Textbook Notes (368,426)
Canada (161,877)
Psychology (1,899)
PSY240H5 (135)
Chapter 4

PSY240 - Chapter 4 (part 2)

9 Pages
131 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PSY240H5
Professor
Ayesha Khan
Semester
Fall

Description
CHAPTER 4 (continued) Psychological Tests • more indirect means of assessing psychological characteristics • standardized sets of procedures/tasks for obtaining samples of behaviour o individual’s responses to the stimuli compared with others’ who have comparable demographic characteristics (using test norms/test score distributions) o based on this can infer how much a person’s psychological qualities differ from those of a reference group o characteristics that the tests can measure include: coping patterns, motive patterns, personality characteristics, role behaviours, values, levels of depression/anxiety and intellectual functioning • more precise and often more reliable than interviews/some observation techniques • however, depends on the competence of the clinician who interprets them • useful diagnostic tools BOX 4.2 – Developments in Practice – The Automated Practice: Use of the Comp in Psychological Testing • comps used to gather info from an individual and to assemble and evaluate it • comps can o supply a probable diagnosis o indicate likelihood of certain kinds of behaviour o suggest appropriate form of treatment o predict the outcome o print out summary report o be more efficient and accurate in recalling stored material • however some practitioners don’t use comps b/c of the following possible reasons: o practitioners trained before the comp age may feel uncomfortable with them o many practitioners limit their practice to psychological treatment and do not do much pretreatment assessments o impersonal look of the booklets and answer sheets is inconsistent w/ the image and style of warm and personal engagement they hope to convey o some concerned with ethical implications  potential threats to confidentiality  lack of training in comp testing for many psychologists  lack of research validating comp-generated interpretations of test results Intelligence Tests • examples of tests that are widely used in clinical settings: o Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-IV) o Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale • Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale o probably the most commonly used for measuring intelligence  4 scales:  verbal comprehension  perceptual reasoning  working memory  processing speed o 15 subtests  Vocabulary (verbal comprehension): list of words to define, presented orally to the individual; task evaluates knowledge of vocab, which has been shown to be highly related to general intelligence  Digit Span (working memory): tests short-term memory; sequence of numbers is administered orally; individual asked to repeat the digits in the order administered; another task involves the individual remembering the numbers, reversing the order and saying it • intelligence tests such as WISC, WAIS and the Stanford Binet typically require 2-3 hrs to administer o in many clinical situations, administer portions of a test Projective Personality Tests • personality tests are either projective or objective measures • Projective tests – unstructured tests b/c they rely on various ambiguous stimuli such as inkblots and vague pics and that the responses are not limited • can reveal one’s personal preoccupations, conflicts, motives, coping techniques and other personality characteristics • assumption: in trying to make sense of vague stimuli, individuals “project” their own probs, motives and wishes into the situation • stimuli are fixed and largely the same for all subjects, which allows one to determine the normative range of responses; this helps to identify objectively deviant responses • aim of the tests: discover the ways in which an individual’s past learning and personality structure lead him/her to organize and perceive ambiguous info from the env. • commonly used projective tests o Rorschach Inkblot Test o Thematic Apperception Test o sentence completion tests The Rorschach • Rorschach test o use is complicated o requires considerable training o methods of administering it vary  some take several hours o results can be unreliable b/c subjective o not used much today in mental health facilities • a comp. based interpretation system has been developed o Exner Comprehensive Rorschach System  provides scoring summaries and a list of likely personality descriptions and references about a person’s adjustment based on the input of stored Rorschach responses  found to be fairly reliable The Thematic Apperception Test • Thematic Apperception Test • widely used in clinical practice and personality research • uses a series of pics, some highly representation, others quite abstract about which a subject is told to make up stories • content of the pics – much of it depicts people in various contexts, highly ambiguous about actions and motives, so subjects believed to project their own conflicts and worries onto it • several scoring and interpretation systems have been developed to focus on diff aspects of stories o ex. expression of needs, person’s perception of reality and person’s fantasies o time consuming, so often clinician simply makes a qualitative and subjective determination of how the story content reflects the person’s underlying traits, motives and preoccupations (therefore room for error) • DISADV • takes take to administer • pics look dated Case Study – David’s TAT response • 15 yr old boy • looked at a TAT card that had a boy staring at a violin on a table • David’s story o boy had a machine gun, took it to school and shot people; then everybody left him alone because they knew he had the gun in his locker • this shows that David was experiencing a high level of frustration and anger in his life; was feeling threatened by everyone around him Sentence Completion Test • several such tests have been designed for children. adolescents and adults • somewhat more structured that Rorschach and most other projective tests • help examiners pinpoint imp clues to an individual’s probs, attitudes and symptoms through the content of their responses • interpretation of responses is generally subjective and unreliable Objective Personality Tests • objective tests – structured • typically use questionnaires, self-reports, rating scales • allows for quantification of data • more precise and reliable The MMPI • MMPI – Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory • in many ways, it is a prototype and standard • most widely used for clinical assessment and psychopathology research • widely used internationally too • original MMPI was a self-report questionnaire that had items that subjects had to state were T/F The Clinical Scales of the MMPI • form of selecting scorable items was known as “empirical keying” • Validity Scale o Lie Scale – measures tendency to claim excessive virtue/to try to present an overall favourable image • Clinical Scales • Special Scales Criticisms of the MMPI • some psychodynamically oriented clinicians o feel that the MMPI is superficial and does not reflect complexities of an individual • some behaviourally oriented… o believe it is too oriented toward measuring unobservable “mentalistic” constructs • revised versions have been validated in several clinical studies Box – 4.3 – Developments in Practice – Esteban’s MMPI-2 Profile and Computer-Based Report • Esteban was first tested with the original MMPI Advantages and Limitations of Objective Personality Tests • cost-effective • highly reliable • objective • can be scored and interpreted by a comp if desired • computer-based MMPI interpretation systems typically employ powerful actuarial procedures o descriptions of actual behaviour/other established characteristics of many subjects with particular patterns of tests scores stored in the comp o when a person has one of these test score patterns, the appropriate description is printed  disadvantages • cannot integrate descriptions o so imp that a professional further interprets assessment • time-consuming • expensive A Psychological Case Study: Esteban • Esteban – • his probs involved both psychological and organic elements • was from South America and assessment was done in both Eng. and Spanish Social History • had become disruptive in school • loud, obnoxious behaviour in class • arguing with his roommates • kicked out of his program at uni • also had severe headaches and confused thinking • his parents were wealthy and arranged for an examination • diagnosed as having some “diffuse” brain impairment Interviews and Behaviour Observations • disorganized, distractible • interrupted his own convo with random impulses • talked incessantly, often loudly • not at all defensive about his probs • talked freely about his symptoms and attitudes • behaviour resembled that of a hyperactive child – excitable, impulsive and immature • didn’t report hallucinations/delusions and was in touch with reality • related well w/ interviewer • seem to enjoy session and expressed i
More Less

Related notes for PSY240H5

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit