Textbook Notes (367,876)
Canada (161,461)
Psychology (9,695)
PSYC14H3 (215)
Sisi Tran (101)
Chapter 11

PSYC14 Notes Chap 11.docx

8 Pages
139 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PSYC14H3
Professor
Sisi Tran
Semester
Fall

Description
PSYC14 Notes – Chap 11: Interpersonal Attraction, Group Relations, and Groups Interpersonal Attraction  Despite the great array of different strategies humans adopt in different cultures to make themselves more physically appealing, there are numerous commonalities across cultures in what is perceived as attractive.  First, skin that looks free of blemishes, blotches, sores, and rashes is viewed as more attractive than skin that is not. The evolutionary perspective states that people are especially attracted to healthy mates who would likely produce healthy offspring. Blemishes and sores on the skin could be useful indicators regarding the presence of parasites or diseases. o Our ancestors who preferred blemish-free skin would have been more likely to have healthy mates and surviving offspring; over time, preferences for perfect skin would be more common in the human gene pool.  A second universally attractive feature is bilateral symmetry. Evolutionarily speaking, bilateral symmetry is an indicator of developmental stability. Genetic mutations, pollutants, etc. can lead organisms to develop in slightly asymmetrical ways.  A third feature of attractive faces is that they tend to be average- facial features that are close to the average in size and configuration are perceived as most attractive. 2 mechanisms seem to be at work here: o People with average features are less likely to have genetic abnormalities than people with deviant features (reflecting genetic health) o People prefer average features because they enable quick processing, and quick processing is associated with good feelings.  The attractiveness of average features does not extend to our perceptions of bodies however. The kinds of bodies that are the most attractive are those that depart considerably from the average; we do not like average height, average size muscles, etc.  One aspect of the perceived attractiveness of people’s bodies that varies considerably across cultures is weight.  In looking at the standards of beauty around the world in 1951. Ford and Beach found that it was a human universal that heavier women are most attractive. However, this is not completely correct, especially in the American culture of today. The standards of what constitutes an especially beautiful female body have changed dramatically since 1951, and now we value an especially thin body  Aside from physical characteristics, other processes are involved that influence whether we’re attracted to someone.  Propinquity effect: people are more likely to become friends with those they interact frequently with. There are features of this effect that are not as obvious as they seem: o This effect is extremely powerful- as shown in the choosing of best friends being based on last names at the Maryland Police Academy o This effect operates thru the Mere Exposure Effect: the more we are exposed to a stimulus the more we are attracted to it. This applies to a wide variety of stimuli and appears to be due to the pleasant associations we develop thru classical conditioning when we learn a stimulus is non-threatening and also the pleasant affect associated with easy-to-process stimuli.  Another powerful predictor of attraction is the Similarity-Attraction Effect: people tend to be most attracted to those who are most like themselves. People are more likely to view others as attractive (as potential friends or romantic partners) if both are similar in their attitudes, economic background, personality, religion, etc.  Does the similarity-attraction effect operate similarly across different cultures? This was explored by having Japanese and American participants come into the lab and meet a stranger of the same sex and nationality. The participants then went into separate rooms, completed a personality questionnaire and were later shown a fake personality measurement taken from the stranger. This was made to either be very similar or dissimilar to the one the participants filled out. o Fig 11.2 shows that Canadians clearly showed the similarity-attraction effect while Japanese did not (their liking for the stranger was unaffected by apparent similarity).  In trying to understand the finding above, it was thought that self-esteem could be a key influencing variable. (there is something egotistic in feeling that the most interesting and desirable people are just like us). Indeed, the cultural differences in the similarity-attraction effect became much smaller when controlling for the cultural differences in self esteem. Close Relationships  Our relationships with others are concerns that dominate our lives, and it would be impossible to have a good understanding of human nature unless we considered how people relate to others. The social foundation of human nature is universal, however, the ways that people go about relating to others varies in some predictable and important ways.  While there are obvious benefits associated with friendships, there is a commonly held sentiment in Ghana (a collectivistic culture) that friends should be viewed with suspicion.  When defining enemies as people wishing for your downfall or trying to sabotage your progress, in a survey conducted by Adams, only 26% of Americans reported that they had enemies while 71% of Ghanaians. Also, Americans are more likely to view their enemies as coming from outside their ingroup while Ghanaians view their enemies as coming from within the ingroup (friends, neighbours, etc.)  These cultural differences in enemyships reveal how independent or interdependent people perceive relationships in importantly different ways.  Independent people view themselves as being fundamentally disconnected from others (2 people would have the default state of no relationship). Relations only develop when the people involved decide that forming a relationship is to their advantage- otherwise, no relationship would develop.  Interdependent people define themselves primarily on the basis of close relationships. Relationships are not chosen among people, they are perceived to exist by default. One is born into a family with a network relations, goes to a school, and starts an occupation; the people with whom one shares a context are the people with whom one has a relationship (the default state between 2 people is that they have a relationship). o Similar to the Western idea of unpleasant inlaws, sometimes you will have unavoidable relationships with people you don’t get along with- and these might develop into enemyships.  Even looking at the research by Western social psychologists in the field of relationships, it seems that the theoretical model guiding this research is that relationships are conditional and voluntary, and will return to their null state if people decide they are unproductive.  An important point is that interdependent people do not necessarily value or desire close relationships more than those who are independent. Rather, they view close relationships in natural, noncontingent terms- unlike the emphasis on voluntary relationships more characteristic of people who are independent.  We can look at the differences in view of relationships by looking at what people think about friends. Adams and Plaut found that Americans report having more friends that Ghanaians. Ghanaians view someone who has a great amount of friends as foolish, probably because Ghanaians emphasize that friends were people who would provide practical support (unlike Americans who did not list this as part of their spontaneous definition of friendship). o Friendships among Ghanaians are perceived to involve more obligations than they do for Americans. Maintaining friendships in Ghana is less focused on sharing good times and more focused on meeting the obligations of the friendship.  Thus, these obligations may be quite costly when they need to be fulfilled, and a person with many friends would have many obligations.  Considering love from an evolutionary perspective we can see good reason for its origins. First considering why people feel a sense of parental love, these strong feelings are able to help people in commiting the sizable amounts of time and resources needed to take care of their children. Unlike some other animal species, humans require an extended period of costly protective care and socialization.  The reason for romantic love is similar. It is thought that because children would have been more likely to survive if there were 2 parents around, some strong incentives were needed to keep the parents together so they would support the children. o Those who did not develop feelings of love for their partner would have been less likely to stay with them and would end up having fewer surviving offspring.  If this evolutionary account were correct, people from all cultures should be capable of feeling romantic love- and indeed, this is what is found. There are striking similarities in people’s feelings of love toward their partners, but there are also important cultural differences.  The most obvious example of how culture shapes what people think about romantic love is the existence of arranged vs. love marriages. The majority of marriages around the world are arranged by family members- however, the percentage has been recently dropping.  Broude and Green summarized the results of their survey of “mate selection practices” across 186 pre-industrialized societies. Love is viewed as a necessary feature for a marriage to begin in some cultures but not others. Furthermore, attitudes have been changing towards how critical love is, even in the US: whereas 80% of Americans said they would Not marry someone if they did not love them, a few decades ago this percentage was 65% for men and 24% for women.  Whether a culture favours arranged or love marriages seems to be related to the dominant kind of family structure in the culture. Goode proposed that romantic love becomes more important as the strength of extended family ties becomes weaker. the Western ideal of romantic love could be disruptive in cultures with large kin networks because such feelings can interfere with people’s abilities to respect the wishes of their family members.  In the absence of the social pressures for arranged marriages, romantic love is the critical glue when extended kin networks are not around.  Some research has emphasized the critical role that idealization of one’s partner has in the experience of romantic love. In investigating couple’s perceptions of their partner, it was found that those who idealized their partners the most (viewed them in the most unrealistically positive terms compared to how they viewed others/how their partners viewed themselves) also loved their partners the most and were more likely to stay together.  Idealization seems to foster successful relationships because it protects us from entertaining thoughts about their unlovable characteristics (there is less dissonance between “I love my partner” and “my partner has many unlovable qualities”)  Such idealization should be less emphasized in more collectivistic cultures, where people’s behaviours are perceived to be less reflective of their dispositions. Indeed, this was found in a study that asked Euro-Canadians, Asian-Canadians, and Japanese to evaluate the quality of their romantic relationships compared to what they thought most other people’s romantic relationships were like. In Fig 11.3 we see that all participants idealized their own romantic relationships, but the magnitude of idealization (the difference between the evaluation of their relationship and the evaluation of other’s relationships) was greater in the Euro- Canadians and the least in the Japanese (while the Asian Canadians fell in between).  The fact that Westerners cannot imagine themselves marrying whoever their parents selected reveals a number of assumptions that Westerners have about love: o You will only love someone who you have chosen for yourself  However, even though arranged marriages start out with no feelings of love, typically the partners come to develop strong feelings of love toward each other o Love is ultimately and individualistic choice. Individuals choose their partner because only they know their idiosyncrasies well enough to identify a person they will love  Often, people in arranged marriages trust their families to make the right decision for them o Marriage that does not have love at the foundation is bound to be miserable. In the west, so many marriages go thru tough times and end in d
More Less

Related notes for PSYC14H3

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit