Chapter 2.docx

5 Pages
147 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Linguistics
Course
LINC12H3
Professor
Karen Lyda Mc Crindle
Semester
Winter

Description
Chapter 2 Meaning and the dictionary  concept of words meaning linked to concept of definition - Aristotle  linguistic ideology - complex of pretheoretical ideas about the nature and role of language  Semantics and lexicography  lexicography - dictionary writing, practical work to put together a book people can understand, not theoretical  linguistic semantic - is theoretical, language is diff from a dictionary because it is a sum of impressions deposited in the brain of each member, dictionary has identical copies  mental lexicon - stock of words and associated meaning in the brain  semantics goal then is to specify the stored meaning representation associated with each lexeme in the mental lexicon History of the dictionary o monolingual dictionaries didn’t exist until 16 century in the West o glossaries or word lists used before o modern monolingual dictionary for people who wanted guidance in language they already spoke o definitions found in dictionaries are result of word based or semasiological approach to meaning  starts with languages lexemes and specifies meaning of each one, specifies differences between words  onomasiological approach – opposite of semasiological, starts with meaning and lists all possible forms available in the language for expression, emphasizes similarities  difference between the two approaches corresponds to difference between a dictionary and thesaurus, semasiological = dictionary Units of Meaning  Defining what a word is is hard to do by looking at writing is because of two reasons o Speakers of the same language from different regions of a country could classify what a word is differently (writing the sentence differently) o Orthographic practices are unstable  ‘potential pause’ – words are units before and/or after which pauses can be found in spoken language (cant be used for morphologically complex languages like English)  word as minimum free form (bloomfield) – minimal unit which may appear on its own without any additional grammatical material ---INSUFFICIENT for words like the, of, is  2 levels words can be defined  phonological (calculating stress syllables), grammatical (cohesiveness, fixed order and conventionalized coherence and meaning) Mismatches between grammatical and phonological words  Morpheme – minimal meaning bearing unit, below lexeme  Above the word level, there are phrasal verbs (touch down, get on with, play around) and noun compounds (tree house, space age, tennis match) where a single meaning comes from both words Sound Symbolism (ideophony/onomatopoeia)  Semi-systematic correspondences between certain sounds and meanings (clash, clang, clatter)  Possible connection might be the acoustic quality of fricative and irregular sound of referent Meanings above word level – Idioms  non compositional phrases (throw in the towel, break a leg) – whose overall meaning isn’t the same as the combined meaning of its individual parts  we can solve the problem of non compositionality by interpreting it partly compositional  idiom can also be non compositional morphemes (sublexical) – ‘able’  considerable, fashionable o noun incorporation – independent noun stems compounded with a verb stem to produce a larger, derived verbs Contextual modulation of meaning  Collocation – immediate linguistic context in which words/morphemes occur  Variation occurs in all of language  I cut my foot…vs I cut the grass/I cut the diamond….nature of the event varies, by means by which it is accomplished, its extent of deliberateness o Contextual modulation of meaning – degree of semantic difference gets even greater if we consider more extended meanings (cut corners, cut a deal)  Compositionality o General Meaning hypothesis – cut may have same vague meaning in all its different collocations (cut my foot, cut a diamond), it refers to the same act (material breach)  PROBLEM =definition is not adequate for all situations, too general and fail to distinguish differences between verbs in same semantic field o Multiple meaning hypothesis – cut may have a separate meaning in each collocation – cut ones foot = accidental, cut a diamond= deliberate  PROBLEM= sheer number of different senses attributing to a verb, how do we ascribe the correct specific meaning in each given case with all the different senses the verb has?...  Non-compositionality o Collocation seen as a whole o don’t need to have general definition of a verb that works in every context o no problem of word sense disambiguation o collocation also determines what reading is operative for verbs object (in cutting the grass we know we are referring to cutting long blades of grass) o PROBLEM – same as compositional, ignores intuition of compositionality of the meanings of the collocations  Mental lexicon does not contain a huge number of independently listed entries for one word, but extracts max. number of generalizations about the meaning of a verb across all collocational contexts to produce the most economic least redundant entry  Compositional meaning/general meaning hypothesis therefore considered preferable  Cognitive linguistics – rejects above a
More Less

Related notes for LINC12H3

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit