Textbook Notes (368,432)
Canada (161,877)
Psychology (9,695)
PSYC12H3 (298)
Chapter 2

Ch.2 prejudice.docx

9 Pages
132 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PSYC12H3
Professor
Michael Inzlicht
Semester
Winter

Description
CH. 2: Origin and Maintenance of Stereotypes and Prejudice - Kurt Lewin, father of modern social psychology suggested tht social science, and psych in particular ought to have strong applied focus with the aim of addressing social problems and informing social policy and legislation with the goal of improving the welfare of humanity The Formation of Stereotypes Categorization - Stereotype was once regarding as a sign of the moral deficiency of the stereotyper, or as an indicator of repressed unconscious hostility. - Cognitive psychologists found tht the human brain seems to almost automatically classify or categorize similar objects in the environment. This is shown in children as young as 6 months. - Most ppl now agree with Alport that stereotypes as a natural consequence of cognition Why We Categorize - When we see a person we automatically assess that person on the basis of our perception of that person’s features. - We categorize as we have a limited capacity cognitive system that cannot simultaneously process all the available information in our social environment. Because we have a need to understand and anticipate behavior of others, humans have developed ways around our limited cognitive system, one of them is categorization - We categorize ppl (objects, ideas, etc.) on the basis of shared features or even shared time and space - Based on Aristotle’s principle of association, we assume tht things are similar on the basis of one feature or because they occur together will likely have other notable similarities on a number of dimensions Types of Categorization - When we perceive an individual, we classify tht person in a few broad categories like race, gender, and age - These are the most obvious and immediate features of an individual and because 3 categories yield much info abt useful distinctions in social behaviour btwn those in diff grps. These categories are referred to as basic categories or primitive categories that have strong influences as it if most or all of the other info abt the perceived individual. - Mere exposure to a face or a gender grp can immediately evoke the associated cognitions, beliefs, and feelings one has for tht grp. - Stereotypes aren’t automatically activated for all stimuli. Specifically some rsrch as indicated tht upon perceiving category words, we automatically think of associatied stereotypes for that category, yet when seeing a member of one of these grps, we do not automatically think of all of the stereotypes for the grps (race, gender, age ,etc) which the person belongs - Macrae and colleagues suggest tht the way the person categorizes a picture of individual depends on the perceiver’s motives, cognitions, and affect. Only when the perceiver wants to quickly evaluate the target in the picture do stereotypes become activated as a useful means of arriving at an attitude toward the target. In-groups and Out-groups - In groups are groups to which we belong and out-groups are groups to which we do not belong. Ingroups can be quite numerous. How you partition ppl in these grps depends on your current, salient, motives, fears, goals, and expectations. - Taylor and colleagues demonstrated the effect of one’s salient grps on perception and memory for social information. These rsrchers found tht when participants were exposed to a discussion grp of African Amercians and Caucasians, participants were generally accurate at recalling the race of the person who made a particular comment but were less accurate at specifying the particular individual who made the statement. It appears tht ppl tended to perceive and rmr the info in terms of race categories, and not in terms of the individual identity - Outgrps are perceived as those who share similar characteristics, motives and other features. But when it’s your in-group you think everyone is unique who have one or two common features like an occupation. Those out-group members who most closely resemble what one believes is the typical or representative member of an out-group will be mre likely to be perceived stereotypically than those who have fewer of the stereotyped characteristics of the typical outgrp member. - It can also affect criminal sentencing. Individuals with more African features (those typical of blacks) received significantly harsher sentences. Tendency to think in these terms has been referred to as outgrp homogeneity and ingrp bias (favouritism) - Perceiving outgrps as all alike and ingrps as diverse helps us satisfy 2 major goals: we greatly simplify our social environment by categorizing others in tht way and we enhance our self-concept by thinking tht we don’t belong to a homogeneous type of grp where all members are similar in many dimensions instead we think we’re unique and attribute positive attributes to ingrp members - Thinking favourably abt one grps meant tht one was motivated to distinguish one’s grp favourably relative to other grps and this provided the basis for not merely outgrp homogeneity but outgrp derogation. So, in favouring our ingrps, we also tend to put down or attribute negative characteristics to, outgroups. - A study examined facilitative/inhibitory aspects for trait descriptors of one’s ingrp vs outgrps. Paticipants’ reaction time to positive person descpritors were faster when preceded by a priming word tht denoted one’s ingrp (words like us, we, our). Their reaction time were slower to negative person descriptors when preceded by those ingrp primes. When participants were presented with outgrp priming words (they, them), their reaction times to neg person descriptors was not facilitated, so thinking abt outgrps doesn’t necessarily lead one to be prone to readily process and accept negative info abt tht outgrp. - More homogenous the grp is seemed, greater the likelihood for perceivers to use grp or stereotype labels to process info abt the outgrp and its members. This thinking can in fact lead outgrp derogation and outgrp discrimination - Expore to outgrp members can lead to more stereotypes (homogenous) or heterogenous (more positive) depending on the context. if they do something negative then stereotypes will be more reinforced and reduces likelihood tht the perceiver will wish to interact further with the grp and evaluation of the grp becomes more negative - Rsrch ash revealed more fundamentl element of ingrp vs. outgrp categorization: dimension on which ppl are viewed as ingrp or outgrp members does not need to be a meaningful one (racial, political) in order for ingrp and outgrp biases to occur. - Grps tht have no meaningful basis for their membership, known as minimal groups would exhibit the sme ingrp favoritism found in more meaningful ingrps (grps based on race or gender). Minimal grps are called tht because they have none of the usual features of grp structure: a coherent grp structure, face to face interaction, a set of norms for the grp members, interactions with the other grps etc. Social Learning - By age 5, children show distinct recognition of and preferences for, some grps over others including race and gender preferences. Allport suggested that there is a definite link btwn the prejudiced attitudes of parents and the dvlpmnt of such attitudes in their children. He supported the idea tht children of parents who were authoritarian (parents who expected child to obey, never disagree, and to keep quiet and who were more strict disciplinarians) were more likely to dvlp prejudiced attitudes. - Allport also argued tht it is important to distinguish btwn the teaching and the dvlpmnt of stereotyped attitudes and prejudice. Some parents explicitly and directly teach their children abt their attitudes and values, and specifically communicate their stereotypes and prejudice to the child. Allport suggests tht prejudice wasn’t taught by the parent but was caught by the child from an infected atmosphere. Childhood Intergroup Contact - Wood and Sonleitner suggest tht childhood interracial contact is a good predictor of adult endorsement of outgrp stereotypes and prejudiced attitudes. Value Transmissions in Families - Racial attitudes are not inborn and neither is it the case tht race doesn’t influence a child’s perception of the world until years later - Indeed rsrch has shown tht most 3 and 4 yr olds show an awareness of racial cues and show a preference for one race over others. As they get older, their attitudes abt racial grps become more coherent, complex, and intense. - At the early age of life (approx age 10 or so), children are essentially parroting the outgrp sentiments of their parents. - Rohan and Zanna found tht there is support for the notion tht parents and their adult children are very similar in intergrp attitudes. The biggest factor tht seemed to influence the degree of parent and child itnergrp attitude similarity was whether the parents exhibited right wing authoritarianism - Low RWA- children similar to parents but high RWA parents their children was more complex, and depened on whether the child saw the parent as responsive. High RWA respnive parents were much mre attitudinally similar to their parents compared to those who viewed their parents as unresponsive. So, children will adopt attitudes and values similar to those of their parents except when the parents are demanding (high RWAs) and unresponsive. Influence of Stereotypes on Cognition in Children - Majority grp children held more positive attitudes toward their own grp and more neg attitudes toward outgrps. Interestingly, minority grp members also held more positive views of the majority grp than of their own ingrp. - When asked to explain successful performances of majority grp members, both majority grp children and minority grp children made positive, internal, and optimistic attributions. Hwever attributed successful performances of minority grp members to luck. - Majority and minority grp members tend to rmr more positive and few neg behaviours abt majority grp and more neg and few pos behaviours abt the minority grp - Stereotype threat on stereotype relevant tasks; their anxiety abt confirming poor stereotypic performance on the task impedes their performance Implicit Theories - We all have our own ideas of wht personality characteristics seem to go together in pl, and we also have our own ideas abt the nature of personality. These beliefs are implicit theories because these beliefs and heuristics guide one’s processing of social info and help us to evaluate (and sometimes stereotype) others. - Entity theorists- believe tht one’s personality traits are fixed and cannot be changed, while others, termed incremental theorists believe tht one’s personality traits are flexible an can be modified. - Entity theorists tend to believe tht because traits are fixed, they’re stable indicators of behaviour and believe tht behaviour is consistent. As a result, they should also be more likely to infer a host of related target personality characteristics based on an isolated behaviour by the target. Incremental theorists should be less likely to make such an inference because they’re more cognizant of the belief tht behaviour (and personality) is less predictable just based on one sample of behaviour. - One’s implicit theories abt the content and nature of personality can have a profound effect on one’s subsequent beliefs about other groups. The Efficiency of Stereotypes - We tend to reserve our considered cognitive efforts for those instances in which we are motivated to be accurate in our assessment of a slect other person (a team mate, prospective employee or mate etc) and the rest we use stereotypes that we think has some a
More Less

Related notes for PSYC12H3

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit