Get 1 week of unlimited access
Textbook Notes (241,199)
CA (162,326)
UTSC (20,373)
Psychology (10,620)
PSYC12H3 (351)
Chapter 6-12

Chapters 6-12 Detailed Notes

45 pages138 viewsWinter 2011

Department
Psychology
Course Code
PSYC12H3
Professor
Michael Inzlicht
Chapter
6-12

This preview shows pages 1-3. to view the full 45 pages of the document.
CHAPTER 6: EXPERIENCING PREJUDICE
Prejudice originated and was maintained within the majority perceiver of the
minority target.
It is a fairly intuitive notion to think that if a perceiver holds prejudice toward a
target, and if we want to understand the processes that lead to the formation,
maintenance, and reduction of that prejudice, we need to understand more about
that perceiver.
Stereotyping and prejudice are not processes that involve a perceiver regarding
an inactive target of stereotyping.
Rather, stereotyping and prejudice occur in a dynamic social context
involving the perceiver and target reacting to each other.
It is a two way street, involving feedback from the target and often
confirms the expectations of the perceiver, with the perceivers behaviour
often then confirming the expectations of the target.
SOCIAL STIGMA
Think of being different as a child, how did people perceive you?
Negatively? This is why so many people try to fit in with the majority: so
they will not be singled out for ridicule or treated negatively by others.
Such treatment is fairly overly among children, who, not having learned
socially sophisticated methods of expressing disapproval, will have no
compunction about telling everyone and the individual in question about
the targets deficiencies (sometimes entailing laughter, cruel jokes an/or
physical hostility).
Among adults, those negative evaluations may take the form of subtle
negative comments, rude behaviour, or other subtle expressions of
prejudice.
Noted sociologist Erving Goffman referred to the unusual characteristics
that engender negative evaluations as being indicators of stigma. The
stigmatized person is one who is reduced in our minds from a whole and
usual person to a tainted, discounted one
oStigmas are characteristics that mark the individual as deviant,
flawed, limited, spoiled or generally undesirable
www.notesolution.com
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Only half of the first page are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

oThe reader will note that stigma encompasses all the more familiar
situations where prejudice is shown (i.e. racial, religious, gender,
age, sexual orientation), but it also covers any physical,
Behavioural, psychological marker that elicits negative evaluation
from society.
oGoffman denoted three types of stigmas:
1.Abominations of the body (e.g. physical deformities, being
overweight, etc.)
2.Blemishes of individual character (e.g. drunkenness)
3.Tribal stigmas of race, nation, and religion (e.g. prejudice
against another race).
GROUP IDENTIFICATION
Research indicates that individuals faced with external threats show
stronger in-group identification
oExample: with Jewish persons, African Americans, and women.
Doosje and Ellemers found that people differ in the degree to which they
identify with their stigmatized group.
High identifiers are much more likely to associate themselves with their
group, even when-especially when-it has a negative image.
oHigh identifiers derive much of their self-esteem from their
identification as a group member.
They are much more likely to seek collective strategies
against group threat.
In it for the long run, super loyal.
oLow identifiers, are much more likely to dissociate themselves from
the group, especially when the group has a negative image.
No special affinity toward, or derive no self esteem from,
their group
Quite prepared to let the group fall apart, when the group is
threatened or has a negative image.
Low identifiers are thus much more individualistic and
opportunistic in that they will only identify themselves with
the group when it would positively affect their social identity.
STEREOTYPE THREAT
Individuals in stereotyped groups often find themselves ever vigilant
about not behaving in ways that confirm stereotypes.
www.notesolution.com
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Only half of the first page are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

This is the stereotype threat.
It would seem that if you were aware of the stereotype and you decided to
behave in ways that disconfirm the stereotype, you would behave in that
counter stereotypical fashion, and that would be it.
The anxiety that one feels in thinking about possibly confirming the
stereotype can be so debilitation that it actually impairs ones
performance on the stereotype-relevant dimension, thereby having the
paradoxical effect of confirming the stereotype.
Research suggests that stereotype threat has its effect through the
mediating influence of a drop in working-memory capacity.
Research shows that people under stereotype threat actually fare worse
physiologically than their non-threatened counterparts.
oSpecifically, Black participants in a threatened condition showed
significantly higher blood pressure than their non-threatened
counterparts.
oThe researchers suggest that this may help explain the higher
incidence of coronary heart disease and high blood pressure among
Black persons.
Most of the attention has focused on stereotypes that revolve around
intellectual ability and performance.
Statistics on results of standardized aptitude and intelligence tests over
the decade suggest that African American consistently average about 15
points les son such measures compared to Caucasians.
oWhy:
Socioeconomic disadvantages that African Americans
experience that affect their academic environment,
Cultural biases embedded into standardized intelligence
tests, and
Discrimination and prejudice that they face from others.
oHowever, this does not explain the finding that even when African
Americans and Caucasians have the same preparation.
www.notesolution.com
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version


Loved by over 2.2 million students

Over 90% improved by at least one letter grade.