Textbook Notes (369,072)
Canada (162,366)
Psychology (9,699)
PSYC18H3 (275)
Chapter 11

Chapter 11: Individual Differences in Emotionality

7 Pages

Course Code
Gerald Cupchik

This preview shows pages 1 and half of page 2. Sign up to view the full 7 pages of the document.
Chapter 11: Individual differences  Early temperament contributes to personality: one’s characteristics are stable over time across situations. These chars are emotion-based. Biases of Emotion in Temperament and Personality central personality traits (neuroticism, extraversion, and agreeableness) involve individual diffs in emotionality  Affective-cognitive structures: individual diffs in emotion whch affect emotional information processing and behaviour.  Eg) temperament in babies & personality in adults are affective biases that shape feelings, perception, and personality across situations across lifespan. How Individual differences in Emotion Shape How we construe the World  Perceptual biases derive from people’s personality traits and affect daily living.  Anxious people are more sensitive to attentive to threat-related stimuli than neutral stim.  Neurotic cascade: neur people have more daily probs, have more severe emotional response and reactions to recurring probs.  Biases in more anger-prone individuals causes them to feel more angry about ambiguous situations, than less anger-prone.  Hostile attribution bias: bias that contribute to aggressive b and problematic interactions Reciprocal Processes in Emotion Expression  David Kenny’s social relations Model: examines extent to which people expressed the same/diff reactions from others.  Actor effect: how much one expressed same emotions w/ fam members  Partner effect: how much one elicited the same emotions w/ fam members.  Rasbash et al (2011): coded videos of family interactions for neg and positive emotions  Actor effect is stronger for positivity = fam members expressed positive emotions of other fam members more than the neg  Partner effect was evident for negativity not positivity = don’t show characteristic emo expressions in terms of what they express to others and elicit from them  50% of varience in neg and positivity depends on the specific relationship of the two fam members interacting Attachment and emotionality attachment framework: 4 styles secure, ambivalent, avoidant, disorganized.  Bowlby saw attachment as an evolutionarily derived aspect of the parent-child relationship that is activated when the child experiences threat.  Emotions = signals.  Child has expectations about whether the caregiver will or won’t respond. This expectation = basis for a child’s confidence in exploring  Using the strange situation (obs infant emo reactions to separation and reunion w/mom), Mary Ainsworth identified three distinct attachment styles: 1. securely attached: separation = distress; reunion = seek comfort. 2. Insecure-ambivalent: separation = distress; reunion = seeks caregiver, but angry/resistant to comfort 3. Insecure-avoidant: unaffected by sep; reunion = don’t interact w/ caregiver 4. Disorganized (maine and Solomon, 1986): reunion = disorganized and disoriented reaction  Attachment security is linked to diff aspects of socioemotional functioning in later childhood (peer bond, emo understanding, social problem solving) Emotions associated with Attachment styles  Secure infants show positive, neg, and neutral emotions equally  Anger peaks at 14m, decreases by 33m  Ambivalent = more negativity  w/ age, respond fearfully to joy and fearful stimuli, increase in neg emo b/w 1-3yrs  Avoidant = less neg. less emotions overall, followed by secure then ambivalent. They show same physiological arousal to SS as secure, but express negative emotions less. So, as a coping mech, showing these emotions infrequently is unsuccessful.  w/ age, few neg emo at 1y, but increased in fear expressions by 3y.  Disorganized = anger increased w/ age.  Securely attached kids cope better w/ stress than other 3 styles.  Unlike secure, Insecure attachment = cortisol (stress hormone) lvls increase during stressful situations while caregiver’s present  Disorganized = cortisol increased to stressor task but not play; organized = no increase.  Attachment styles have long-lasting physiological effects in systems responsible for stress  Cortisol awakening response: cortisol peaks 30-45mins after waking and declines thereafter.  Female kids and adolescents w/ anxious insecure attachment styles show flattened cortisol awakening responses compared to secure attachment styles. Genetic Influences on Attachment  twin studies show shared (both twins share same family environment)& non-shared (diff env exp) env is more influential on attachment style than genes Bowlby’s Internal working models: beliefs of what to expect in an intimate relationship, which form basis of persisting emo bias.  Change-resistant and affect later intimate relationships (template to understanding relationships and how to act in them)  Adult attachment Interview (George, Kaplan, & main, 1985): Examines How one feels about their early attachment relationships w/ Qs about their relationship w/ parents, and what they remember doing during upsetting times.  Secure/autonomous adult attachment style: adults give objective/coherent accounts of childhood exp (+/-), and recall balance  derives from secure;  Preoccupied adult attachment style: incoherent accounts of experiences + overwhelmed w/ traumatic childhood exp  Derives from ambivalent;  Dismissing adult attachment style: distant + abstract account of childhood; can’t recall events, by idealization or over-rationalization + show little emotion.  Derives from avoidant  Test for continuity of attachment styles by measuring childhood attachment style and then adult attachment style later on.  Continuities in attachment styles aren’t found in all studies, which challenges Bowlby’s theory.  Lack of continuity is explained by disruption in one’s relational context (loss of parent, divorce, illness, abuse etc explain attachment style changes  Longitudinal study (observations across lifespan yields causality) vs cross-sectional study (obs sample at 1 time. Yields no causality, only associations.  longitudinal study = make causal inferences if effect of early attachment styles on adult attachment styles by comparing data collected at 2 points in time.  Cross-sectional = eg) association b/w early attachment (measured in adulthood) and another aspect of adult functioning (marital conflict). Can’t conclude that childhood exp influenced adult functioning, instead two constructs measured in adulthood are related  Securely attached infants = self-reliant, independent, self-confident, high self-esteem, social competence, and emo reg in preshool  Attachment representations affect parent’s abilities to exhibit sensitive parenting, which in turn influences whildren’s development of secure attachment  Influence of adult attachment on infant attachment is weak and this transmission is not understood  Continuities of attachment styles occur, but life events affect these models. The Bridge Between attachment and Emotions  Attachment styles indicate how emotional interactions are handled by the child and caregivers.  Secure attachment = mutually responsive orientation: when parent-child relationships include mutual responsiveness, positivity, harmony promote child’s eager, willing stance toward the other  Kids develop subsequent conscious and moral conduct in preschool year  Lowered lvls of externalizing in children Parental Relationships in Children’s Emotional Organization  Parents’ Responsiveness to Children’s Internal States, contingent responding in infancy, and the ways in which parents talk to children about emotions and respond to some of their emotion displays but not others, all shape children’s emotions Parents’ Responsiveness to Children’s Internal States  Parental Responsiveness: ways in which parents are sympathetic and responsive to kids internal states  Parental sensitivity: mother is sensitive to baby’s signals, interprets it accurately, and resp appropriately o Leads to secure attachment, and better life outcomes: enhanced moral dev, better lang and literacy, few b probs, and a more developed theory of mind.  Studies on causal role of maternal sensitivity show similarities observed in sibling attachment styles can be partially explained by similarities in parental sensitivity o Meta-analysis found parenting programs that increase parental sensitivity increased child’s secure attachment.  Contingent responding  Looking at consistent responding b/w child and parent lets us see Co-construction of parent child relationships and role of individuals in relationships  Beebe et al (2010): observed face-face parent-child (4m) interactions to understand 12m attachment styles by observing parent’s b prior to infant’s b and found marked diffs in disorganized babies vs secure. o Disorganized babies = more distress, neg vocal affect, and incongruent facial-vocal expression @ 4m; over time, inconsistent engagement o Mothers = avert gaze, b frightened bb, show more positive facial expressions during baby distress. Over time, unpredictable gaze patterns  Maternal interpretation of child emotion – is central to emo patterns children dev.  Parent’s interpretations is associated w/ parent’s attachment style  Secure parents = positive biased response to infant pics  Insecure = lacks that + reduced responsiveness.  Dismissive parents = neg phys resp to neg infant emotion expressions bc seen as aversive stimuli unseen in secure and preoccupied.  Synchronization: timing one’s own behaviour in relation to baby’s = Moment-by-moment interactions  Synchronized mothers interact when babies interact = reciprocal and mutually rewarding interaction  Non-synchronized mothers interact when babies don’t interact and vice versa  Mind-mindedness and reflective functioning  Mind-mindedness: can recognize and treat an infant as having their own desires, thoughts and intentions  To respond, parents need to see world for baby’s perspective
More Less
Unlock Document

Only pages 1 and half of page 2 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.