Textbook Notes (362,988)
Canada (158,130)
HLTC02H3 (51)
Chapter 6

Chapter 6.docx

6 Pages
Unlock Document

University of Toronto Scarborough
Health Studies
Toba Bryant

Chapter 6 Engendering evidence; Transforming Economic Evaluations  2 important issues are currently at the forefront of Canadian health policy; fiscal consideration and gender inequalities in health, particularly those affecting women. In evolving fiscal culture in which cost containment and reduced public health expenditures are prevalent.  As result evidence based medicine (EBM) and evidence based policy making (EBP), which claim to reduce waste are seen as essential to the health sector.  The argument that we make in this chapter is that if evidence based policy is to be sufficient, effective and specifically beneficially to women’s health, work needs to be done to better understand the gender and diversity biases inherent in the methods of economic evaluations.  Our goal is not to reject economic evaluations but instead to explore how they can be strengthened. Evidence Based Medicine  Evidence based medicine (EBM) is premised on the idea that scientific medical knowledge exists in some way uncontaminated by social life and it can be applied unproblematically to the human being.  Its perceived benefits are improved treatment, greater openness in clinical decision making and better informed patients regarding the potential benefits and harms of different treatments.  Feminists have observed that emotion and intuition have little legitimate place in EBM ((Armstrong 2001)  And yet intuitive insights are commonplace in general practice,clinical decision making is entirely a logical and deductive process.  The problem of this gender exclusive research is two fold :it perpetuates the myth that cardiovascular disease is a man's disease and by applying the findings to the female population , it leads to faulty understanding and responsiveness to women's Cvd. .   Current approaches to producing evidence reinforce the traditional biases of the biomedical model .As Rogers (2004) observes,EBM is superimposed upon here t medical practice(informed by a biochemical framework) repeating Nd reinforcing existing biases against women both in research and in treatment .  EBM neglects gendered differences in the causes of ill health  Evidence Based Policy  Evidence based policy EBP is qualitative different from EBM ( black, 2001)  It is different because it concerns decisions at the population policy level rather than the individual clinical level EBP health is Health policy reform, including discussions on health priorities, have been undertaken without a requisite evidence based  Because evidence based health policy is the prices of finding, appraising and interpreting reaserch according to an explicit set of decision results and statistical and epidemiological techniques.  It is thought to provide the needed information to ensure both scientifically sound and phi socially prudent decisions  EVP Encourages investment into treatments , programs and policy's that will work  Evidence based health policy,economic evaluations and ethics   Health policy can be defined as those actions of government and other actors in society that are aimed at improving the health of populations   Rising health care costs an aging population,grieving pressures on the health care system   Limited health resources are all contributing to the increased interest in economic info   Economic evidence derived from full and partial economic evaluations are increasingly seen as useful and necessary .of these cost effectiveness analysis (CEA) and cost of illness (CPI) studies dominate current practice .   CEA seeks to maximize some total good through the most efficient use of limited resources .   CEA studies are considered full economic evaluations ,they meAsure both the cost of a specific treatment and the expected benefits arising from it   Benefits are often  Waisted in terms of QAlys(quality adjusted life years)   CEA studies provide a close up perspective on the cost s and consequences of specific treatments or health intervention s   They are used widely in a number of areas to compare the effectiveness of alternative forms if treatment for specific medical conditions.   In contrast to CEA ,COI studies are partial economic evaluation and. Provide a broad macro perspective on only the current rather than potential costs associatedv  with different categories or causes of I'll health.   They provide a comprehensive summary of the wide costs involved in any health issue.  Can praise political justification do conducting other types of studies .  Despite their growing popularity ,economic evaluations still require improvement   According to hankivsky et al (2004 ) what is included in terms of costs and how costs are measured and analyzed in terms of their distributional implications reflect an inherently discriminatory methodology that has profound implications for equity   Recently important work is emerging at the interface of economics ,ethics moral philosophy and feminist theory   In particular the value choices and ethical assumptions underlying the production of evidence and more specifically economic evaluations are being interrogated leading to serious questions about existing methodologies and their practical applications  Applying a gender and diversity lens to economic costing studies   In terms of costing studies ,applying a gender and diversity lens can assist in interrogating what is measured ,how it is measured and analysed and how the process either reduces or contributes to health inequities including those associated with gender and it's intersectionalities   Applying a gender and diversity lens also demonstrates that if health care is to become truly evidence based changes are needed in terms of what is counted as evidence .the methods for gathering and synthesizing  Evidence will need to be broadened substantially.   In the context of COI studies used faulty and discriminatory approaches .what is counted and how it is counted dies not yet reflect the municipality of women identities ,interests ,and experiences   The narrow emphasis of costing research on treatment rather than prevention of illness and disease   The breadth and scope of the current generation of economic costing studies severely limit their usefulness to policy makers who are interested in understanding n
More Less

Related notes for HLTC02H3

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.