LS272 Chapter Notes - Chapter 3: Reid Technique, Soft Sell, Confabulation

77 views4 pages
Chapter III: Psychology of Police Investigations
Police Interrogations
process whereby police interview a suspect for the purpose of gathering evidence and obtaining a
confession
more physically coercive tactics used before replaced with psychologically based interrogations
lying about evidence, promising lenient treatment, implying threats to loved ones
a necessary evil to obtain confessions from guilty persons unlikely to cooperate
Reid Model of Interrogation
Reid model: nine-step model of interrogation used frequently in NA = extract confessions from suspects
consists of a three-part process:
first stage: gather evidence related to the crime and to interview witnesses and victims
second: conduct non-accusatorial interview of suspect to assess evidence of deception
third: crux of the Reid technique, conduct an accusatorial interrogation of the suspect if he/she
perceived to be guilty, then nine-step process is implemented
based on idea that “people make choices that they think will maximize their well-being given the
constraints they face”
such interrogation techniques can be broken down into two general categories:
minimization techniques: soft sell tactics used by police interrogators that are designed to lull
suspect into false sense of security (ex; “victim had it coming”
maximization techniques: scare tactics used by police interrogators designed to intimidate
suspect believed to be guilty
ex; making an accusation, interrupting denials, overriding objections, citing evidence
use of Reid Model in Actual Interrogation: many techniques of Reid are used, but frequency varied
across techniques
more confessions being extracted when interrogations contained more Reid techniques
Potential Problems with the Reid Model of Interrogation
deception detection: detecting when someone is being deceptive
focuses on informing people about objective (empirically evaluated) cues to deception
not as effective
more promising approach = teach people how to increase behavioural diffs. b/w truth tellers and
liars
procedural safeguards: resembles US’ Miranda’s rights (ind.’s rights like our Charter)
certain populations vulnerable when it comes to misunderstanding their rights
young people and those with impaired intellectual capacity, John Lee
investigator bias: bias that can result when officers enter interrogation setting w/ belief suspect is guilty
bias that can result when police officers enter an interrogation setting already believing that the
suspect is guilty
mock interrogation study: interrogators with guilty expectations = asked questions indicating
their belief in suspect’s guilt
used higher frequency of interrogation techniques
interrogators exerted more pressure on suspects to confess
suspects = accurate perceptions of interrogator behaviour
neutral observers = interrogators with guilty expectations more coercive esp against
innocent suspects, viewed suspects in the guilty expectation as more defensive
Interrogation Practices and the Court
key issues that judge face with questionable confession: whether confession was made voluntarily,
whether defendant was competent when person provided confession
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows page 1 of the document.
Unlock all 4 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents