Textbook Notes (368,316)
Canada (161,798)
Psychology (9,695)
PSYA02H3 (961)
Chapter 2

Chapter 2 The Ways and Means of Psychology.docx

3 Pages
Unlock Document

Steve Jordens

Chapter 2 The Ways and Means of Psychology Case: Justine attempts to increase productivity at her family business. She notices that the chairs cause ache and all so she switches it for an adjustable chair. She encourages the workers and the productivity increases by 20% in one week. After a few weeks passes she stops by again and see that productivity has decreased by 20%. She reintroduces the old chairs and works with the employees to her surprise productivity increase by 20%. Scientific method allows us to determine the causes of phenomena. In psychology the goal is to discover the causes of behaviour. There are three basic forms; naturalistic observation, experiments and correlational studies. They occur in a progressive sequence each one providing compelling evidence. Natural observations – the observation of people and animals in their natural environment (little to no involvement) Correlational studies – can be observed in nature however they undergo formal measurements Experiment – a study in which the researcher is able to manipulate the variable (independent) to see the effects on the outcome (dependent variable). Experiments can confirm cause and effect relations among variables. The five rules of experimentation 1. Identify problem and formulate hypothetical cause and effect relations among variables 2. Design the experiment 3. Perform the experiment 4. Evaluate the hypothesis by examining data obtained 5. Communicate results – scientist report in detail so that the experiment can be replicated and replication ensures that there were no erroneous results in previous experiments Hypothesis (Greek word for suggestion) statement about a cause-and-effect relation between 2 or more events Theories are a set of statements that explains a known fact. Good theories generate testable hypothesis. Variables can assume several values. An experimental group has expectation (the variables can be manipulated by researcher. On the other hand a control group has no expectations (initial value at zero). An independent variable can be manipulated and the dependent variable is measured. Nominal fallacy should be avoided; explained by simply naming it (event). Naming it causes us to cover events that cause behaviour. For example if a man shouts, saying that he’s angry doesn’t explain why he’s acting that way. Operational definition – definition of a variable in terms of the operations the researcher performs to measure. Experiments require specific variables, we define our concepts operationally, in terms of variables that can be measured or manipulated. Validity – the validity of an experiment refers to how well the operational definitions (some variable) capture the concept of interest. Converging evidence strengthens the validity of an experiment. It is when someone has done the same study before using different operational definition of the same concept and concludes the same thing. Confounding variables – confound means fail to distinguish. Inadvertent simultaneous manipulation of more than one variable. The results of an experiment involving confounded variables permit no valid conclusion about cause and effect. For example: there was a debate that argued whether children learn to read better by breaking down words (sup/er/man) or learning them as a whole (superman). They found that the phonics way of learning to read worked much better. However right before the research was conducted children would watch the show “sesame street” which used the phonic way of teaching. This factor influenced the results therefore the results are inconclusive. Counterbalancing – helps avoid confounds. A systematic variation of conditions in an experiment such as the order of presentation of stimuli, so that different participants encounter them in different orders; prevent confounding of independent variables with time-dependent processes such as fatigue. (When testing which read method works better there should be two school which learn them in different orders one learns breaking it down first while the other learns the whole word then you switch this minimizes confounding variables to ensure that the students are not reading better simply because they’ve already learned to read in another way before. To explain better if one had already learned to read one way it should already be easier since they’ve grasped the basic concept of reading.) Reliability – the repeatability of a measurement; the likelihood that if the measurement ware made again it would
More Less

Related notes for PSYA02H3

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.