit many suspects; professional profilers may be no better than untrained individuals at constructing accurate criminal profiles. Geographic profiling: an investigative technique that uses crime scene locations to predict the most likely area where an offender resides. – Used mostly for serial homicide and rape, serial robbery, arson, and burglary used for prioritizin potential suspects (accomplished by rank ordering the suspects based on how close they live to the predicted home location). Geographic profiling systems: computer systems that use mathematical models of offender spatial behaviour to make predictions about where unknown serial offenders are likely to reside. – Used by police to prioritize their investigative activities STUDY (Bennell, Taylor, & Snook) - Examined whether individuals trained to use heuristics (simple general rules that can be used to make decisions and solve problems, in some instances, a reliance on heuristics can result in biased decisions or reasonably accurate decisions) (predicting that serial offenders will live close to the locations of the majority of their crime) would make profiling predictions that are as accurate as computerized systems - Before any training 50% of participants made predictions that were as accurate as a computerized system, after training there was no difference between average accuracy between the actual and predicted home location. – Results in a debate of whether profil
More Less

Related notes for PSYC 3020

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit