Textbook Notes (368,164)
Canada (161,688)
Psychology (9,695)
PSYC85H3 (138)
G Cupchik (10)
Chapter 3

Chapter 3 Notes from Benjafield

6 Pages
91 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PSYC85H3
Professor
G Cupchik
Semester
Fall

Description
Chapter 3 Touchstones: From Descartes to Darwin -renaisthnce: ‘rebirth’; refers to the renewal of interest in thassical antiquity that originated in Italy in the 14 century and spread throughout Europe in the 15- 16 centuries -renewed interest also brought a questioning attitude toward the received wisdom of the medieval period RENE DESCARTES 1596-1650 -he saw that our beliefs grow in the way that cities grow; they were constructed over a long period of time by many different people; also, that our beliefs are result of a long process of development that lacks any clean plan -his way of discovering the truth begins with clear and distinct ideas that cannot be doubted -rationalism: our ability to use reason is sufficient to provide us with the truth, provided our premises are correct -discovery of a premise is important because rationalism requires it -Descartes “Cogito”: one cannot doubt the fact of their own thought, therefore they must exist -reach this by using Cartesian doubt -innate ideas: people know certain things without having to learn them; for Descartes this is true -he argued that the body is separate from the mind: dualism -suggested the interaction between mind and body happened in the pineal gland (in the brain) -interactionism: his model of the mind-body relation; he thought of the mind as a ‘ghost in a machine’ -Cartesian model’s important features:  mind and body are separate  body is mechanical, mind comes from God  we know our minds directly through introspection; we cannot know others’ minds; all we can observe about others is from their bodies The Body as a Machine -THOMAS HOBBES also agreed with the body being mechanical -Descartes said animals had no souls therefore were not distinguishable from machines -three controversial issues concerning the body:  can a machine be built that stimulates human behaviour that can’t be differentiated from human behaviour?  are there qualitative differences between humans and other organisms?  should we be able to do whatever we want with animals in research? ISAAC NEWTON 1642-1727 -has been called the greatest scientific genius the English- speaking peoples have produced -his fame rests on his work called ‘Principia’, published in 1687 The Laws of Motion -a law is a basic rule or truth -Newton’s laws of motion -first law of motion: body continues in a state of rest, or of uniform motion in a straight line, unless it is compelled to change that state of forces impressed upon it -second law of motion: acceleration, or rate of change in velocity: acceleration is the resultant of all the external forces exerted Can Newton’s Laws be Generalized to Psychology? -can see organisms as physical systems operating according to the same laws that regulate other physical systems -can attempt to take physics and apply it to mental life, to try to explain the mind in the same way you would any other physical system -several consequences of taking physics as a model for psychology: -the subject matter of psychology is seen as essentially the same as physics; in physics, seek to see how objects achieve motion... in psychology, we look for the motion of organisms (BEHAVIOUR), rather than the motion of inanimate objects The Nature of Colour -Newton also did work on colour, which had far-reaching consequences for psychology -one of his best known procedures: passing white light through a prism that subsequently yielded the colours of the rainbow; put colours through the prism, out came white light -he didn’t believe the rays themselves were coloured; he distinguished between the stimulus for colour and the subjective experience of colour -JOHANN WOLFGANG von GOETHE made significant descriptions of colour as a subjective experience (didn’t give Newton any credit though) -he described the phenomena of after- images The British Empiricists: JOHN LOCKE 1632-1704, GEORGE BERKELEY 1685-1753, & DAVID HUME 1711- 1776 -empiricism should be contrasted with the rationalism that Descartes believed in -empiricists trusts only the evidence provided by the senses JOHN LOCKE -wrote ‘An Essay Concerning Human Understanding’ -argued that there are no innate principles of the mind; contradicting Descartes -when he said ‘idea’, he meant : whatsoever is the object of understanding; ex. hardness, sweetness, motion, man, elephant, etc -said we got ideas from 2 sources:  sensory experience; ex. yellow, hot, cold, soft, hard, bitter, sweet etc reflection; the perception of the operations of our own mind within us; ex. doubting, believing, knowing, reasoning, etc -introspection continues to be controversial -for the British empiricists, our understanding is primarily the product of our experience, not our reason -suggested that even basic concepts, such as colour, must be acquired, as well as less common experiences, like tasting an oyster -thought experiment: device used in science that involves considering the results of an imaginary experiment, which would yield important conclusions (if it could be performed) -for example: a blind man who can tell objects by touch; what if his sight was restored, what would happen if he was asked to name objects by vision? Molyneux experiment Simple and Complex Ideas -simple ideas: cannot be reduced to anything more elementary; ie. coldness, hardness -complex ideas: are compounded out of simple ones; get abstract ideas like army, universe, etc -the fact that there are complex ideas points to the importance of association of ideas -he said that custom settles habits of thinking; therefore the beliefs and attitudes we express are the result of the way in which our ideas have become associated Rewards, Punishment, and the Process of Education -said rewards and punishments are the spur and reins whereby all mankind is set on work, and guided -use rewards and punishment to make children act they way others desired Primary and Secondary Qualities -objects have qualities: the power to produce any idea in our mind; ie. when you think of a snowball you think of a cold white ball -primary quality: one that is in the object itself; ex. motion, size, number, colour, taste, etc -secondary qualities: do not correspond to the experience to which they give rise; ex. a feather can tickle you, but the tickle is in you, not the feather -this all corresponds with Newton’s colour theory, with the importance between stimulus for colour and experience of colour GEORGE BERKELEY -he argued that there were no unambiguous visual cues to the spatial location of objects -ie. the information given just by looking at an object is not enough to tell what it is -he resolved this problem by suggesting that the sense of touch provided the observer with an important source of info that supplemented the visual info -size constancy: when we see a car driving away from us, we do not see the car as shrinking, we see it as the same size but getting farther away -therefore the visual image of an object is associated with a previous experience of moving a certain distance in order to touch the object -according to Berkeley’s view, young children would not have size constancy because they lack the requisite experiences -so, the perceived location of objects is determined by what you do in relation to them If a tree falls in the forest, does
More Less

Related notes for PSYC85H3

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit