Textbook Notes (363,566)
Canada (158,433)
Psychology (1,036)
PSY2110 (39)

PSY2110 Articles 11, 12 and 17 notes

2 Pages
Unlock Document

University of Ottawa
Marie- Lyne Laliberte

PSY2110Articles 11, 12 and 17 Article 11: • Two derivations from Festinger’s theory of cognitive dissonance are tested. These are: 1) If a person is induced to do or say something which is contrary to his private opinion, there will be a tendency for him to change his opinion so as to bring it into correspondence with what he has done or said. 2) The larger the pressure used to elicit the overt behavior (beyond the minimum need to elicit it), the weaker will be the above-mentioned tendency. • Alaboratory experiment was designed to test these derivations. Subjects were subjected to a boring experience and then paid to tell someone that the experience had been interesting and enjoyable. The amount of money paid the subject was varied. The private opinion of the subjects concerning the experiences were then determined. • The results strongly confirm the theory that was tested. Article 12: • Both children and monkeys demonstrated a decrease in preference for one of two equally preferred alternatives after they had chosen against it – but not when the experimenter had chosen against it. These results suggest that children and monkeys change their current preferences to fit with their past decisions. • Like adult humans tested in similar paradigms, children and monkeys seem to derogate alternatives they have chosen against, changing their current attitudes and preferences to more closely match the choices they made in previous decisions. • The findings for young children challenge the idea that people’s extensive experience with the negative consequences of their decisions teaches them to change their discordant attitudes. Because children have relatively little experience with decision-making, it is unlikely that the motivation to reduce cognitive dissonance can be attributed solely to past cognitive history. • The fact that both children and nonhuman primates derogate unchosen alternatives raises the possibility that the drive to reduce dissonance is an aspect of human psychology that
More Less

Related notes for PSY2110

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.