Textbook Notes (368,150)
Canada (161,680)
Sociology (1,112)
SOC 2070 (95)
Chapter

SOC*2070 Readings Week 9.doc

9 Pages
136 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Sociology
Course
SOC 2070
Professor
Linda Hunter
Semester
Winter

Description
Substance Use, Misuse and Harm Reduction Programs Reseaching Dealers and Smugglers (Adler Ch 14 pg. 132-147) - investigative field research is perhaps the only way to acquire accurate knowledge about deviant behaviour - especially necessary for studying groups such as drug dealers and smugglers be- cause they are secretive, deceitful, and paranoid - Adler assumes a peripheral membership role in a groups of dealers and smugglers Getting In - moved to California to do graduate school, started hanging out with neighbour (Dave)and buying marijuana off of him - he began treated them to a fairly regular supply of cocaine - noticed there was something unusual about his use and knowledge of drugs - he always had a plentiful supply and fairly expert knowledge but when tried to buy a small bag he had no idea of the going price - wondered if he might be dealing in larger quantities - started observing his life, his friends were all pretty young and wealthy - never saw them engage in a legitimate job - discussed this with mentor and he got excited by the prospect of living among a group of big dealers and urged them to develop leads into the group - had already done research in the field of drugs, had a generally open view toward soft drug use, and age was suitable to fit in the group - became better friends with their neighbour and built friendships with his friends - gave them a chance to know us and form judgments about our trustworthiness by jointly pursuing those interests and activities which we had in common - one day one of his friends turned the conversation to a trip from Mexico transporting marijuana on a plane, Dave tried to get them to be quiet but they continued - later Dave admitted he was a member of a smuggling crew and a major marijuana dealer on the side, he said he knew he could trust them - from then on he was open in discussing the nature of his dealing and smuggling activi- ties - he was a member of a smuggling crew that was importing a ton of marijuana weekly and 40 kilos of cocaine every few months - the men all had a large physical stature and the women were all extremely attractive and stylishly dressed - Dave reconnected with his ex-wife Jean and they befriended her and a number of women who hung around the dealers and smugglers - once realized the scope of the activities, saw the enormous research potential - different from anything in the literature because of the scope they were dealing and the fact that they were important it themselves - discussed the idea of doing a study of the general subculture with Dave and several of his closest friends assuring their anonymity and confidentiality - they were happy to reciprocate our friendship by being help to our professional ca- reers, in fact they basked in the subsequent attention we gave their lives - began y collecting their life histories in details through taped, in-depth interviews with an unstructured, open-ended format - continued to do interviews for the next 6 years until 1980 when they moved - occasionally did follow-up interviews to record the continuing unfolding of events - relationship with Dave took on an added dimension - the research relationship which involves some form of mutual exchange - they offered everything that friendship could entail, did routine favors for them in their everyday lives, offered insights and advice from a more respectable position, wrote let- ters on their behalf when they got in trouble, testified as character witnesses at their non-drug-related trials and loaned them money when they were down and out - visited him in prison - while Dave was in prison, his ex-wife got together with an ex-boyfriend which was a significant turning point - Jean looked up Dave’s old dealing connections and went into the business herself - she soon moved into the cocaine business which brought them in contact with different people - these people knew Dave and his associates but didn’t deal directly with him - more diverse range of subjects - Dave’s release from prison brought involvement to a deeper level - he was broke and had nowhere to go so they let him live at their house, he stayed for 7 months - watched him go from a scared ex-con who would never break the law again to a hard- working legitimate employee who only dealt to get money for his children, to a full-time dealer with no pretensions at legitimate work - in addition to helping directly through their own experiences, the key informants aided in widening the circle of contacts - they would let them know when someone was coming over that they would want to talk to and vouch for their trustworthiness The Covert Role - the nature of dealing drugs made the adopt of an overt research role highly sensitive and problematic - key informants agreed they should be discrete - for many of the people, they took a covert role - as nonparticipants in the business activities, it was less difficult to be fully accepted - were accepted as “wise” which was there role - in overt position they showed interest in activities, encouraged them to talk about themselves and ran home to write field notes - advantage of gaining access to unapproachable people while avoiding researcher ef- fects but prevented them from asking some necessary questions and tape recording - sought at times to build toward the overt role, and did this by developing trust Developing Trust - can be slow and difficult - met people at different times and constantly had different levels of trust - tried to cultivate trust by doing favors - offering the use of phone, car or home - found that trust in large part, was not a simple status to attain in the drug world - trust is an on-going developmental process - can be re-questioned at any point - not one-way The Overt Role - intuitively feel when the time was right to approach them and go overt - used 2 means of approving people: direct and indirect - direct was asking them for their help with the prefers - indirect was by having key informants approach friends - some people reacted well and others were skittish - varied depending on their involved in the business - there was a number of tactical difficulties - one problem was coming on too fast and blowing it - a second problem was juggling overt and covert roles with different people, this creat- ed the danger of getting our cover blown with people who did not know about the re- search Cross-Checking - the hidden nature of the drug-dealing world made them feel the need for extreme cer- tainty about the reliability of their data - based all conclusions on independent sources and accounts that were verified - first, tested information against own common sense and general knowledge - second, checked out information against a variety of reliable sources - own observa- tions of the scene, key informants reports, and independent accounts (e.g. Jean) - finally, checked out account against hard facts: newspapers and magazines, arrest records, material possessions, and visible evidence Problems and Issues 1. The effect of drugs on the data-gathering process - cocaine helped but marijuana didn’t - primary obstacle was the effects of the drug - marijuana they got confused, sleepy, co- caine their inhibitions were lowered 2. Assuming risks while doing research - most afraid of the people they studied, mem- bers of a deviant group can become hostile toward a researcher if they think they are being treated wrongly - had to protect research tapes, encountered several threats to their tapes - were fearful of the police, worried they would discover their research and confiscate the tapes and notes - held back on publicity about research - afraid of danger of arrest themselves through their own law violations - field researchers studying deviance must break the law in order to acquire valid data - this occurs in its most innocuous form from having “guilty knowledge” information by being present at the scene of the crime and witnessing its occurrence - broke the law through “guilty actions” as well by taking part in illegal behaviour - con- suming and possessing drugs - it would be impossible for a nonuser to gain access 3. Cultural clash between research subjects and themselves - present vs future orienta- tions, desire for risk vs security, feelings of spontaneity vs self-discipline - repeatedly saw dealers act irrationally, setting themselves up for failure and felt a pull between their detached observer role and involved participant role 4. Ethical problems - necessary because they can never fully align themselves with their subjects while maintaing their identity and personal commitment to the scientific com- munity - dilemmas related to the amount of deception researchers use in gathering the data and the degree to they have accepted such acts as necessary and neutralized them - guarding secrets told during taped interviews was not pleasant - using the covert role generated feelings of guilt despite the necessity - also felt guilty about efforts
More Less

Related notes for SOC 2070

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit