Textbook Notes (369,072)
Canada (162,367)
Psychology (1,899)
PSY220H5 (98)
Chapter 6

PSY220 chapter 6 textbook notes

4 Pages
127 Views

Department
Psychology
Course Code
PSY220H5
Professor
Dax Urbszat

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full 4 pages of the document.
Description
CHAPTER 6 WHAT IS CONFORMITY? -conformity: change in behaviour or belief to accord with others -3 types of conformity: -compliance: involves publicly acting in accord with social pressure while privately disagreeing -mainly to get a reward or avoid a punishment -obedience: acting in accord with a direct order -acceptance: conformity that involves both acting and believing in accord with social pressure WHAT ARE THE CLASSIC CONFORMITY AND OBEDIENCE STUDIES? Sherif’s studies of norm formation -experiment: participants in dark room and see light 5m in front of them which moves around and then shuts off -have to determine how far it moved...then repeat -the next day come back and perform the same experiment with 2 other participants with you -answers changed and eventually a group norm typically emerged -when retested alone a year later estimates followed the group norm -confederate: accomplice of the experimenter -mood linkage: people within groups tend to share up/down moods -the chameleon effect: imitate unconsciously an automatic behaviour that would incline you to feel what the other person feels -a study done showed that your mimicry would also incline the other person to like you Asch’s studies of group pressure th -experiment: participants are sitting 6 in a row of 7 people and have to choose which of the comparison lines are the same as the standard line....everyone says “line 2” for example -next trials are the same...everyone agrees -then the 5 people before choose a line that to you obviously doesn’t match -3/4 of the tested individuals conformed at least once -those who answered alone in the control group were correct more than 99% of the time -37% of the responses were conforming  most people tell the truth even when others don’t Milgram’s obedience studies -experiment: confederate is learner, participant is the teacher -teacher tries to teach the learner pairs of words and delivers shocks of increasing intensity when the learner (in a separate room) gets a question wrong -the learner (actually the confederate) displays more verbal signs of agony and pain as the intensity of the shocks increase -when the teacher asks to end the experiment the experimenter uses 4 verbal prods: 1) please continue 2) the experiment requires that you continue 3) it is absolutely essential that you continue 4) you have no other choice; you must go on -participants were 40 men between the ages of 20 – 50 -65% went all the way to 450 volts on the learner -experiment: learner strapped to chair and protests even more compelling as well as a mention of a heart condition -Teacher also overheard that shocks will cause no permanent tissue damage -out of 40 men tested, 63% fully complied with the experimenter’s demands -similar studies performed on women showed that compliance rates were similar to men’s -the ethics of Milgram’s studies -“learner” never received a shock – actually a tape recorder -some critics say that Milgram stressed the participants against their will and many of the teachers did experience agony -however 84% who were surveyed after the experiment said they were glad to have been a part of the experiment...1% regretted volunteering -40 individuals who showed the most suffering were interviewed by a psychiatrist a year later and concluded that no harm had been done What breeds obedience? -4 factors that determined the level of obedience: -victim’s emotional distance -authority’s closeness/legitimacy -if the authority was part of a respected institution -liberating effects of a disobedient fellow participant -the victim’s distance -nearly all of Milgram’s participants obeyed until the end if the teacher and learner were in separate rooms and no complaints could be heard from the learner -when in the same room 40% obeyed right to the end -30% obeyed right to the end when forced to put learner’s hand on a shock plate -people act more compassionately toward those who are personalized -closeness and legitimacy of the authority -obedience fell to 21% in Milgram’s studies when commands were given over the telephone -other studies confirmed that when the person who is making a request is physically close then compliance increases -authority must be perceived as legitimate -80% of the teachers refused when the experimenter was called out of the room and replaced by a clerk -institutional authority -experiment performed at Yale 65% obeyed -performed at Bridgeport 48% obeyed -the liberating effects of group influence -more likely to refuse if someone else does too Reflections on the classic studies -Asch and Milgram studies show that compliance can take precedence over moral sense -behaviour and attitudes -if Milgram’s experiment was to deliver a 330 volt shock after the first wrong answer you’re probably less likely to do it -foot-in-the-door
More Less
Unlock Document

Only page 1 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit