Chapter 31 Textbook Notes

11 Pages
104 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Biological Sciences
Course
BIOA02H3
Professor
Kamini Persaud
Semester
Winter

Description
31.1 What Evidence Indicates the Animals Are Monophyletic? What traits distinguish the animals from the other groups of organisms? In contrast to the Bacteria, Archaea, and most microbial eukaryotes, all animals are multicellular. Animal life cycles feature complex patterns of development from a single-celled zygote into a multicellular adult. In contrast to most plants, all animals are heterotrophs. Animals are able to synthesize very few organic molecules from inorganic chemicals, so they must take in nutrients from their environment. The fungi are also heterotrophs. In contrast to the fungi, however, animals use internal processes to break down materials from their environment into the organic molecules they need most. Most animals ingest food into an internal gut that is continuous with the outside environment, in which digestion takes place. In contrast toplants, most animals can move. Animals must move to find food or bring food to them. Animals have specialized muscle tissues that allow them to move, and many animal body plans are specialized for movement. Animal monophyly is supported by gene sequences and morphology The most convincing evidence that all the organisms considered to be animals share a common ancestor comes from their many shared derived molecular and morphological traits. Many gene sequences, such as the ribosomal RNA genes, support the monophyly of animals. Animals display similarities in the organization and function of their Hox genes. Animals have unique types of junctions between their cells ( tight junctions, desmosomes, and gap junctions). Animals have a common set of extracellular matrix molecules, including collagen and proteoglycans. Although there are animals in a few clades that lack one or another of these synapomorphies, these species apparently once possessed the traits and lost them during their later evolution. The ancestor of the animal clade was probably a colonial flagellated protist similar to existing colonial choanoflagellates. The most reasonable current scenario postulates a choanoflagellate lineage in which certain cells within the colony began to be specializedsome for movement, others for nutrition, others for reproduction, and so on. Once this functional specialization had begun, cells could have continued to differentiate. Coordination among groups of cells could have improved by means of specific regulatory molecules that guided the differentiation and migration of cells in developing embryos. Such coordinated groups of cells eventually evolved into the larger and more complex organisms that we call animals. More than a million animal species have been named and described, and there are doubtless millions of living species that have yet to be named. The synapomorphies that indicate animal monophyly cannot be used to infer evolutionary relationships among animals, because nearly all animals have them. It just gives clues if an organism is an animal or not. Clues to the evolutionary relationships among animal groups thus must be sought in derived traits that are found in some groups but not in others. Such characteristics can be found in fossils, in patterns of embryonic development, in the morphology and physiology of living animals, in the structure of animal molecules, and in the genomes of animals (for example, in mitochondrial and ribosomal RNA genes). Developmental patterns show evolutionary relationships among animals Differences in patterns of embryonic development traditionally provided some of the most important clues to animal phylogeny, although analyses of gene sequences are now showing that some developmental patterns are more evolutionarily labile than previously thought. www.notesolution.comThe first few cell divisions of a zygote are known as cleavage. In general, the number of cells in the embryo doubles with each cleavage. A number of different cleavage patterns exist among animals. Cleavage patterns are influenced by the configuration of the yolk, the nutritive material that nourishes the growing embryo. In reptiles, for example, the presence of a large body of a cellular yolk within the fertilized egg creates an incomplete cleavage pattern in which the dividing cells form an embryo on top of the yolk mass. In echinoderms such as sea urchins, small yolk particles are evenly distributed throughout the egg cytoplasm, so cleavage is complete, with the fertilized egg cell dividing in an even pattern known as radial cleavage. Radial cleavage is the ancestral condition for eumetazoans, so it is found among many protostomes and diploblastic animals as well as deuterostomes. Spiral cleavage, a complicated derived permutation of radial cleavage, is found among many lophotrochozoans, such as earthworms and clams. Lophotrochozoans with spiral cleavage are thus sometimes known as spiralians. The early branches of the ecdysozoans have radial cleavage, although most ecdysozoans have an idiosyncratic cleavage pattern that is neither radial nor spiral in organization. During the early development of most animals, distinct layers of cells form. These cell layers differentiate into specific organs and organ systems as development continues. The embryos of diploblastic animals have only two of these cell layers: an outer ectoderm and an inner endoderm. The embryos of triploblastic animals have, in addition to ectoderm and endoderm, a third distinct cell layer, the mesoderm, which lies between the ectoderm and the endoderm. The existence of three cell layers is a synapomorphy of triploblastic animals, whereas the paraphyletic diploblastic animals (ctenophores and cnidarians) exhibit the ancestral condition. During early development in many animals, a hollow ball one cell thick indents to form a cup-shaped structure. This process is known as gastrulation. The opening of the cavity formed by this indentation is called the blastopore. The pattern of development after formation of the blastopore has been used to divide the triploblastic animals into two major groups. Among members of the first group, the protostomes, the mouth arises from the blastopore; the anus forms later. This appears to be the derived condition. Among the deuterostomes, the blastopore becomes the anus; the mouth forms later. This is thought to be the ancestral condition. We now know that the developmental patterns of animals are more varied than suggested by this simple dichotomy, but the protostomes and deuterostomes are still recognized as distinct animal clades based upon sequence similarities of their genes. www.notesolution.com
More Less

Related notes for BIOA02H3

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit