Textbook Notes (368,559)
Canada (161,962)
Psychology (1,066)
PSY3303 (29)
Chapter 1

Chapter One- Evaluating Personality Theories.docx

3 Pages
Unlock Document

Peggy Kleinplatz

Chapter One- Evaluating Personality Theories Personality is difficult to define because there is little common agreement on how the term should be used. In everyday speech it refers to someone’s public image. A theory is a set of abstract concepts that we make about a group of facts or events in order to explain them. - Two traditions inform contemporary theories of personality: o Psychological labs and academic research o Psychoanalysis and clinical psychology Personality theories may function as a philosophy, science and art. - Science: develop hypothesis that help us understand human behaviour - Philosophy: explore what it means to be human - Art: apply what is known about human behaviour to make it a better life Philosophical issues on which personality theories differ are: • Freedom vs. determinism: individuals have control over their behaviours and understand motives behind them. Others believe that human behaviour is basically determined by internal or external forces over which individual have little, if any, control. • Heredity vs. environment: inherited and inborn characteristics or factors in the environment have the most important influence on human behaviour. • Uniqueness vs. Universalism: Some theorists believe that each individual is unique and cannot be compared to others. Others contend that people are basically very similar. • Proactivity vs. Reactivity: Proactive view human beings as acting on their initiative rather than simply reacting. The sources of behaviours are perceived as lying within the individual, who does more than just react to stimuli from the outside world. • Optimism vs. Pessimism: do significant changes in personality and behaviour occur throughout the course of a lifetime? If an individual is motivated. Can genuine changes be effected in personality? Some theories are more optimistic and hopeful than others. Philosophical assumptions suggest that things are not necessarily what they appear to be. They are based on a special epiphanic vision, which goes beyond the ordinary perception of our sense organs. Statements tend to be global and do not allow for any exceptions. They are often implicit rather than explicit. Philosophical assumptions are evaluated by criteria appropriate to the special act of knowing that underlies them: - Coherence: is the position clear, logical, and consistent? - Relevance: does the theory deal with issu
More Less

Related notes for PSY3303

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.