Textbook Notes (363,452)
Canada (158,372)
Psychology (9,573)
PSYC18H3 (274)
G Cupchik (49)
Chapter 7

Chapter 7 Notes.doc

4 Pages
Unlock Document

University of Toronto Scarborough
G Cupchik

PSYC18 Chapter 7 – Appraisal, Knowledge and Experience - Split brain operation: separate left side of cortex from the right - Gazzaniga and the patient who was a split-brain patient: could not process the horror film - Primary appraisal: unconscious, automatic, like reflex - Secondary appraisal: potentially conscious, thought-like, gives rise to specific emotions Appraisal and emotion - Historical background and definitions o Concept of evaluation goes back to Aristotle, followed by Epicurus and Chrysippus o Chrysippus: distinguishedbetween what he called first movements of emotions (automatic) and second movements (mental) o Magda arnold and J.A. Gasson: reintroduced emotion as evaluation o Richard Lazarus: researched stress. Stress produces vigilant attention and heitened activity in the sympathetic branch of the autonomic nervous system.  In the short term, it is an adaptive process, helping people respond to threats, dangers and likely punishments with quick, energetic efficiency.  In the long term, chronic stress is dangerous (financial problems, turbulent periods in marriage, etc.)  Many different kinds of stress: humiliation stress, losing a loved one, starting a new career. Each different kind of stress promotes a particular kind of emotion, by means of a specific appraisal process.  Lazarus proposes that appraisals involve judgments of how good or bad an event is, and that appraisals concern the individual’s goals and aspirations.  Appraisals relate the outer world and the inner self o Stein, Trabasso and Liwag propose that appraisals that give rise to emotions also involve beliefs, inferences and plans:  1. An event, usually unexpected, is perceived that changes the status of a valued goal  2. Beliefs are often challenged; this can cause bodily changes and expressions to occur  3. Plans are formed about what to do about the event to reinstate or modify goal and likely results of plans are considered  What happened? What can I do about it and what might happen next? - Automatic appraisals of good and bad o Robert Zajonc: proposed that we process stimuli through several different appraisal systems  One system provides immediate, unconscious evaluation of whether stimulus is good or bad (primary appraisal), probably involves the amygdala  Other systems: secondary, provide more deliberate conscious, complex assessments  To study automatic evaluations, in suboptimal subliminal condition, participants viewed photos of people for four milliseconds (happy or angry? they don’t know). In optimal condition, participants viewed same foaces for one second (aware of which faces they viewed). The subliminal pictures had a priming effect on participants to like the ideographs o Ulf Dimberg and Arne Ohman: those who subliminally saw angry faces became slightly angry as well PSYC18 Chapter 7 – Appraisal, Knowledge and Experience - Is the bad stronger than the good? o Negative evaluatinos appear to be more potent than our positive evaluations o Loss of $10 is more painful than pleasure at gaining $10. Negative trauma can affect someone for a lifetime. Cockroaches making your food inedible. Not the other way around. Appraisal theories and distinct emotions - Modern research on appraisal split into two families: discrete approaches (emphasize that unique appraisals give rise to different emotions) and dimensional approaches (many components of appraisals that relate to different emotions) - Discrete approaches to appraisal. o Lazarus proposed that there are two stages to the appraisal process  1) Individual evaluates whether event is relevant to personal goals or not, if so, emotion is eliecited, if not no emotion ensues. Individual then appraises ongoing events in terms of extent to which event is congruent or incongruent with goals. Congruent = positive response. Incongruent = negative response.  2) Individual considers a causal attribution for the event, how to respond and future consequences of action. Lazarus calls this the core relational theme of the emotion. o Oatley and Johnson-Laird: postulate appraisals with two components  First there is an appraisal of an event in relation to goals that is automatic and unconscious (in terms of basic emotions such as happiness, sadness, anger, fear and disgust). Each basic emotion has the function of setting the brain into a mode adapted t odeal with a recurring situation (Progress with goal, loss, frustration, threat, toxicity)  Not just +ive and –ive. - Dimensional approaches to appraisal o Phoebe Ellsworth: two reasons why we need to think about emotion-related appraisal from another perspective  Similarities between emotions. Ellsworth contends that an appraisal theory needs to account for similarities as well as differences between emotions (gratitude and happiness = pleasant)  Inability to account for transitions between emotions  8 dimensions: attention, certainty, control-co
More Less

Related notes for PSYC18H3

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.