Textbook Notes (368,463)
Canada (161,897)
Philosophy (346)
PHI2396 (86)
Dean Lauer (29)
Chapter 20

PHI2396 Chapter 20: Bioethic Note 16 Chapter 20
Premium

2 Pages
60 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Philosophy
Course
PHI2396
Professor
Dean Lauer
Semester
Winter

Description
Chapter 20 assisted Death debate I individual morality Principle-based ethics: oriented towards the question –“What ought I do?” these claim to tell us what is the right thing to do  it is very similar view but it is not clear black & white  What is right things to do? Utilitarianism (greatest happiness theory), deontology (categorical imperatives), divine command theory -gives no clear answers, rather give a framework with which to analyze difficult ethics questions -all linkage through the individuality -the difference from ancient time where important decision is made by us ourselves -what are the point of the studying these principles, if they do not provide concrete answers? -through these, there are more questioning & allow individuals to be more sensitive/informed of how the principles can answers giving different approaches/decisions to make compare to others. -these principles act as tools to expend understanding of the perspectives *however, there aren't absolute answers Utility/happiness – as net happiness Greatest Happiness Principle: wants us to maximize the greatest happiness for the greatest number/happiness overall -utilitarianism supports Self-interest of the potential euthanasia patient –including views from: Bentham, Mill, Hardin -looking at pro on euthanasia by allowing minimized suffering overall Reasoning as follows: potential euthanasia patient has severe suffering that outweighs the potential suffering (pain of loss, etc.) by relations to the death of the patient this claim can be tested by the fact that the family & other relations do not go into grief so great from the euthanasia death that they consider suicide. Thus, more happiness/less suffering –is maximized with the careful use of euthanasia *but following greatest happiness raises a question, can more people benefit from keeping the 1 person alive even if their pain were great pain? -if overall benefit is no-death -then it is better for not take a risk  there is still different view within utilitarianism: ** there is also Empiricism -theory based on science -looking at the experience for sense of right/wrong-pleasure/pain sacrificing/using other people for saving greatest pain Bioethicist Marcia Angell: proposed that the availability of legal euthanasia may have ethical utility psychologically -knowing that euthanasia is a legitimate option may relieve stress & anxiety linked with painful disabilities J. Gay-Williams: views that utility could be reduced to negative utility if euthanasia became an expectation for terminal patients or if a slippery slope were made  social interest recognized Respect for Persons Autonomy: as rational agents, we must NOT allow anything to change our rationality -it is reason that sets us free from nature, from the chains of causal relations & make us autonomou
More Less

Related notes for PHI2396

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit