Textbook Notes (362,820)
Canada (158,064)
Psychology (9,546)
PSYC14H3 (214)
Chapter 9

ch.9 for PSYC14

8 Pages
Unlock Document

University of Toronto Scarborough
Ingrid L.Stefanovic

Chapter 9: Culture, Language and Communication The Dual Evolution of Language and Human culture evolution of human cultures is associated with evolution of the ability for verbal languages in humans with language we are able to create meanings about the world around us in terms of symbols humans are intentional agents, having the ability to infer intentions in others, and language aids in our ability to communicate intentions and our beliefs about the intentions of others, to each other quickly and efficiently human culture exists precisely because of the ability to have language; language is a universal psychological ability in humans all humans have an innate ability to acquire language; language forms the basis for the creation and maintenance of human culture each culture creates it own unique language; language differences reflect important differences between cultures, they also help to reinforce culture Culture Influences on Verbal Language: Structure of Language language described using 5 critical features which appear to apply to all languages in all cultures: o lexicon: or vocab: words contained in a language o syntax and grammar: system of rules governing word forms and how words should be strung together to form meaningful utterances o phonology: system of rules governing how words should sound in a given language o semantics: what words means o pragmatics: systems of rules governing how language is used and understood in given social contexts o phonemes are the smallest and most basic units of sound in a language; form the base of a language hierarchy in which languages gains in complexity as sounds gain meaning, which in turn produces words, which are strung together in phrases and then sentences o morphemes are the smallest and most basic units of meaning in a language Culture Influences on Language Acquisition all human infants are born with the ability to make the same range of sounds (phonemes) ability to create an almost infinite number of meaningful expressions from a finite set of elemental sounds is one of the characteristics that differentiate humans from nonhuman animals culture influences language acquisition at very early age and helps shape morphemes of a language and the creation of words through the use of language, an individual is transformed into an agent of culture Language Differences Across Cultures: Culture and Lexicons self-other referents: what we call ourselves and others o in English we use I and we; we use these irrespective of whom we are talking to or what we are talking about many languages in the world have much more elaborate systems of reference that depend on the nature of the relationship between people behavior and language differ depending on status, group orientation, or whether the person is a member of your in-group or not counting systems also provide an example of how culture influences the structure of a language o in English objects are simply counted by the number, with no prefix or suffix to denote the type of object being counted o linguistic differences contribute to differences in math achievements in US and other countries like Japan Language Differences Across Cultures: Culture and Pragmatics Kashima and Kashima found that cultures whose languages allowed pronouns to be dropped tended to be less individualistic, which they interpreted as reflecting different cultural conceptualizations of self and others In Gudykunst study, Japanese rated in-group relationships as more intimate than did the Americans, and the Japanese perceived more personalization but less synchrony across relationship terms o Americans have the lowest personalization and synchronization scores, the Koreans the highest and Japanese in the middle, but only for in-group communication www.notesolution.com o Members of collectivistic cultures use principle of equity involving greater social penetration when communicating with in-group members than do members of individualistic cultures Cultural differences have been documented in # of other communication areas: apologies, childrens personal narratives, self-discloser, compliments, and interpersonal criticism Americans have a higher level of self-disclosure than did the Taiwanese Chinese across all topics and target persons Japanese prefer direct, extreme forms of apology, while Americans preferred indirect, less extreme forms; Americans favor explanation as a form of apology whereas the Japanese preferred compensation Many of cultural differences in pragmatics can be summarized in terms of communication style o Some languages are very direct; others very indirect; some very succinct and precise; others very elaborate and extended o Some cultures are very contextual, that is, important meanings are conveyed in the context within which languages occurs, or in the way in which it is delivered, relative to actual content of the speech Some cultures are high-context cultures with high-context languages, while others are low-context Some languages have specific forms of honorific speech, which are specific language forms that denote status differences among interactants, conferring higher status to others while at the same time acknowledging ones lower status when appropriate and vice versa Language and Thought: The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis sapir-worf hypothesis (linguistic relativity) suggests that speakers of different languages think differently and they do so because of the differences in their languages. It is important for understanding cultural differences (and similarities) in thought and behavior as a function of language if the hypothesis is correct, it suggests that people of different culture think differently, just by the very nature, structure and function of their language; people who speak more than one language may actually have different thought patterns when speaking different languages In support of Sapir-Whorf Carrol and Casagrande compared Navajo and English speakers; examined relationship between systems of shape classification in Navajo language and amount of attention children pay to shape when classifying objects o Performance of low income African American English speaking children was similar to European linguistic features play a role in influencing cognitive processes language we speak influence the kinds of thoughts we have. Language act in a mediating role, helping to determine the ways in which children conceive of some aspects of their world kay and kempton compared thought processes of speakers of English with those of speakers of Tarahumara (does not distinguish between blue and green) Challenging Sapir-Worf berlin and Kay: study of the distribution of color terms in 20 languages; found a limited number of basic color terms in any language; also found that color chips chosen was best examples of these basic terms tended to fall in clusters they termed focal points o findings suggest that people in different cultures perceive colors in much the same way, despite radical differences in their language Rosch wanted to test how culturally universal focal points were; also explored relationship between language and memory. If Whorfian position was correct, Danis lack of rich color lexicon would inhibit Dani speakers ability to discriminate and remember colours. Dani speakers did not confuse color categories any more then did speakers of English though; nor did Dani speakers perform differently from English speakers on memory tasks Berlin and Kay also examined 78 languages and found that 11 basic color terms form a universal hierarchy; they also noticed an evolutionary order in which language encode these universal categories Au concluded that the use of hypothetical interpretations was probably not related to the use of subjunctive or to counterfactual reasoning in Chinese Takona says that differences in amount of mathematical training, not linguistic differences, may have produced the differences bloom originally reported www.notesolution.com Pinker concluded that many of the earlier studies claiming linguistic relativity are severely flawed; we can think w/o words and language, suggesting that language does not necessarily determine our thoughts. Thought is made up of visual and non verbal not just words and language Sapir-Whorf: Whats the Bottom Line? Fishman ordered different approaches in increasing level of complexity; two factors determine the level at which a given version of the hypothesis might fall o First factor relates to the particular aspect of language that is of interestex. lexicon or grammar o 2 factor relates to the cognitive behavior of the speakers of a given language ex. cultural themes or non linguistic data such as decision making task of the 4 levels, level 1 is the least complex; level 4 is the most complex; level 3 and 4 are actually closer to Whorfs original ideas in that they concern the grammar or syntax of language as opposed to its lexicon few research studies test the SW hypothesis at Fishermans level 3 or 4 a considerable amount of research compares lexical differences and linguistic behavior (lvl 1) or nonlinguistic behavior (lvl 2) most of the research is at level 2, comparing lexical differences wit
More Less

Related notes for PSYC14H3

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.