Textbook Notes (378,609)
CA (167,197)
UTSC (19,212)
Psychology (9,983)
PSYC12H3 (303)
Chapter 2

Chapter 2 - Stereotype Threat Book

4 Pages
149 Views

Department
Psychology
Course Code
PSYC12H3
Professor
Michael Inzlicht

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full 4 pages of the document.
PSYC12 Inzlicht & Schmader
1
Chapter 2 The role of situational cues in signaling and maintaining stereotype threat
1. Stereotype Threat: A Person In Context
1.1. Rather than theorizing about these causes as rooted in one’s culture or lack of preparation, stereotype threat
theory posited that these differences might be attributed to features of the situation
1.1.1. When situational cues in a setting make a stereotype salient and relevant to one’s actions, the resulting
psychological pressure to disprove the stereotype might depress academic performance
1.2. The Role of Cues and Vigilance in Stereotype Threat
1.2.1. Social identity theory assumes that each person has multiple social identities (e.g., gender, age, race,
socioeconomic status)
1.2.2. When situational cues signal an identity’s value or importance in a setting, that particular group
membership becomes more salient and a vigilance (keeping careful) process is initiated
1.2.3. During the vigilance phase, two appraisals are possible
1.2.3.1. If the cues in the environment disconfirm the possibility that one’s social identity will be a
source of stigma, the vigilance relaxes
1.2.3.2. If the cues confirm the possibility that one’s social identity is likely to be negatively evaluated,
vigilance increases
1.2.4. Murphy’s research on men and women in Math, Science, and Engineering (MSE) found out that women
who watched a video about gender inequality in MSE tended to be more mentally and physiologically
vigilant, and they paid more attention to situational cues, both within the video and their local
environment, to determine the value of their gender identity in the MSE conference setting
1.2.5. The degree to which one identifies with a domain moderates stereotype threat effects
1.3. Situational Cues in Academic Settings
1.3.1. Two cues diagnosticity (helpfulness of evidence and argument) of a test and the relevance of a
stereotype to people’s test performance produced stereotype threat among groups whose intellectual
abilities are negatively stereotyped
1.3.2. Research has shown that linking one’s identity to one’s performance or future potential subtly suggests
diagnosticity and relevance
1.3.3. Stereotypes thereby are made relevant by emphasizing a test’s importance, explicitly linking it to other,
presumably more important abilities, such as one’s general intelligence or future academic potential
1.3.4. Research has also shown that the number f whites or men in a setting can significantly affect the
performance of racial minorities and women
1.3.5. Thus, the physical arrangement and mere presence of certain groups within a setting are subtle, but
powerful, situational cues affecting stigmatized individuals
1.3.6. A study on performance of men and women after watching several commercials revealed how harmful
some commonplace cues can be
1.3.7. People’s behaviour can also trigger stereotype threat. Women use men’s body language as an indicator of
the potential for negative treatment and stereotyping
1.3.7.1. Female engineers that interacted with a macho male student before an engineering exam did
worse, because they cognitively suppressed concerns about gender stereotypes in anticipation of
their test performance. This cognitive suppression ironically led to their subpar performance as it
depleted the cognitive resources required to excel on the test
2. Situational Cues and Social Identity Concerns
2.1. Stigmatized individuals experience more uncertainty in novel situations than do unstigmatized individuals
unsure whether others will judge them according to their identity, or whether their stigma will be a burden that
impinges on their outcomes
2.2. People wonder how their identity will matter for many social and personal outcomes
2.2.1. A female manager that just got promoted may wonder if management promoted her to have more female
presence at the management level
A list of concerns that may arise from situational cue:

Loved by over 2.2 million students

Over 90% improved by at least one letter grade.

Leah — University of Toronto

OneClass has been such a huge help in my studies at UofT especially since I am a transfer student. OneClass is the study buddy I never had before and definitely gives me the extra push to get from a B to an A!

Leah — University of Toronto
Saarim — University of Michigan

Balancing social life With academics can be difficult, that is why I'm so glad that OneClass is out there where I can find the top notes for all of my classes. Now I can be the all-star student I want to be.

Saarim — University of Michigan
Jenna — University of Wisconsin

As a college student living on a college budget, I love how easy it is to earn gift cards just by submitting my notes.

Jenna — University of Wisconsin
Anne — University of California

OneClass has allowed me to catch up with my most difficult course! #lifesaver

Anne — University of California
Description
PSYC12 Inzlicht & Schmader Chapter 2 – The role of situational cues in signaling and maintaining stereotype threat 1. Stereotype Threat: A Person In Context 1.1. Rather than theorizing about these causes as rooted in one’s culture or lack of preparation, stereotype threat theory posited that these differences might be attributed to features of the situation 1.1.1.When situational cues in a setting make a stereotype salient and relevant to one’s actions, the resulting psychological pressure to disprove the stereotype might depress academic performance 1.2. The Role of Cues and Vigilance in Stereotype Threat 1.2.1. Social identity theory – assumes that each person has multiple social identities (e.g., gender, age, race, socioeconomic status) 1.2.2. When situational cues signal an identity’s value or importance in a setting, that particular group membership becomes more salient and a vigilance (keeping careful) process is initiated 1.2.3. During the vigilance phase, two appraisals are possible 1.2.3.1. If the cues in the environment disconfirm the possibility that one’s social identity will be a source of stigma, the vigilance relaxes 1.2.3.2. If the cues confirm the possibility that one’s social identity is likely to be negatively evaluated, vigilance increases 1.2.4. Murphy’s research on men and women in Math, Science, and Engineering (MSE) found out that women who watched a video about gender inequality in MSE tended to be more mentally and physiologically vigilant, and they paid more attention to situational cues, both within the video and their local environment, to determine the value of their gender identity in the MSE conference setting 1.2.5. The degree to which one identifies with a domain moderates stereotype threat effects 1.3. Situational Cues in Academic Settings 1.3.1.Two cues – diagnosticity (helpfulness of evidence and argument) of a test and the relevance of a stereotype to people’s test performance produced stereotype threat among groups whose intellectual abilities are negatively stereotyped 1.3.2.Research has shown that linking one’s identity to one’s performance or future potential subtly suggests diagnosticity and relevance 1.3.3.Stereotypes thereby are made relevant by emphasizing a test’s importance, explicitly linking it to other, presumably more important abilities, such as one’s general intelligence or future academic potential 1.3.4.Research has also shown that the number f whites or men in a setting can significantly affect the performance of racial minorities and women 1.3.5.Thus, the physical arrangement and mere presence of certain groups within a setting are subtle, but powerful, situational cues affecting stigmatized individuals 1.3.6.A study on performance of men and women after watching several commercials revealed how harmful some commonplace cues can be 1.3.7.People’s behaviour can also trigger stereotype threat. Women use men’s body language as an indicator of the potential for negative treatment and stereotyping 1.3.7.1. Female engineers that interacted with a macho male student before an engineering exam did worse, because they cognitively suppressed concerns about gender stereotype
More Less
Unlock Document


Only page 1 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit