Textbook Notes (367,752)
Canada (161,368)
Psychology (9,685)
PSYA01H3 (1,206)
Steve Joordens (1,058)
Chapter 6

PSYA01, CHAPTER6

5 Pages
71 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PSYA01H3
Professor
Steve Joordens
Semester
Fall

Description
Perception (FINALE) LANGUAGE AND PERCEPTION p182, GBox, 1 Whorf Hypothesis = pricniple of linguistic relativity - link b/ween language spoken by particular culture AND their thoughts & perceptions (ie. spoken lang. dictates person's thoughts/perceptions) > perception dictated by lang. > lang. has strong impact towards how world is perceived by ppl p182, GBox, 2 Whorf Hypothesis > colour names vary b/c of conventions used from culture to culture Berlin et al's Test of the Whorf Hypothesis > 11 primary colours, diff. term spoken for each lang. = focal colours > if brought down to certain no. of primary colours (ex. 3), all would agree to same ones (ex. 3 primary colours were B/W/R) > shows that fcning of visual sys. plays role in choosing categories for colours & not conventions of culture when it comes to choosing colour names p182, GBox, 3 Heider's Study - ppl (young-adult) remember focal colours more easily than non-focal (ex. remembering blue > turquiose) Roisch's Study: - even if they don't have pre-established terms for that colour, they still learn those that fall under the focal category better than non-focal (ex. Dani culture only had B/W as 2 basic colour terms & when subj's taught made-up names (1 group focal, other group non-focal), remembered focal better) p182, GBox, 4-5 Roberson et al's Study - English-speaking vs Berinmo-speaking adults > place colours into 2 categories: nol (G/B/Pur shades), wor (Y/O/Br/Khaki shades) - each group showed 3 cards - couldn't perform well when asked to make distinctions that the other lang group would see right away (ex. BER. saw khaki & green as diff. colours due to putting them into 2 groups, but ENG. didn't) (ex. ENG saw green, yellow & blue as diff. colours, but BER only saw diff. b/ween yellow & G/B) => colour perception impacted by language p183,GBox, 6 Reiger et al's Study - most lang. groups differentiate amongst certain focal colours - Whorf's hypothesis doesn't apply to universal colours (that all cultures, regardless of their lang., perceive as v.same) Roberson's Study - showed individuals speaking diff. lang's show distinction in ability to tell diff. b/ween colours (colour perception impacted by their lang.) cue = signals? [?] Perception (FINALE) Recall: PERCEPTION - process thro. we recognized the repion of info. coming from sensory organs (whats the meaning behind the info. is identified) VISUAL PERCEPTION OF SPACE AND MOTION - able to perceive whereabouts of obj's w/in environmt & space. p184, 1 Depth Perception- Hows it done? - perceiving distance from obj to us, obj to other obj's > (2) If on sides of heads, then only (1) interposition - if there's an obj that blocks another (comes in front of other), then perceived as being closer to us. (ex. perceive egg being closer than bottle) converge - come Interposition (con) from diff. pts and - most efficient when there's familarity w/ obj. meet up w/ each other - working w/ unfamilar obj's? > depth perception impacted by Principle of Good Form based on objs' loc's from each other> Principle of Good Form - obj. w/ simpler border preceived as being closer. - allows us to see obj. in more than 1 way (allows for ambiguity) (ie.) can preceive (a) as 2 rectangles, where one hiding other, where other option is b) rectangle nested in L-shaped chair rotated 90 degrees) > [A] - 2 identical rectangles, but rectangle that's complete preceived as being closer. > [B] - obj. w/ simpler border perceived as closer (2 same rectangles,1in front of other) > [C] - rectangle pos. w/in L-shaped obj. Seen as being farther away from us (so hidden partly by other) - influenced by Principle to see rectangle as 2 simple shapes, where 1's behind the other 2) Binocular Cues - signals about distance dependent upon input arising from both eyes - arise due to visual field in both eyes overlapping > convergence \ the pt that eyes are fixed upon is the exact same; result from vergence movemts \ input incoming from movemts give info. on how far away obj is from viewer - Why make vergence mvemts? - for looking at v.same pt in scene - key for looking at nearby obj's, ones close to our grasp - angle b/ween 2 eyes related to distance from eye to obj. controlled by muscles (ex. if v.close, angle larger, Fig6.21, Visual Book) - Case: > obj. v.near to face - inward turning of eyes (cross-eyed) = larger angle > obj. far away - pt straight ahead at it = smaller angle > retinal disparity (ex. holding 2 fingers up, putting them at a diff. distance apart, and focusing eyes only on 1) (ex. Result: double img of finger that we're not focusing on; due to img falling at diff. parts of retina, making us see 2 fingers instead of 1) - known fact that obj. at distance distant from focal pt of observer drops at diff. regions on each eye's retina - those obj's at distances different from that of obj of focus fall at diff. parts of retina in each eye > key for telling us how far those obj's are from us Stereopsis - depth perception that's result of retinal disparity Stereoscope - device that disp
More Less

Related notes for PSYA01H3

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit