Textbook Notes (363,559)
Canada (158,426)
Psychology (9,578)
PSYC12H3 (294)

Article - Glick and Fiske

6 Pages
Unlock Document

University of Toronto Scarborough
Michael Inzlicht

C12: Prejudice An Ambivalent Alliance: Hostile and Benevolent Sexism as Complementary Justifications for Gender Inequality- Glick and Fiske Benevolent sexism- a subjectively favorable, chivalrous ideology that offers protection and affection to women who embrace conventional roles Hostile sexism- antipathy (hostility) toward women who are viewed as usurping (taking over) men’s power or trying to control them through sexuality or feminist ideology. ^ both coexist with one another; they are complementary, cross culturally prevalent ideologies, both of which predict gender inequality. Women as compared with men consistently reject hostile sexism but often endorse benevolent sexism. Introduction Pomeroy suggested that classical representations of women fit into the polarized categories of goddesses, whores, wives, and slaves. Feminists who analyze contemporary society argue that similarly extreme characterizations of women are alive and well in popular culture, such as film depictions that divide women into faithful wives and murderous seductresses. The term pedestal- gutter syndrome (Madonna- whore dichotomy) has long been recognized by psychologists, historians, and feminists, most empirical researchers have identified sexism only with hostility toward women, ignoring the corresponding tendency to place women on a pedestal. This article reviews hostile and benevolent sexism Benevolent sexism serves as a crucial complement to hostile sexism that helps to soothe women’s resistance to societal gender inequality Hostile and benevolent sexism are prevalent across cultures, and cross cultural differences in ambivalent sexism are predictable and systematic, with both ideologies relating to national measures of gender inequality. What ASI – Ambivalent Sexism Inventory – research reveals about the nature of sexism challenges current definitions of prejudice as an unalloyed antipathy + draws attention to the manner in which subjectivity benevolent, paternalistic prejudices may reinforce inequality bw groups. The Nature of Sexism Allport in his book “The Nature of Prejudice” defines prejudice as: an antipathy based upon a faulty and inflexible generalization. Some questioned the later half of the definition; mostly all psychological theorists have likewise equated prejudice with antipathy. From antipathy flow the discriminatory acts that disadvantage targets of prejudice Bc ppl seek to justify social systems by believing that groups deserve their place in social hierarchy, a groups disadvantaged status reinforces prejudice. Women are a disadvantaged group. Hunter-gatherer societies, in which wealth could not be accumulated, may have been relatively egalitarian, but the idea that matriarchy was once common has been thorough debunked. Men typically rule, dominating the highest status roles in govn’t and business across the globe. 1 www.notesolution.com Attitudes towards women must be overwhelmingly hostile and contemptuous (disapproving) h/w recent research shows overall attitudes towards women are quite favorable! Women and men both have favorable attitudes towards women then towards men, attributing extremely positive set of traits to women “women are wonderful” effect How can a group be almost universally disadvantaged yet loved? Favorable communal traits ascribed to women (nurturing, warm) suit them for domestic roles, whereas men are presumed to possess the traits associated w/ competence at high status roles their traits reinforce their lower status Allport suggests that the crux of prejudice may not be antipathy, but social inequality. Why Benevolent Prejudices Matter Benevolent sexism is a subtle form of prejudice. Both hostile and benevolent sexism are presumed to be ‘legitimizing ideologies’, beliefs that help to justify and maintain inequality bw groups. Ideologies of benevolent paternalism allow members of dominant groups to characterize their privileges as well deserved, even as a heavy responsibility that they must bear. Benevolent sexism may serve functions similar to belief in the White mans burden (poem from article), allowing men to maintain a positive self image as protectors and providers who are willing to sacrifice their own needs to care for the women in their lives. What if this is a crucial complement to hostile sexism, helping to justify men’s greater privilege and power? If men’s power is popularly viewed as a burden courageously assumed, as legitimated by their greater responsibility and self sacrifice, then their privileged role seems justified. Women who seek power may be perceived as ungrateful deserving of harsh treatment. Benevolent sexism is disarming; it is subjectively favorable in its characterization of women, but it promises that men’s power will be used to women’s advtage, if only they can secure a high-status male protector (Rudman and Heppen) found that college women who implicitly associated male romantic partners with chivalrous images had less ambitious career goals, presumably bc they were counting on a future husband for economic support (Mota, Exposito, Casado) found in a community sample of Spanish women that those who did not have paid employment scored higher in benevolent sexism Women who scored higher in benevolent sexism were more likely to excuse not only benevolently justified discrimination by nonintimate men (e.g. boss) but also overtly hostile discrimination by a husband. o These women are more likely to tolerate rather than challenge, sexist behaviour when the sexist’s motivation can be interpreted as being protective Hostile and Benevolent Sexism: Universal Prejudices? Hypothesis: hostile and benevolent sexism are predictable products of structural relations bw men and women that are common to human societies: (a) men are typically according more status and power than women, (b) men and women are often differentiated in terms of social roles and trait ascriptions and (c) male-female relations are conditioned by sexual reproduction, a biological constant that creates dependencies and intimacy bw the sexes 2 www.notesolution.com ^these 3 factors – patriarchy, gender differentiation, and sexual reproduction – create hostile and benevolent attitudes toward the other sex. Patriarchy + gender differentiation create and reinforce hostile sexism bc dominate groups seek to justify their privileges through ideologies of their superiority and through exaggeration of perceived differences Sexual reproduction promotes hostile sexism bc men often resent women’s perceived ability to use sexual attractiveness to gain power over them Men’s dependence on women (sexual repro + role difference) fosters benevolent sexism, an ideology that counterbalances sexist hostility with a paternalistic protectiveness toward women as a weaker but essential/valuable group (for nurturing children, domestic labor etc) Does sexism encompass separable but related hostile and benevolent components that appear as reasoned belief systems in a variety of cultures? Factor analysis of the ASI suggests yes. Hostile and benevolent sexism consistently emerge as separate but positively correlated factors Three benevolent sexism sub factors appear: 1- protective paternalism (i.e. women should be rescued first in emergencies) 2- complementary gender differentiation (i.e. women are purer than men) 3- heterosexual intimacy (i.e. every man ought to have a women whom he adores). Hostile sexism items also address: - power relations (i.e. women seek to gain power by getting control over men) - gender differentiation (i.e. women are easily offended) - sexuality (i.e. many women get a kick out of teasing men by seeming sexually available and then refusing male advances) Results: Nations in which the ASI were not random and mostly undergrad students were participants; the countries sampled were culturally, geographically and economically diverse = thus, provides support the pervasiveness of hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. o Both factor analyses and correlations of raw scores on the ASI confirmed that hostile and benevolent sexism were moderately positively correlated o Correlations were generally smaller among respondents in the most sexist nations o Sexist respondents hostile and benevolent sexism are only modestly related or independent o Nations in which hostile sexism was strongly end
More Less

Related notes for PSYC12H3

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.