Textbook Notes (359,448)
Canada (156,281)
Sociology (1,091)
SOC 3340 (8)
Chapter 2

chapter 2.docx

7 Pages
41 Views
Unlock Document

School
University of Guelph
Department
Sociology
Course
SOC 3340
Professor
Victor Ujimoto
Semester
Fall

Description
Chapter 2 – Classical Sociological Approaches to Education Introduction: using theory to study schools - theories are conceptual tools that provide perspective or illumination - they help you see - sociology doesn’t posses a unified theory that explains everything - offers competing perspectives, each having different emphases and starting points - most abstract theories are called ‘macro’ theories - ‘grand theories’ - attempt to understand vast horizons across entire societies - widest focus, centuries of time and large chunks of geographic world - macro sociologists interested in describing and explaining the casual transitions from pre-modern to modern societies, broad shifts in economic cultures and demographics - would approach schooling – by linking it to broad modernizing forces that have transformed the world – ie. Rise in science in past 2 centuries - ‘middle-range’ theorists: more circumscribed, offering propositions that are geared to specific times and places – particular nation in a time period - schooling – attempt to explain why Canadian higher education system greatly expanded in the immediate post-second world war era - might examine more proximate causes such as the growth of the welfare system, economic explosion of the ’50 and 60’s and impact of baby boom - ‘micro-level’ theorists: concerned with face-to-face interactions among people, with only a partial eye to broader social forces - different levels of explanation allow sociologists to examine various facets of the social world - no unified body of theory is uncritically accepted by all sociologists Durkheim and Socialization: the cultural shift to individualism - opportunities for making choices minimal in traditional societies - religion prescribed what you did, custom and habit ruled rising individualism was central to this radical break - changes motivated Emile Durkheim to address macro-level question: with the transition from traditional to modern societies, what provides for the social regularity of modern life? - both industrialization and democratic reforms had sparked greater individualism - people should develop individual talents and capacities to their fullest extent – revolutionary thinking - Durkheim wondered what was replacing the authoritative voice of religion, which had traditionally supplied the norms that prescribed social behaviour - response: social cohesion - argued against those who postulated about individual rationality, or a social contract, as the basis of society - trust came first - trust was fundamental - trust was ‘precontractual’ - only when you trust someone to not cheat you will you ever agree to abide by a contract - trust comes from individuals interacting with one another - your identity – sense of self – comes from others - you don’t define yourself, others do - self is assembled from the reactions of others - tend to internalize the reinforcing judgments of family and friends and strangers - religion had dictated the individual’s place within an enveloping collective - separate personalities absent - trust a key ingredient in social cohesion - each of us speaks a language we didn’t invent - we think with words created by others - mutual understanding is possible only by using a common language – we didn’t create the language ourselves - language is a microcosm of society - all these rules and resources exercised on the individual an external constraint - these rules and resources promote social cohesion - social norms were essential to providing a moral framework – the basis of enduring trust – within which mutual agreements can be reached (contracts) - our reliance, as social beings, on a community of others provides a moral basis for social cohesion - framework has a dual role - enables is to act by following the guidelines of the framework and constrains us by restricting the range of approved action - schooling was about the ‘systematic socialization of the young generation’ - all education is a continuous effort to impose on the child ways of seeing, feeling and acting at which he/she wouldn’t have arrived spontaneously - morality: 1) morals had an imperative quality, stipulating how one should act: ‘a system of rules of action that predetermine conduct’ 2) acting morally entailed some appreciation for the well-being of others: ‘to act in the light of a collective interest’ 3) acting morally meant taking personal responsibility: ‘have as clear and complete an awareness as possible of the reasons for our conduct’ - education must stress students’ learning a ‘system of rules’ - rules should benefit society (collective interest) - students must not follow rules blindly – must understand why they exist – must accept responsibility for their actions - socialization a complex activity involving important reciprocity between the individual and society - education was the institution that could fulfill this broad public mandate, the service to society - schools were to teach students to be socially responsible, to internalize their obligation to the large community - curriculum should include training in scientific reasoning and knowledge – ‘it is science that elaborates the cardinal notion that govern our thought: notions of cause, laws, space, number’ - before it was religion that fulfilled this - those enduring issues that he correctly identified - recognized that salience of socialization in formal education and was clear about its multiple objectives - proposed an important view regarding the relations between individual and society, and despite its shortcomings this remains a powerful statement of education’s role in the communal anchoring of social norms (morality) - education is more likely to reproduce society than to change it – education is only the image and reflection of society, it doesn’t create it - education plays a fundamental role in promoting social order, giving stability to society - social reproduction, not social change, is the focus of both socialization and legitimation - stresses conservative tendency within schools and schooling - preparing children to take on adult roles implies preparing them for positions and responsibilities in an adult world similar to the existing society - preparing children for some utopian or desired society would be irresponsible since this would be preparing them for a future that may never materialize - Durkheim concerned about education providing an equal opportunity for everyone - education as a vehicle to foster the development of individual talents and capacities - critics of Durkheim: 1) view of society leans too far towards consensus - society appears as one big happy family where everyone agrees about normal - conflict invisible - implies everyone in society provides equal weight – social norms - morality of powerful groups often the official morality - power plays a more fundamental role in the social order than Durkheim allows 2) Durkheim tended to point to the moral order, or society, as all-powerful - society was an ‘external constraint’ it ‘commanded us’, it ‘penetrated us’ and it ‘formed part of us’ - socialization took on the aura of pouring the concepts of societies’ morals into the child - ‘individual’ and ‘society’ needs to be more dynamic – recognizing that people actively interpret social rules - socialization not like turning on a faucet and filling a vessel 3) the ‘health’ of society could be seen as the ultimate goal - critics argued that schools should aim to develop people’s capacity to make the most of themselves - different interpretation of individualism - more emphasis on nurturing individual talents, and emphasized active learning – learning by doing - Durkheim promoted education as a social mechanism to promote social cohesion Marx: industrial capitalism, class inequality, and the spectre of selection - focus of any social analysis must be on the production and distribution of goods and services that are critical to the survival or society - earliest economies based on hunting and gathering - agricultural revolution occurred 12,000 yea
More Less

Related notes for SOC 3340

Log In


OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.

Submit