Textbook Notes (368,436)
Canada (161,878)
Sociology (1,513)
SOC310H5 (39)

January 4th.docx

3 Pages
Unlock Document

Zachary Levinsky

January 4 th MINAKER & HOGEVEEN – CHAPTER 1 - Young Offenders Act (YOA): old law governing youth crime. - It was widely held that youth were “out of control” and that they could not be held accountable under the YOA and that new justice legislation was required. - It wasn’t that youth crime was increasing. It was that problems were being constructed and being responded to. - Three main arguments: o The way social problem is defined has a profound impact for how groups, individuals and social institutions react and respond to it. o The main issue is not youth crime per se, but the relationship between youth, crime and society.  Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA): current law governing youth crime.  Youth defined as those from 12-17. Includes those in mid-twenties who are serving youth sentences  Practices of governance: what is done in response to youth crime.  Rationalities of governance: why it is done.  Social conditions: cultural, historical, political and social context. o Our view of praxis.  Marxian praxis: knowledge shouldn’t simply exist for its own sake but should be used for social transformation.  Our view of praxis is not simply tied to social change. Rather, its one of social justice.  Social justice praxis (critical approach): aimed at addressing the systemic conditions of marginalization, exclusion and social inequality that lead the involvement of youth crime in the first place. Its about making meaningful changes to improve the life chances of young people. - “Praxis of possibility”: encouraging a process of critical reflection and social engagement of what could be. - Youth are suffering – homeless, no food, no job, no positive role models, etc. This must be attended to solve the problem. Rather than looking to “cops, court and corrections”. - There are many knowledge claims that pervade public consciousness. o There are two main discourses; media and popular discourses. - Media discourses: involves news and entertainment. The two are not easily distinguished ex. Shows like Law and Order. Media often misrepresents real youth crime existence. There are very low levels of lethal violence in school, for example, but the media hypes it up. The public digests and interprets this information. - Popular discourse: refers to all that is said about a topic by members of a particular culture and society at any given historical moment. In NA, talk about youth crime has increased since the 80s. Popular discourse can be divided between gossip and urban legend. This involves circulation of stories, which may or may not be true between family, friends, relatives, etc. Sometimes moral panics occur when an issue is exaggerated. - The general public thinks that there is much more youth crime than there really is. They also underestimate the severity of penalties. Almost 80% of Canadians think the system is too lenient. Therefore there is a gap between our understanding of youth crime and our response to it. Gap between rhetoric and reality. - Youth crime rate measure only those instances that come to the attention of the police. - “Nasty girl” phenomenon wher
More Less

Related notes for SOC310H5

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.